Corpus Christi Watershed website is now subscription-based
  • contemporaryworship92
    Posts: 339
    What an interesting point you raise... my conversations with the USCCB indicated that regardless of their ultimate position on who owes them money (i.e. everyone), their interest—and what raises it to the level of involving the lawyers—is when their IP is sold without a licensing agreement in place. To this point CCW was free, therefore no money to squeeze out of a rock. Now that it is not free... could be interesting. I would ask him to remove the single setting I contributed 15 years ago, but he blocked me years ago. Oh well...


    Jeff may not have thought this through.

    Now that he is selling access to his site, the USCCB will likely demand that licensing fees be paid.
  • MatthewRoth
    Posts: 3,578
    Yeah, it's been years for me. Going on 3, if not more. I distinctly recall not seeing the posts, then I saw that I couldn't comment, and then I couldn't search for the page at all. I presume that I'm banned from his personal account too.

    Which, whatever, but I take exception to Jeff then using comments of mine from another group (whether I was right or wrong wasn't the point) to go on a rant about the topic on the blog, which I wouldn't see, because I am blocked from all of the social media: twitter too! That feels a bit personal!
Add a Comment