* When do you just give up?
  • GavinGavin
    Posts: 2,795
    It seems nearly every day (sometimes more often) is a post, usually from a newbie, sometimes not, like:

    I'm so glad to have found this forum, the CMAA, and the Colloquium! I love chant and polyphony, but the pastor, choir, and all the school staff wants bongos during communion and "Awesome God" for the psalm, and chained the organ console shut. How do I switch to the Graduale Romanum and Palestrina ordinaries?

    Usually this is met with a chorus of "brick by brick", "baby steps", or other comments, which I frankly find to be unhelpful platitudes. Or perhaps a "moderate" route is suggested, where the musician is encouraged to use either "less offensive" music or familiar, tired hymns. Note the absence of the propers.

    I think we've all been in the hypothetical poster's situation. So my question is, at what point do you throw your hands up and say, "I'm not going to do any good staying here!" and just find employment elsewhere? I know people with families to support need to do so and some people are less mobile than others. But why not look for work elsewhere? Or at least if you NEED the job, just stop making waves and keep your mouth shut.

    Every time I see one of these posts, I just want to say, "It's hopeless, you're only hurting yourself, go somewhere else." But I don't want to be discouraging, so I just keep my mouth shut. But isn't it sometimes hopeless? Or at least change is more trouble than it's worth?

    Or am I just being pessimistic?

    I'm not talking about "I'm quitting because the priest asked me to do Mass VIII!!" And I know that every job has its trials and downsides. I'm talking about a church with total static inertia, where decent music and musical talent are treated as evils to be feared rather than gifts to be celebrated. That seems to be the place a lot of people are posting from, and I continuously wonder: why do you place yourself in that situation willingly?
  • Scott_WScott_W
    Posts: 468
    I can understand the frustration from "brick by brick" platitudes, but when I hear someone with difficulty in their parish, I am inclined to hedge my bets so to speak because I only have his side of the story and without knowing more, I can't really prudently recommend pulling up stakes or charging like a bull into the rectory with a list of demands. On the other hand, I have no problem telling people I am totally on board with St. Chrysostom and that sentimental music (i.e. virtually everything from the Haugen/Haas/Shutte ouvre) is poisonous to the soul.
  • Kathy
    Posts: 5,524
    I think the wrong question to ask is whether I could be happier in the same position somewhere else. The grass is always greener--and it really isn't. Frustration will be waiting in the next parish. It's that kind of gig, and that kind of historical time in the Church.

    A more productive question is, is this parish music program better off because I'm here? And if it is, stop stressing out (as much as possible) and keep doing your best.

  • TCJ
    Posts: 1,034
    I've done just what you mentioned, Gavin. I had one job with a great pastor... and he got transferred after one year. Next pastor was your typical new-wave music style pastor and I just gave up and looked for work elsewhere. Next job... ended up being the same thing, and I moved elsewhere again. The problem that I find with hopping around is that most churches have pastors that move about frequently (at least around here) and that a good situation changes into a bad one in the blink of an eye. There's no perfect job that can't come crashing down in an instant. So... do you keep resigning one place and look for something better?
    Thanked by 2francis Gavin
  • This doesn't seem to appear (at least but rarely) in the Catholic Church. It would be nice, though, if it did, and that bishops would consider this in making appointments. Namely, that in the Anglican world there are parishes which have traditionally outstanding liturgy and music, perhaps for generations, and these are so much a part of the parish spiritual fabric that no new priest could or would be permitted to change it. It would be a step in the right direction if such simple pastoral respect (and obligation) were to find a home in the Catholic Church. One thinks of such stellar places as Washington's St Paul's, K Street, or St Thomas', New York, but there are countless less famed cathedrals and parishes whose music and liturgy are beyond harmful touch by the callous whims of an unsympathetic new pastor.

    One might well question the truly pastoral concerns of the sort of priests mentioned in this conversation. How often are 'pastoral concerns' invoked in imposing a pastor's predilictions in a most un-pastoral and impolite manner! Certainly, the spiritual lives of 'the people' are not served by them being jerked this way and that every time a new and culturally illiterate priest takes the reigns. And, bishops who are genuine shepherds should, likewise, take these things into serious consideration. They should very well be mindful of the value that VII placed on the Church's musical 'treasure' and expect their priests to do likewise with enthusiasm. (That this enthusiasm is not bred into them at seminary is a gross misfortune for which the Church pays dearly.)

    More to the immediate point of Gavin's topic: I think it does little good to remain in a bad situation for an undue length of time. When one, after rational consideration, realises that the priests and people of these parishes not only couldn't care less but are actually hostile to the VII's 'treasure', one should, for one's own sanity and spiritual well-being and growth, shake the dust off one's feet and search for more fertile ground.
    Thanked by 3CHGiffen JL tomjaw
  • matthewjmatthewj
    Posts: 2,676
    Has anyone ever thought what our world(s) would be like if we were treated like priests?

