I took over the music ministry at my parish in 2023 and have spent the past two years navigating what feels like a full-scale rebuilding while the train is already moving. In that time, I’ve led a parish-wide transition to the new Source & Summit missals, worked to elevate the overall quality of sung liturgy (chant, antiphons, cantor formation, and ensemble discipline), and balanced this alongside directing a full school music program which involves teaching around 200 students, running a girls' schola and an after-school children's choir. Structurally, much has improved: clearer musical planning, stronger cantors, better preparation, more active participation among parishioners (!) and a more coherent liturgical sound week to week. On paper—and audibly—the ministry is healthier, more intentional, and more aligned with the Church’s vision for sung worship than when I arrived. All of this progress has not evolved without several battles along the way.
My ongoing frustration lies less with music-making and more with pastoral dynamics, particularly with an aging core of long-serving amateur singers. The adult choir is unhappy with change. They seem allergic to chant, and are appalled that I have effectively placed more emphasis on chant during the mass than sacred polyphony. They are feeling underused and clearly want a return to the way things were when past music directors were given vast latitude in programming whatever music merely sounded good to them. There is a sacred file cabinet in our choir loft that has over 70 years worth of legacy repertoire that is "languishing" because I refuse to use it. But why am I avoiding it? Mainly for practical reasons. We don't have a bass section, for one. The average age of our singers is now well over 60. They haven't had more than 13 singers since before the pandemic, and whenever we've been able to add someone new, they don't stay for very long.
Things seemed to be going smoothly as we prepared to begin Advent, but now I'm entrenched in an unfortunate upheaval that started with unsanctioned mass emails being sent between choir members and parish staff behind by back, gossip, back talk, and collective whining. It has brought an enormous amount of angst and stress to several people within our parish, and many were caught off guard by this because ... nobody anywhere in the parish is complaining about the choir.
While my competency and preparation have not been questioned, I increasingly sense a bias rooted in age and change-resistance rather than musical substance. Some singers appear to externalize their own natural vocal decline, stamina issues, or learning challenges and place responsibility on my leadership, as though my presence accelerated what time and biology inevitably bring. I care deeply about honoring their service and humanity, but I’m struggling to discern how to balance truth, charity, and forward momentum without either enabling denial or becoming the convenient scapegoat for loss. I’d be grateful for insight from those who have navigated similar transitions: how do you pastor aging musicians honestly, maintain artistic standards, and protect your own vocation from quiet erosion?
Have you considered some light rearranging of the polyphony?
I think of the creative reworkings of 16th and 17th century convents as a good example of what is possible. I’m not suggesting you go out and buy a viola da gamba tomorrow, but might a light organ accompaniment that supplies the bass line (with other parts taking over where an essential text is involved) do the trick?
The CD ‘Sacred Hearts, Secret Music’ may provide some inspiration.
You may want to schedule a one-on-one with the priest to discuss things in light of the recent drama. It depends on how serious/egregious it really is.
Why don't any of the people who join stick around?
I don't have too many aging voices, but I do have choir members who prefer polyphony to chant. I think a reasonable balance keeps them satisfied. I've also chatted with them in an informal way about the various reasons behind my repertoire selection, which don't all come down to my personal preferences (section limitations are part of it), and they've been understanding. Maybe I'm fortunate.
These days I always bring choir woes, stresses, and triumphs in prayer to the parish patron. In my case, St. Ann. Since I started doing this she has been extremely solicitous. It's funny, in a wry way, I've found she doesn't perceptibly assist with my personal supplications (which are probably selfish anyway), but if it has to do with the worthy glorification of her grandson she is right on it.
I inherited a similar situation when I was just starting out. The choir closet at that parish was full of "legacy repertoire" which the older members were extremely nostalgic for. It was acquired in a time when the choir (supposedly) had around 60 members back in the 80's and 90's. The older members always talked about that music and about the director who built that repertoire, who I'll simply refer to as "JT." JT was there for about 25 years, was verbally and emotionally abusive to both adult and children's choir members, but got a pass for it because "the music was great," and how I was doing things was always compared to JT's.
One day, the pastor got fed up with the nostalgia for JT and told me to go in the closet and get rid of the legacy repertoire, which I think was the best decision in our case. Purging it felt great, like I was ridding myself and my eventual successor of dead weight.
I went in and found that most of the music they were nostalgic for, was cheap, mass printed music from Protestant catalogs like Augsburg and Concordia. There was also a lot of Gordon Young and Owen Alstott. Some of the music was properly Catholic, but the scores were in terrible condition and not worth saving.
I should also add, I had to wear a mask in that closet because of the amount of dust and dirt, and I had to wash those clothes twice.
A good pastor won't let his music director be walked on and mistreated, and I hope you have that support from yours. Definitely bring these problems to his attention and don't let it discourage you from continuing what you've accomplished. What I learned from my story and being compared to JT, is that no matter how well you do things, how hard you try, someone's going to give you a difficult time; it's no reflection of who you are as a person.
The Rosary will be your best "weapon" in this situation.
I had one-on-one interviews with every member of a choir I inherited. I'd been forewarned that they would be challenging. I also checked their range (just sing America for me; start wherever it's comforatable). Two out of eighteen quit on the spot, and there were very few problems over the course of four years with those who stayed on. The problem was the priest, and it was worse with his replacement. The choir begged me not to go, but I knew this was a priest I couldn't / wouldn't work with.
Sounds to me like your adult choir is grieving, both their personal losses / aging, and also due to structural change in the church (abuse crisis effects, aging clergy leading to inevitable change, etc).
It's your pastor's job to pastor them. Your job is to deliver a music programme for the church. Of course that requires some care on your part, but be clear that your care is directed to enabling them to contribute to the music programme, it's not wide-ranging.
I'd keep the adult choir as part of the mix - and look to start some new initiatives that need to share the air-time that the adult choir get, eg a youth choir, or chamber chant group. Maybe some in your adult choir are ready to graduate to being in the funeral choir only?
Make sure that your relationships with the pastor, secretary, janitor and other significant people (whoever matters in your scenario) are solid enough not to be damaged by bouts of ranting.
To participate in the discussions on Catholic church music, sign in or register as a forum member, The forum is a project of the Church Music Association of America.