One never knows though. I filled in for our Saturday Vigil and had to make a face and cup an ear before "At the Lamb's high Feast" finally got going.
At the Lamb’s High Feast really gets the congregation going.
At my current parish, this was an unfamiliar song to a significant percentage of the congregation. I even got a complaint once for playing too much unfamiliar music at Easter, with this listed as one of the "unfamiliar songs."
Sounds like a suggestion to sing it every Sunday of Easter in order to make it familiar. Maybe that’s why our MD has programmed JCIRT at every Easter Mass this year...or because it’s trending on social media this year.
I've never had the cahones to do the same hymn multiple weeks in a row, although I've done a few hymns every other, or every third week for 2 or 3 cycles.
Send Us Thine Asteroid, O Lord
A prayer I quote often.
I think your decision is prudent. Better to sing 2 or 3 really well, then 4 really poorly. This is why the only gloria we are singing in Latin right now is de Angelis. It's easy, happy sounding, and just as importantly: the only one we are singing, so people can learn it really well.I know it could sound like a step backwards, but I've been convinced that in my circumstances this is just more conducive to congregational singing.
On a more serious note, the cultural decay in our country, and throughout the West generally, is more to blame for the erosion of taste and appreciation for any of what used to be called "high art". Between 1974 and 1997 I taught a general education music "appreciation" course something over 100 times. My classes were large, 35 to 70 students (mostly 40 or so). The students were college students and seldom did I have more than 3 or 4 students who had ever heard a live orchestra, a legitimate singer apart from a parody, or any of the classical orchestral literature except when they were watching cartoons on TV when they were children. Some of them had a whole fascinating world of options open up to them in that class. Most remained where they were. I always told them that I did not want to take anything from them, but I did want them to be aware of a world of great things to listen to if they wanted it. Some did, some didn't. Our parishes are filled with people like them whose schools, churches, homes, and the incredible mass media that we have at our disposal have allowed the bar to drop awfully low. Raising it has become a ponderous task.
Louisville, in general, has better musical institutions than Nashville with the exception of the Blair School of Music, although UofL and Bellarmine combined put up a fight, and down the road in Lexington there are some mean choral forces (in the best way). And it was a bigger place for a long time than Nashville, but what holds Nashville back now is that the symphony was explicitly founded to perform new, at the time, works in various twentieth-century styles that contrast greatly with ("real") classical music. It's miserable. We have some excellent early-music ensembles and performers, and Belmont also produces excellent vocalists, but it's dreary.Their children haven't continued the habit of donating to orchestras to subsidize 20th century atonal music.
this, my dear compadres, is why we will not have a “successful” program of sacred music. As long as we Kowtow to the masses (pun intended) we will always be scraping the bottom of the music barrel… and it’s not pleasant to live down there… especially when we know better.The two main “requests” I get at my parish… That's coming from an “audience”…
In my experience this compartmentalization difference is very real, and difficult for anyone with a classic "high art" sensibility to grasp. As strange as it may sound, at least some of the people at the pop concert also want masses with traditional music.
This is why I don't think your typical suburban parish can just hit the "RETVRN TO TRADITION" button and expect it to make everything better.
Classical music is in deep trouble right now in the USA, and I would guess the rest of the Western world. The overlap between Classical music and traditional Sacred Music means means that much of this trouble is going to arise if you attempt to force exclusively traditional Sacred Music on a congregation that hasn't already self-sorted into the one destination trad parish in your local area.
Please return to your strumming and yodeling and let the rest of us get on with the work at hand. The era of folk music is DEAD and guitars are dying along with the amateurs who play them. The biological solution is at work.
If you want to make convincing arguments to people outside your subculture, be aware that framing all music that isn't chant or hymns like this won't work
No...simply NO.As one who has changed 3 parishes from crap folk music to tradition (Im on no.4 now) three things have occured.
In my experience this compartmentalization difference is very real, and difficult for anyone with a classic "high art" sensibility to grasp. Strange as it may seem, at least some of the people at the pop concert also want masses with traditional music.
I particularly object to the replacement of hymns with English chanted propers. This corpus of music is not mature. The effort to create such music largely started in the pontificate of Pope Benedict XVI. It's had a similar amount of time to grow as the folk music had in circa 1975. A very large amount of the English chanted antiphons that are currently being marketed are drek.
There is little to no support for English chanted antiphons from the people in the pews in every parish I have ever served in.
To participate in the discussions on Catholic church music, sign in or register as a forum member, The forum is a project of the Church Music Association of America.