    Music Directors take an oath of loyalty to the Bishop.
    The Bishop appoints the Director (DM1) to Parish X.
    DM1 has job security (pastor can't touch him).
    DM1 fixes things, gets comfortable in his/her job....
    Then the Bishop (or more likely some committee) sees DM1 has tons of potential and appoints him/her to Parish Y where DM7 has really messed things up. DM7 is appointed to be Music Director of a nursing home and quits, disavowing his/her oath.
    DM1 has a really hard time cleaning up DM7's mess, but finally does.
    Then the committee sees how great DM1 has done fixing Parish Y and decides to send DM1 to Parish W where things are really bad.
    DM1 has a breakdown and goes on sabbatical.
    DM1 returns and is sent to be Associate Organist at Parish G because everyone's pretty concerned about DM1's stability.
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 12,041
    Good point!
  • GavinGavin
    Posts: 2,795
    Kathy has a most substantive answer, reflecting my thought process. There's two very interesting parts to her response:

    "The grass is always greener--and it really isn't."

    I think I made clear that I understand that. I just started a job where I have minimal responsibility, great music to play, a very talented choir to accompany, etc. But I have my complaints (which I won't air here). As I said above, I'm not talking about "the priest wants me to do Missa de Angelis", or "my countertenors have too much vibrato" or other ecclesial equivalents to the "First world problems".

    I'm talking about going into work and being ordered to do something you think is downright wrong (I would place songs in place of the responsorial psalm in this category). Or being hated or abused by the powers that be just because you accompanied one song on the organ. Would that this were all hyperbole!

    Yes, the grass is always greener, but it must REALLY look green when you're standing in a field of mud.


    "A more productive question is, is this parish music program better off because I'm here?"

    That's a great way to look at it. But I think there are still situations where even a talented musician does NOT improve the program. Say you accompanied a lovely rendition of Schubert's Ave Maria at Offertory one Sunday, sandwiched between three folk hymns. Well, the propers were ignored, and the congregation's impression of sacred music remains that it's entertainment. Have you really made the program better off in any substantial sense?

    If you want to take "better off" to just mean increasing the quality of the performance or the repertoire, there's another organization you can join. They do good work in that area, and that's NOT an insubstantial goal. Most everyone here DOES increase substantially the quality of performance and repertoire at their parishes. But if the paradigm of the parish is one antithetical to the liturgical concept of the Roman Rite... well, sorry, but you're NOT doing much good there, on balance. Which is emphatically not to condemn anyone's work, but simply to point out that there are objective standards for how closely a liturgy reflects the "mind of the Church".


    I probably sound pretty depressed in this thread... actually, my work is very intense (I have three 1/4 time jobs and a full time graduate course load), but rewarding and enjoyable. But I do despair of so many threads where it seems fine musicians are simply wasting their time and talent to no tangible end.
    Thanked by 1DominicanCantor
  • Scott_WScott_W
    Posts: 468
    But I do despair of so many threads where it seems fine musicians are simply wasting their time and talent to no tangible end.

    Let me gripe in your thread if you don't mind. I would add that there are many fine musicians in a given congregation who won't join the choir precisely because it mostly programs fluffy junk. So you will get the usual, "Ok, we have to sing 'Here in this Place' for the procession. The usual kid's campfire melodies for the Gloria and the psalm. Then it is "Here I Am" for the communion. But then, but then, after we have paid our dues, we get to do Ave Verum Corpus!" But of course in most cases you have one or two fine musicians and a bunch of croakers, so it doesn't sound very good. Thus, the status quo is maintained.

    Joining the choir isn't just a time commitment. It usually means worship separate from you family. That's a big sacrifice that many fine musicians are willing to make, but not if one is forced to sing 8 pieces of sentimentalist bilge-water just to get to the one piece that is actually worthy of the setting. In other words, most parishes are sitting on a gold mine of talent, but can't bring it bear for a whole host of excuses, but today I'll just label it all democracy.

    I've seen one victory. In a former parish we formed a schola as a side project not under the oversight of the parish. We sang plainchant, we sang the good stuff. We attracted great musicians from the college. Then, when the parish's regular choir wasn't in session, we offered to provide the music for masses. We had some parishioners in tears of joy, the quality improvement was palpable, and instead of mumbling through the usual slag-pile, the congregation sang out with us. Through some serendipitous circumstances, there was some job shifting and retirements and the schola became the official choir. So it is possible.

