Choir/Cantor Question
  • Hello everyone,

    Recently we got a new choir director who is really gifted and dedicated, and a joy to sing with. I have felt some frustration with fellow choir members, some of whom have not been coming to rehearsal or to the choir loft to sing since the change in leadership. Particularly frustrating is one choir member who hasn't been to any rehearsals nor sung with the choir, but is scheduled to cantor when the choir director can't make it. Perhaps it's just me, but I think that you're a choir member first and foremost. It doesn't seem fair that someone who won't sing with the choir or rehearse with us should be allowed to cantor. What say you?
    Thanked by 1Don9of11
  • GambaGamba
    Posts: 641
    That sounds like a problem for the new director.
    Thanked by 1Jeffrey Quick
  • Don9of11Don9of11
    Posts: 803
    I have been singing for almost 50 years, and I have worked with volunteers and professionals both. I've also spent a number of years in the role of cantor. The new comer should try and practice with the choir out of respect, but it is not necessary if they are a professionals. It's really a problem for you new choir director, I wouldn't let it bother you too much.
  • irishtenoririshtenor
    Posts: 1,404
    This would be up to the director / the pastor. I worked as a professional musician for more than a decade and I don't sing in the parish choir. I cantor whenever they can't find someone. Just show up and do it. I hope no one in the choir takes offense at what I'm able to offer the parish
    Thanked by 1Abbysmum
  • Liam
    Posts: 5,464
    The practice certainly is in tension with the development of the choir, and an experienced choir director should know that. But it's a decision for the director.
    Thanked by 2CHGiffen Birdsong
  • Blending and leading are two different skills.

    Someone with the ability to cantor is not necessarily a good choral singer. Similarly, many choir members are not suitable to cantor.
    Thanked by 1Abbysmum
  • Thank you, everyone. I am well aware that this is for the music director to decide-- I certainly wasn't planning on doing or saying anything about it. I have sung in several choirs and always respect the director and fellow choir members. I have participated in choirs with both amateurs and professionals, and the professionals come to rehearsals.

    I am lamenting the fact that several choir members, including this person who is going to cantor, have only left since the new director assumed leadership. We barely have anyone in the choir loft and need all the help we get. The person in question was in the choir loft pretty much every Sunday, and sometimes at the Saturday Vigil. I think that both the new director and the choir deserve better. It bothers me that this person is only willing to cantor when the director can't make it. I recall reading once where a choir director said that he didn't have choir, but a choir loft full of soloists.

    It does seem that, for both Catholics and Protestants, getting a good, solid choir together is far more difficult now than in the past, for a myriad of reasons.

  • I also want to clarify that I am not in any way criticizing the director for choosing to allow this. A director has to work with the people they have. It just saddens me that it's so difficult to get a decent sized choir together.
  • AbbysmumAbbysmum
    Posts: 105
    A director has to work with the people they have. It just saddens me that it's so difficult to get a decent sized choir together.


    There's lots a play here. Some of it is the lack of music education generally - kids are not growing up in a culture of music. Our school's music teacher teachers 0.5 at our school, and 0.5 at a secular public school, and she says that the kids at the other school just... don't sing. It's not that they can't, they just don't. They don't come from homes or religious backgrounds that encourage singing. Kids that don't sing grow up into adults who also don't sing.

    The other part is volunteerism, or lack thereof. My paid "day job" is working for an organization that relies on volunteers to help run our events. Every year, it's becoming increasingly difficult to find volunteers to the point where they're considering offering cash incentives for volunteering for a certain number of hours. Every organization that relies on volunteer labour is in a similar position. My boss chalks it up, at least in part, to a combination of households where both parents work outside the home (so, no parent at home to help out), burnout, and a lack of a sense of civic duty (doing it because your community needs you).
  • Birdsong
    Posts: 11
    Very good points, Abbysmum, particularly on volunteerism. I know several women who sing very well in my parish, but have zero interest in joining the choir. One woman's excuse is that she want to sit with her husband. The problem is that parishioners want a good choir, but no one is willing to join it. Good choirs don't just happen on their own, after all.
  • AbbysmumAbbysmum
    Posts: 105
    I know several women who sing very well in my parish, but have zero interest in joining the choir.


    That's the other part. Choral singing is a skill that needs to be nurtured and practiced. Someone who "sings very well" might not be suited to singing in a choir! I am very often the person who end up working with new recruits to teach them the basic skills so they *can* be successful. It's more than just getting bodies in the loft (but it goes without saying that that would be the first step lol) - it's daunting if people don't already have the skill set.

    Of course, you could just invite her husband to join the choir too. ;)
    Thanked by 1CHGiffen
  • I know several women who sing very well in my parish, but have zero interest in joining the choir. One woman's excuse is that she want to sit with her husband. The problem is that parishioners want a good choir, but no one is willing to join it. Good choirs don't just happen on their own, after all.


    This can be more complicated than you realize. I stopped attending parish events because I got tired of being asked why I’m not in the choir and having to come up with a charitable reason that a) isn’t a lie, b) isn’t going to cause scandal, or c) doesn’t require me to detract against our MD. He doesn’t want me there, and I don’t want to sing contemporary music.

