schismatic tone here is quite disturbing. If you don't like the Church, leave it.

...or is frighteningly accurate

I am a serene, joyfilled Catholic, clutching my Rosary and my Liber and trying to navigate my little boat in very troubled waters.

you are making something very simple and black and white

NEVER been so simple

Popes have been schismatics in the past.

Schism (from the Greek schisma, rent, division) is, in the language of theology and canon law, the rupture of ecclesiastical union and unity, i.e. either the act by which one of the faithful severs as far as in him lies the ties which bind him to the social organization of the Church and make him a member of the mystical body of Christ, or the state of dissociation or separation which is the result of that act. In this etymological and full meaning the term occurs in the books of the New Testament. By this name St. Paul characterizes and condemns the parties formed in the community of Corinth (1 Corinthians 1:12): "I beseech you, brethren", he writes, ". . . that there be no schisms among you; but that you be perfect in the same mind, and in the same judgment" (ibid., i, 10). The union of the faithful, he says elsewhere, should manifest itself in mutual understanding and convergent action similar to the harmonious co-operation of our members which God hath tempered "that there might be no schism in the body" (1 Corinthians 12:25). Thus understood, schism is a genus which embraces two distinct species: heretical or mixed schism and schism pure and simple. The first has its source in heresy or joined with it, the second, which most theologians designate absolutely as schism, is the rupture of the bond of subordination without an accompanying persistent error, directly opposed to a definite dogma. This distinction was drawn by St. Jerome and St. Augustine. "Between heresy and schism", explains St. Jerome, "there is this difference, that heresy perverts dogma, while schism, by rebellion against the bishop, separates from the Church. Nevertheless there is no schism which does not trump up a heresy to justify its departure from the Church (In Ep. ad Tit., iii, 10). And St. Augustine: "By false doctrines concerning God heretics wound faith, by iniquitous dissensions schismatics deviate from fraternal charity, although they believe what we believe" (On Faith and the Creed 9). But as St. Jerome remarks, practically and historically, heresy and schism nearly always go hand in hand; schism leads almost invariably to denial of the papal primacy.

I'm just trying to figure out what I'm going to do if, God forbid, I am required someday to jettison some Catholic dogmas in favor of another.

Here's the takeaway from this anonymous priest: he believes, with Cardinal Mueller, that it would be heretical for the pope to allow Communion for the divorced and remarried, but such an event is indeed possible, and the pope the would not be prevented from doing so because it would not be an exercise of the extraordinary magisterium.

I guess for a national hierarchy to be talking about changing Christ's teaching on divorce is perfectly acceptable . . . but anyone who objects must be immediately warned that the very act of objecting to such a possibility makes them guilty of being schismatic, paranoid, pharisaical, intolerant, uncharitable, unmerciful and reactionary.