    P.S. I was just spitballing with Ave Verum Corpus. I'm sure someone could say that there are simpler pieces that are just as good, that it is not really programmable because etc, etc, etc. Please don't cavil.
  • Kathy
    Posts: 5,524
    See, that's the key, in my opinion. Staying in one place, over time, the program becomes less about the drek that is sung on any given Sunday, and more about the development of the remarkable untapped talent among the PIPs.
  • In the most successful of situations there is a true partnership between the pastor and the DM. Both need to be able to talk honestly about problems, goals, etc. My pastor
    teased a colleague once that he (my pastor) and I were not only reading the same book,
    but were frequently on the same paragraph! Even with this level of cooperation, things
    don't happen automatically. It takes high-level communication to accomplish agreed-
    upon goals- not just communication between the Pastor & DM, but more importantly
    between them and the people of the parish. If I can offer any advice that is worthwhile,
    it is to work with the children, getting their parents to solidly support the program.
    Children are born with "good taste" and revel in it until we adults teach them otherwise.
    Get them singing quality music well at a young age and then encourage and nourish
    them and watch them teach the adults! If you get discouraged, find a quiet place, say
    a prayer, put on music of your favorite composer and pour a glass of your favorite port- or your preference- and concentrate on nothing but the music. I wish you all the
    best!
    Thanked by 1Claire H
  • Claire H
    Posts: 366
    SamuelDorlauque is right...I find that in my situation, even thought it seems like there are sometimes a blow of obstacles/opposition from members of the congregation, the fact that I work under a humble, prayerful, supportive pastor is a big plus. We can share the vision and understanding, and I don't feel entirely alone. :)
  • lmassery
    Posts: 433
    If any of you with more experience see a newbie explain a situation that to you seems hopeless for even the most experienced and thick-skinned musician, let them know. Otherwise, they may get discouraged that they can't fight the fight the way so many of you admirable musicians are doing.
  • GavinGavin
    Posts: 2,795
    I second what Claire H says regarding having a good boss... it helps a lot if you're both in the same boat.
  • I have contemplated this question quite often. My easy answer is, when you're fired. More difficult answer, when the pastor is leading the congregation astray and you are required to be an accomplice and you cannot in good conscience remain.

    Kathy
    Thanked by 1noel jones, aago
  • But, isn't the determined and willfull practice of poor music and litrugical usage leading the congregation astray? Seeking better ground in which to sow one's seed is not 'giving up': it is wisdom. Also, if 'conscience' isn't involved in the sort of music one is willing to perform, it should be!
  • But, isn't the determined and willfull practice of poor music and litrugical (sic) usage leading the congregation astray? Seeking better ground in which to sow one's seed is not 'giving up': it is wisdom. Also, if 'conscience' isn't involved in the sort of music one is willing to perform, it should be!

    Three honest questions, not just for MJO-
    *To whom shall we go to ultimately determine what constitutes "poor music and liturgical usage?"
    *Where is "astray" and what does that mean for each soul led there?
    *Whose conscience(s) should be part of the deliberation of self-assessment?
  • 1) To whom should we go? First and last, we all know that Jesus is the one 'to whom should we go'. In concert with him I could suggest that, to start with, comparison to what an earnest person would know very well what was meant by Vatican II's emphatic endorsement and command regarding that 'treasure' of the Church's which was 'greater than any other' would be a very good place to go.
    2) Astray is off the path of musical and liturgical praxis suggested and legislated by the Church, and (as logically follows) departing from that which emphasises the uniquely sacral, holy, nature of the eucharistic act. Again, comparison to what the Church in Council was apparently referring to by the use of the words 'treasure greater than any other' is a good place to start.
    3) One's own conscience should most certainly be a key factor as 'part of the deliberation...'. We are not required to disobey our consciences. Doing so is not even recommended. A requirement that one do so is tantamount to being not just 'led astray', but dragged astray under duress. Such a requirement is, further, an act of deep and calculated disrespect and contempt, not to mention loveless.
    Again: searching for better soil is not 'giving up': it is wise.
    However: if one can see genuine progress and, with a reasonable expectation of a good harvest, feels called to see it through, then one should do just that.
  • GavinGavin
    Posts: 2,795
    *To whom shall we go to ultimately determine what constitutes "poor music and liturgical usage?"
    *Whose conscience(s) should be part of the deliberation of self-assessment?


    These both rest on the individual musician. Outside of certain pastoral circumstances, I consider willfully playing many particular songs (I shall not name them) in a liturgical context to be an immoral act on my part. That, by doing so, I am performing a very small but still evil act. "Sin"? Maybe not, but I still think it is wrong for me to do.

    Other musicians may find that song "good enough", "not worth the fight", or even acceptable. And I encourage them to only be bounded by their own consciences. But to be in a position where I am required to willfully cooperate with the imposition of inferior and inappropriate music upon the liturgy is damaging to the soul. For that matter, I'm always amused by the voices screaming about this or that song being "heretical" - and we all know these same voices will on Sunday be singing those same songs into a microphone while playing!!

    I say, act in accord only with your OWN conscience, properly formed, and not someone else's. But, at the same time, don't IGNORE your own conscience because "well at least I play hymns better than the other guy!"
  • GavinGavin
    Posts: 2,795
    "However: if one can see genuine progress and, with a reasonable expectation of a good harvest, feels called to see it through, then one should do just that."