    Please respect people who say they don’t want to be in the choir and don’t make judgements about them. You may not know the entire story.
  • irishtenoririshtenor
    Posts: 1,404
    @SponsaChristi -- do you think that if you told people why you're not in the choir that the MD would quit? And that, if he quit, he would stop attending Mass entirely? Sounds like he might not be the most stable guy
    Thanked by 1MatthewRoth
  • Liam
    Posts: 5,464
    Also, American Catholics in the pews - not benefitting from the historically strong cultural singing habits of Lutherans, Methodists, or Episcopalians (let alone Anglicans) - are greatly helped in their congregational singing by having able voices dotting the middle of the church. And choir directors should learn to appreciate that if they don't already.

    And then there's the issue that most people have mezzo or baritone voices (IIRC, something like ~60% of women and men, respectively) rather than SATB voices properly speaking, and may have a good intuition that they are better off not being forced into SATB compromises (e.g., the problem of the seeming baritenor singing T parts to which his voice is not actually suited...esp if there's a tenor music director who considers baritones simply to be lazy tenors...and those guys are out there.)
    Thanked by 1Abbysmum
  • @SponsaChristi -- do you think that if you told people why you're not in the choir that the MD would quit? And that, if he quit, he would stop attending Mass entirely?

    I don’t know. Our MD is competent and good at what he does. He’s also well-respected in the choral community. People don’t need to know why I’m not in the choir. People should just respect that I’m not in it and just respect that boundary and leave it be. They can wait until the Final Judgement to find out. Church people are too nosey and gossipy.
  • Liam
    Posts: 5,464
    Preach!

    When pressed, I've said "I love supporting congregational singing from the pews", and in other contexts when pressed by people wanting me to join a choir whose repertoire would not sustain my commitment, I learned to be direct and say "Thank you kindly, but the repertoire here would not sustain my commitment." (I won't go so far as to say what's underneath that: I did my time in solid service in the trenches of Missalette Beige repertoire, but wasn't sustained by it for the long run and have no interest in revisiting it.)
    Thanked by 1Abbysmum
  • PaxMelodious
    Posts: 469
    Thank you Liam "the repertoire here would not sustain my commitment" is a GREAT phrase.

    And it applies across genres too: At this point in my life, the repertoire that many posters here cherish would not sustain my commitment to learning it!


    I have a real issue with regarding wanting to be with family as a poor excuse for not joining the choir. The primary church for all of us in the domestic one. Family should always be the first commitment, IMHO.
    Thanked by 2Liam CHGiffen
  • Liam
    Posts: 5,464
    PM

    To clarify: I'd feel the same way with a repertoire that was *exclusively* from the Kyriale and Graduale, as it were.
  • MatthewRoth
    Posts: 3,212
    That’s our repertoire but that was also for lack of the right personnel. Two years ago, we struggled to sightread even just the Grassi Magnificat verses. We did it this week, and bam, it’s definitely happening for a major feast before year’s end.

    We want the schola men to do polyphony and part singing, not for the schola as such to also do that because we want to move from strength to strength without undermining the chant that we need to execute weekly or more often and without overcommitting to polyphony. But had more people capable of such singing joined earlier, we’d have done more earlier!
  • jcr
    Posts: 148
    This whole issue is a terrible hornet's nest of trouble for a Music Director. There is no doubt that "ringers" enhance the quality of what one can do with a choir and particularly what one can do in a given period of time. However, one must be very careful on several different levels when using them. Many are the singers who become offended for several reasons. If there are singers with musical skills and who sing well they may become offended as they see their opportunities to use their solo skills diminished. Others, whose skills might be at any level just get offended because they interpret it as a judgment that they aren't good enough and sometimes stomp off to be seen no more. Some become offended because the new guy contradicts what the previous guy had to say about almost anything or, worse yet, those who are studying singing with someone else become offended because they are studying with someone from a different school of vocal pedagogy of which there is a staggering number! Often there is a problem with spousal cooperation. Most often it is the wife, but it also goes the other way, who wants family togetherness at worship. I recall one situation where room was made in the choir area for a tenor's wife and several children to sit with him during Mass (yes, really!). These things require patience, long suffering, keeping our mouths shut when we really don't want to and, most of all prayer in order to solve the incredible tangle of complication these things can cause. Each case has its own face and complications and each has to be solved or not on its own terms. When Nietsche said, "Hell is other people", although I certainly don't agree with him, I understand the problem he was talking about.
    Thanked by 1Abbysmum
  • trentonjconn
    Posts: 772
    When Nietsche said, "Hell is other people", although I certainly don't agree with him, I understand the problem he was talking about.


    Sartre!
  • Liam
    Posts: 5,464
    Sartre was talking about Nietzche.
    Thanked by 1trentonjconn
  • AbbysmumAbbysmum
    Posts: 105
    People don’t need to know why I’m not in the choir. People should just respect that I’m not in it and just respect that boundary and leave it be.


    This reminds me of the adage, "No is a complete sentence". You do not need to justify your participation or lack thereof in the choir. Good job keeping your boundaries!
  • jcr
    Posts: 148
    Sorry for the wrong credit! I stand by the point, though!
    Thanked by 1trentonjconn