    I think Jackson has it right here. What I've been getting at is "reasonable expectation of a good harvest." We have many people here in bad situations who can expect such a fruitful harvest. The signs are all around, when chant scholas are formed, when choirs voice-build while gaining better repertoire, when the propers are regularly employed.
    Thanked by 2Kathy CHGiffen
  • Gavin, I was DoM in a situation like you mentioned in your post.

    In response to a small group of (just happened to be) boomers, the pastor told me, "no Latin, no chant". This ruled out even English (or any vernacular) plainsong.

    I sent a detailed, respectful letter with document quotes about why I felt I was called to implement sacred music as DoM in a Catholic parish. No response. After a few weeks I gently reminded him that he offered me a job because he heard my small Latin choir and loved the sound. No change in his ultimatum. I waited...

    ...and went along with it for a very long choral year before coming to the conclusion that God couldn't use me much there and that he wanted me somewhere else. I resigned my post on good terms, and I still maintain contact with that parish, and occasionally sub as cantor.

    Five months after I quit, I was offered a job as DoM of a FSSP parish- for more hours, more responsibility, and quadruple the salary I had earned at the previous (and more wealthy) parish.

    Sometimes I think it really is best to stay and brave the tide of revolving pastors, etc. One can often make gradual and important changes. In my case, I have no doubt that resigning was the best choice.
  • GavinGavin
    Posts: 2,795
    MCW, what a great comment!

    Would I be concluding correctly that your advice in such situations is, "stick with it, and jump on whatever comes along next"?

    I think you've laid out a very common-sense approach here, and told an inspirational take.
  • WendiWendi
    Posts: 638
    When your cardiologist tells you to decrease your stress levels. ;)
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 12,041
    However, I have always been glad that I don't like the taste of alcohol. :-)
  • CharlesCharles
    Posts: 12
    Sorry to renew such a long-forgotten thread, but I feel inclined to say that what Gavin mentioned at the start of this discussion is particularly noteworthy. Perhaps more recent threads have conversed about this (at length), but this one caught my eye.

    It seems like my first post on this forum matched the exact description of Gavin:
    I'm so glad to have found this forum, the CMAA, and the Colloquium! I love chant and polyphony, but the pastor, choir, and all the school staff wants bongos during communion and "Awesome God" for the psalm, and chained the organ console shut. How do I switch to the Graduale Romanum and Palestrina ordinaries?


    Before I go any further, I urge people to realize that we are all human. I notice a common trend of ourselves being acerbic rather than academic at times in this forum, and want to be clear that I strive to serve God as fully as possible. If something I say isn't 100% doctrinally or theologically accurate, mea culpa. I literally started doing all this just 3 years ago. When I shared my story on the Lamentations and Observations of a Gregorian Greenhorn thread, I wasn't expecting any feedback at all, but was graced to receive nearly a dozen comments! However, I let the discussion sink because I accidentally used a motto that I misunderstood-and I guess it didn't mean what I thought it did. So, people informed me of my error in some gentle and some blunt ways.
    Anyways, we all differ in various ways, but we share common goals: serving God in the ministry of music, learning more about our Catholic faith, and singing On Eagle's Wings (okay I jest on that last one).


    These questions may have been asked plenty of times before, but please bear with me:

    Is it hopeless to attempt introducing antiphons/plainsong/Latin at a parish that will likely be closed within a year?
    For context, I serve as a volunteer about twice monthly at a rural parish with mass attendance around 90 people on a great day. They are decently musically inclined, but gravitate towards sacro-pop and any music from after 1965. They seem to do well with my introduction of basic Latin hymnody (Panis Angelicus, Pange Lingua (St. Thomas Tune), Adoro te Devote, etc...), but because of my irregular attendance-is it worth my time to teach more music if I'm not there every week and church closure is nigh? These people are the most welcoming congregation I know, and they have been fighting tooth-and-nail to keep the church open, despite the Pastor's willingness for it to close.

    Is it ever worth it to return to a parish you previously served, but resigned from?
    Once again, for context, I served as a volunteer for several months, then became paid for the next 2.5 years of ministry. I resigned from the Arcade Worship Site in May because I did not agree with the direction the choir was heading, and there was a weird democratic structure insomuch no DOM existed, but decisions were led by the senior citizen members. After I initiated and guided all the music for Lent this year, the organist prevented my leadership for the upcoming Easter season, and there were definitely elements of ageism that induced my resignation. The organist once said she'd retire in five years (this was in 2022), and I want to be the first to lead the choir after she departs - I hope that's not selfish, but that was my home parish for well over a decade, and I feel I can make some tangible positive changes. I'm on great terms with everybody in the St. Mary's choir except the current organist there. Also, we have been fortunate to have a priest from Poland in-residence at Arcade, so I aspire to learn the language and host a Polish Mass with music sometime (our church has a history of Polish priests). I'm on very good terms with the resident priest as well.
    I really don't know if this is just a "look somewhere else" kind of situation or "God is giving you a trial, take it" situation.

    Does anyone on this forum do music ministry full-time without any formal degree?
    I am largely self-taught (not opposed to formal training though), and feel that has been a blessing and curse. Blessing: I get to learn new things experientially, and at my own pace. I can play whatever religious music I want whenever I want. Curse: I feel nobody takes me serious on a professional level because I don't have the paper evidence that I can play an instrument. Down the line, when I hope to apply for DOM positions, the only thing I can advertise is my years of experience hands-on and absolutely no collegiate music training. It seems that some sort of music degree is better than none, but since my intended career is in Nursing, there is no overlap in course load at all. I have formed connections in my Diocese to well-known pipe organists, and am trying to find someone that could teach me not only pipe organ, but other church music stuff.
    They say never to share your dreams, but I feel better sharing this. My ultimate dream is to become the Director of Music &/or Principal Organist for a cathedral somewhere around the USA, and to have a very-motivated SATB choir that does plainsong, Latin, and polyphony. I keep my goals in check because that aforementioned dream is perhaps a lifetime journey. Currently, my plans are to pursue a healthcare profession to pay the eventual bills, but I feel more fulfilled in the ministry of music. Is there any hope to someday be a DOM, and not need to worry about financial stability?
  • GambaGamba
    Posts: 641
    Charles,

    Life is long. If you can afford it, there is plenty of time do two degrees, or a double-major.

    My ultimate dream is to become the Director of Music &/or Principal Organist for a cathedral somewhere around the USA, and to have a very-motivated SATB choir that does plainsong, Latin, and polyphony…. Is there any hope to someday be a DOM, and not need to worry about financial stability?


    Yes, there is hope. I’ve worked happily in a succession of such positions and have never been hungry or homeless – BUT it’s contingent entirely on the fact that I have organ and church music degrees. A responsible committee isn’t screening applicants for degrees to be elitist or to be lazy. One needs the knowledge and experience passed on in degrees to be able to do the job well.

    How would someone be able to lead and improve a great choir unless they’ve studied conducting, choral lit, voice science, vocal pedagogy, and music history? How would someone be able to play several hundred Cathedral liturgies a year if they haven’t studied all manner of rep and don’t have the experience necessary to learn a huge amount of music quickly, and training in improv and serviceplaying?

    I’d like to think I’m pretty useful around the house, and I can fix many minor things with my little collection of hand tools. But I cannot be a plumber, electrician, or mechanic with just the tools I’ve picked up over the years. I would need a lot more tools and a lot more knowledge to rewire a kitchen or replace a drain or swap a transmission. I could attempt to do those jobs with what I’ve got on hand, but I’d end up making a mess, damaging things and disappointing people who trust me.

    The point of university education for church musicians isn’t to learn cool facts and flashy rep – it’s to be equipped as best as possible to work with and for God’s precious children in our choirs and parishes.

    Sure, someone can try and do it another way, but it’s a big risk in the same way that my Red Cross first-aid training and some health books I’ve read would not adequately prepare me to walk into a hospital and put on a nurse’s uniform.
  • TCJ
    Posts: 1,034
    It is possible to be full-time in a music director position without a music (or related degree) as I've done it for a fair number of years. It's going to be harder and you will need to take what you can get. In my case, I was fortunate to find a church that had no choir or organist period when I got the job so the only place to go was up. That said, I'm not necessarily recommending this as the way to go because I'm in this profession by accident and I certainly never planned to be a music director or organist of any sort. Sometimes God plans things for you and you just go with it.
  • Important discernment question: is your struggle with the pastor, or with the congregation?

    If you and your pastor share a vision, but you have a difficult congregation, that's a challenge you can solve slowly, if you're willing to do the work to get there.

    If you and your pastor are at odds on vision, that's a situation that's unlikely to work out.

    Another question you could ask yourself is: is my disagreement with the pastor over vision or over strategy/tactics? If it's merely a disagreement about how to get where you want to go, that might be something you can work out. Disagreements on vision are in my opinion insurmountable.
  • CharlesCharles
    Posts: 12
    @contemporaryworship92

    TL;DR:
    I’ve barely spoken to our pastor, and that’s on me—but it’s also complicated by the fact that our parish rotates priests weekly across a vast territory. I’m on good terms with the vicar forane and the Polish priest, both of whom support my vision for sacred music and liturgical integrity, especially the use of chant and propers. The pastor, however, avoids certain worship sites entirely and has made abrupt decisions that undermine collaborative efforts, which makes me hesitant to approach him. I’ve experienced moments where my musical contributions were dismissed or overridden, and while I don’t have any direct conflict with him, we’re stuck in a kind of limbo. I stepped back from one site due to politics, and I suspect he misunderstood that as a full resignation. Still, the congregation has been receptive to traditional music, and I remain hopeful that the pastor might secretly value it too. I plan to stay local for the next five years, and I believe a direct conversation could help clarify things and possibly reignite a path toward leadership and liturgical renewal—if I can inspire him to embrace the summit of sacred music.



    Thank you for that idea. I never really discerned the situation in that light before. I am ashamed to say this, but I've barely spoken to the pastor. And I realize that's totally mea culpa.

    The tough scenario is that the priests that say mass at my church are different every week. Sometimes the pastor of our family of parishes says mass (we cover around 400 square miles nowadays). Sometimes the resident priest from Poland says mass, and sometimes the vicar forane comes from 40 miles away to say mass!

    I would say I'm on good terms with 2 out of those 3. Unfortunately, I am not well acquainted with the pastor because I never even know what Sundays he will say mass, thus, I don't see him often as I've been helping at other parishes simultaneously. I would say that I share a vision with both of those priests I mentioned. Whenever I serve at East Arcade, it is always the vicar forane saying mass, and because of his love of theology, we often end up talking about the liturgy after mass, and we have both agreed that the propers belong in the mass, and we should begin implementing them ASAP. When I serve at Holland, and the Polish Priest is there, he is always so friendly and supportive of the music ministry (especially on days when there's chant and latin), but I have not sat down to discuss things with him formally yet.

    The issue I continually face is that the pastor is pretty clear that he doesn't like to be at Arcade or Holland. He swore to never say mass at East Arcade again - five months in, it still holds up. I really want to talk to the pastor about music, but I don't wanna lie - I'm quite intimidated. It's not that I'm scared of him, it's more that I'm scared of how quickly he executes decisions, especially when they contradict what the majority voted for. As an example, I helped craft a new mass schedule in this former liturgy committee, and in seconds, he destroyed the work we spent hours doing. I also spoke to him before the Easter Sunday morning mass, and I asked if it would be alright that I proclaimed the Sequence in Latin (I emphasized this took me lots of time to rehearse), and then he instantly rejected me and sang it in Latin simultaneous with me - and in all respect, Fr. is not a strong singer whatsoever.
    It's the culmination of these little events that worry me about trying to further my musical involvement. The pastor will likely be around for many years to come, and I'm honestly not willing to collaborate with the antagonistic bluntness I've witnessed.


    Sorry for the barrage of anecdotes there. In short, I don't have any disagreements presently with the pastor, but I don't have any agreements either. We're in this conversational limbo. I resigned from the Arcade Worship Site because of church politics, and I think Fr. mistook that as a resignation from all parish worship sites. So, any time he sees me before or after mass, it's like a deer-in-the-headlights moment. The congregation is definitely not a major obstacle. When I played pre-Vatican II hymns and Latin at Arcade, it was incredibly well-received. I was only receiving about one "Lead me, Lord" request per month. My optimism tells me that the pastor secretly has a vision for sacred music returning to mass, and that Gregorian Chant is always subtly playing in the rectory, and that Fr keeps a copy of the Liber Usualis in his back pocket for emergencies - maybe it's just optimism though.

    Final paragraph, I promise.
    I see myself staying local to the parish for at least the next five years, so I guess a lot can happen in that time. Who knows, maybe I could reassume a leadership position at Arcade. What I'm dealing with now is just the mess of the Diocesan Road to Renewal, and the tangle of church dynamics in general. @contemporaryworship92 Perhaps scheduling a meeting with this pastor would clear the dust so I can stop speculating and start learning firsthand. I know that the other two priests would support my mission, but the pastor gets the final say-so, no matter what the other two will say - I have to succeed in inspiring the pastor to the summit of sacred music. The mass remains partially horizontal with sacro-pop, I believe singing plainsong and the propers would elevate our focus to be more vertical.
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 12,041
    I guess you could say I gave up. I retired about 5 years ago. I was tired of the soprano whose voice had aged beyond being able to sing - a fact known to everyone but her. Tired of the priests-performers who were all about themselves. Tired of the control freak who was musically illiterate but thought he knew everything. Tired of the old bat who wanted to run things so badly she had no qualms about knifing others in the back. Tired of the aged singer who wanted to restore music to her idealized version of what she thought it once was. It might have lived up to her vision in Rome but not in most parish churches. After hearing Roman singing it didn't live up to her vision, either. Then there was the pastor whose mind had gone to the point he could walk past half the people in the congregation and have no idea who they were. You can see that planning anything with someone like that would be an exercise in frustration. So once day I counted my pennies and realized I didn't have to do church music anymore. I was never obsessed with such but realized God had provided for me so generously I really never had to do anything again unless I just wanted to. It's nice being retired and I invite others to try it. You may never go back
  • wspinnenwspinnen
    Posts: 32
    I got my first full time DOM job after I finished my MM. I gave it up after one year.

    When the pastor hired me, they'd been without a DOM for a year. He had specific expectations of a candidate and I just so happened to check the boxes. It was a boost in my morale at the time. All that said, the situation I inherited turned out way worse than I was led on to believe.

    The program had to be completely rebuilt from scratch. The pastor and I worked together to try and draw interest, recruit, but nothing worked. During one recruitment, everyone laughed at me. At a ministry fair, I got the brunt of passive-aggressive sarcasm from old guard parishioners and 0 sign-ups. From what I gathered, the music director before me left a bad taste in their mouths. I think when I arrived, they concluded preemptively I was just going to be a repeat and so they mostly ignored me.

    The final straw was the closing of the parish school. The legacy families rode the pastor out of town on a rail. After taking a week off following Easter, I reflected and prayed about things, and realized, if our efforts as a staff to save the school failed, I can't expect my efforts to make a good music program to succeed, especially in light of my lukewarm reception.

    So, I quit. Thanks be to God, I found a decent job closer to home that's ok for now.

    There is merit to sticking it out, but sometimes, you have to quit for your own good.
  • Diapason84
    Posts: 140
    About two years ago, I left a position at a small northeast US parish. I had been the Sunday organist/cantor for one Mass for two years. The congregation was usually small (less than 30 people) and the parish probably should be closed for a variety of reasons.

    The business manager, who effectively acted as the pastor (a different matter in itself), had a musical background consisting of strumming guitar and singing, but that didn’t stop him from offering confident critiques. He'd throw around terms like "anthem" to describe such hymns as "Holy, Holy, Holy" and once dismissed a brief, 20th-century hymn in long meter as a "modern hymn with lots of verses." He was adamant that "Were you there?" was particularly NOT suited for Palm Sunday. It was like being evaluated by someone who skimmed a music dictionary once and decided he was Ted Marier.

    Given that the congregation barely picked up the missalettes, never mind singing anything except Haugen, Joncas and Schutte, I realized after a couple of years that repeating the same cycle of 6-7 hymns "just because we know them" was not a viable strategy, so I left on good terms. I am now at a parish that programs exclusively traditional hymns and English-ed chants, and am quite happy. The problem is that a new pastor could be appointed and throw everything out. I hope not.
    Thanked by 1CharlesW
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 12,041
    I have often thought there needs to be a secret organization that can dispatch pastors to the Land of Nod where they can no longer do any damage, spend the parish into debt, or teach self-aggrandizing nonsense. Oh well. Dream on.

    Our ancestors could do it but the civil authorities protect them these days. Although a little tar and feathers would do some of them good.

    You are quite correct that all it takes to destroy a music program that took years to build, is a new pastor and one week.


    Thanked by 3CHGiffen Charles tomjaw
  • irishtenoririshtenor
    Posts: 1,404
    The problem is that a new pastor could be appointed and throw everything out.

    This is why I am only an occasional organist and cantor now, rather than working full-time in the field.
    Thanked by 2tomjaw IanW
  • irishtenoririshtenor
    Posts: 1,404
    a little tar and feathers would do some of them good.

    I was thinking some tough gents of the Diocese of Charlotte might want to consider this tactic
  • Diapason84
    Posts: 140
    I was thinking some tough gents of the Diocese of Charlotte might want to consider this tactic


    Under the present pontificate, the replacement may be just as bad, or worse.
    Thanked by 2CharlesW tomjaw
  • Thanks all for this gold mine of a thread. It's helping my mental game a lot.

    My attitude is just leave when they stop paying you, or become likely to just fire you. I don't have much of a dog in the fight for convincing a parish or Cathedral about what they should want; that's like hanging a donut in front of a toddler and asking them to eat boiled broccoli. Instead, it's all about finding out as best possible in advance what their vision is and seeing how I can help them. Meanwhile, I just send my wife and kids to whatever FSSP parish the town has and stay professional. Back when I was a bachelor, a Tuesday afternoon Low Mass was enough to keep me rooted spiritually. Professionalism is supposed to help the church I'm serving way more than me, even if they don't always realize it.

    Always keep other irons in the fire and keep the resume brushed up, because even the best scenarios can randomly go belly-up for no reason in days, as I'm sure many in CMAA and CRCCM can attest. Have your six months' expenses saved up and keep an eye on the job listings at agohq.org, catholicjobs.com (rare truffles in there,) and here.
    Thanked by 1Charles
  • CharlesCharles
    Posts: 12
    @searchfgold6789

    I appreciate your boldness. It's become increasingly apparent that the pastor of my family of parishes does not share a vision for the music, and so, I will likely step down from even my volunteer role. Last week, I was out-of-the-blue called to provide music for mass outside a corn maze (sadly not in the corn maze!...), and even though the parishioners there repeatedly thanked me for the music I led, I won't bend over backwards and sideways to provide decent music if I am not paid to do so. It was a personal decision to shift to volunteering because I knew my schedule would no longer be fixed each week. Also, despite how much I promote doing things for God without necessitating pay, I am a college student that can you use those funds to deepen my education and resources for sacred music.

    I have been keeping "irons in the fire", but I find it difficult to "keep the resume brushed up". I have been attending daily mass many times a week whatever days I'm at college, but there is already a professional musician leading mass. I keep attending daily mass with the hopes that I'll meet him and perhaps be able to apprentice with him.
    Presently, all the other nearby parishes are overflowing with folk musicians, and there is nothing within 30 miles that doesn't already have a full staff. Every day, I practice singing Gregorian Chant alone, at the communion rail, in the empty basilica. I trust in God and His goodness, but I feel I cannot grow without a mentor. Sometime later this month, I plan to reach out to the Diocese of Buffalo Liturgical Commission to see if there are resources and people that could help teach me. I really, really, really want to learn about sacred music, chant, ecclesiastical latin, and the Vatican documents on the liturgy, but without any teacher, I am left to my own devices.
    Thanked by 1Chant_Supremacist
  • Didn't the CMAA just start a mentorship program? I recall reading something about it.

    I used to spend hours alone in church practicing chant too. On that note you should consider if you have a vocation to the religious life.
  • davido
    Posts: 1,150
    Charles if you are in diocese of Buffalo NY, you should make some connections with priests and music directors in Rochester NY. I know many wonderful people there who lead or sponsor solid music programs.
  • Liam
    Posts: 5,464
    Davido

    Sidebar question: I have close family south of ROC and will likely be relocating there in the next couple of years. Where are the solid music programs? (During my visits, I usually end up at St Louis in Pittsford or the Abbey of The Genesee.)
  • davido
    Posts: 1,150
    Sacred Heart Cathedral is very solid right now. St Anne’s on Mt Hope historically has had a good music program including choral music and Gregorian ordinaries. St Thomas the Apostle in Irodequoit where they have the TLM. Our Lady of Victory downtown has chant and traditional hymns.
    St Mary’s in Auburn has historically been good, I think there are forum members who directed there.
    I would bet on Peace of Christ parish based on who the pastor is.
  • Liam
    Posts: 5,464
    Thank you.
  • I will likely step down from even my volunteer role.


    Good for you for taking a bold step. Volunteerism can be a good thing. It can also lead to enablement and be bad in the long run for those involved. I guarantee you those in charge have the resources to do better in most situations.

    Sounds like money is tight, and you're in a well-documented wasteland, but you want mentorship and instruction. My advice would be to reach out to local groups like the AGO to see what scholarships might be available. You could also ear train yourself, or commute to a good choir. Listening to good classical music recordings on YT while following the score is also helpful. I'm talking about barebones stuff you can do until getting into a better situation. Many people here feel your frustration. Prayers it gets better.
    Thanked by 1Charles
  • AbbysmumAbbysmum
    Posts: 105
    My advice would be to reach out to local groups like the AGO to see what scholarships might be available.


    This is good advice. I found myself in a similar situation (wanting to grow, but needing mentorship) and I ended up being awarded a scholarship with the RCCO. I am now studying organ with said scholarship, and it's been a blessing.
    Thanked by 2irishtenor CHGiffen
  • I cannot argue with this. I'm a young part-time DM and Organist who was raised in a parish that became rather "anti-good-music" as I got older and entered my teenage years serving as an accompanist on piano and organ. The problem was not just that the DM and singers were not traditional in tastes, but that no one in the parish wanted upset the very nice but musically untalented folks providing the parish's weekly assortment of liturgical noise. Among that program, there was great resentment towards in-tune singing and rhythmically coherent use of the tambourine. So, when i began driving, I left.


    I began working at a few OCPish parishes with good choirs and found that my organ skills were actually appreciated, and that my traditional preferences were actually seen as valuable. Crazily enough, I ended up writing a fair amount of motet-y music for one of them, and they were open to it!

    Then, I got my first directing job at a small parish in San Francisco, and they as well were rather open to tradition-oriented change. We switched from piano to organ, and even began chanting the propers.

    Finally, where I am now: for a year and some change, I have directed music at a large, vibrant, mildly traditional parish where I have the privilege of conducting semi-paid choirs that sing a weekly rotation of polyphonic and chant ordinaries, sings my own compositions regularly, and, if anything, wishes to become EVEN MORE explicitly trad.

    The takeaway from this: Good liturgy is widely appreciated, but it takes someone with the right skills and goals to help a parish move in that direction. If you are somewhere where it is basically impossible to make change, LEAVE. You are valuable, but not there. Most parishes would be happy to have you. Giving up the wrong path is the first step to finding the right one.
  • francis
    Posts: 11,175
    You NEVER give up.

    You NEVER give in.

    But you must ALWAYS give…

    No matter the cost.



    Give them truth.

    Give them beauty.

    Give them goodness.



    In giving you will receive…

    From God alone…



    And even if you give your life…

    And in the end they take it all from you…

    You will have done…

    What Christ would also do.