Hymn text on the four Marian dogmas: "Blessed Mary Ever-Virgin"
  • Grace and peace, everyone! It is the ex-Anglican newbie again.

    Here is a Marian text I wrote, meter 8.7.8.7.8.7. I rather like it with GRAFTON; it also works with ST. THOMAS (Wade) and PANGE LINGUA, though the latter may well be what I call a "married tune"---something with which a text-writer does not mess. See what you think.

    1. Blessed Mary ever-Virgin,
    Rose of Israel in full bloom,
    Mother to a world of sinners,
    Theotokos, in Your womb
    Christ of all the starry heavens
    Came to make His earthly home.

    2. Sinless one at Your conception,
    Born to Joachim and Anne,
    Never has a sweeter maiden
    Lived on earth since time began;
    Who else could have borne our Jesus,
    Very God and very Man?

    3. Virgin when betrothed to Joseph,
    Virgin still in cattle-stall,
    Virgin as Our Lord grew daily,
    Virgin when He raised His call,
    Virgin witness to His Passion,
    Virgin Mother of us all:

    4. When Your earthly life was ended,
    Soul and body pure as light
    Were assumed by God to Heaven;
    O what splendor! O what might!
    How the angels bade You welcome,
    How the saints sang their delight!

    5. Now you reign as Queen of Heaven,
    Light of Brother Sun Your gown,
    Sister Moon Your path illumines
    And twelve stars adorn Your crown;
    Whirling planets pause in greeting,
    Countless galaxies bow down.

    6. Blessed Mary ever-Virgin,
    Pray our Father grant this grace:
    May our souls give birth to Jesus;
    Make our lives His dwelling-place
    Till like stars we rise to meet Him
    And behold Him face to face.

    (c) 2020 Anna Bendiksen (1969-)
  • Don9of11Don9of11
    Posts: 805
    May I ask what source did you use for the basis of the verses?
    Thanked by 1Anna_Bendiksen
  • Anna, this is a stunning text. I was particularly arrested by verse 5, although I quite love verse 3 as well. Really drives home Her perpetual virginity quite well.
    Thanked by 1Anna_Bendiksen
  • Gorgeous!

    This is certainly just a matter of stylistic preference but I wonder if your second line could be instead: "Israel's Rose in fullest bloom" - which would keep the accented syllable "full" on beat 1.

    Not sure why I don't like this but "Manifesting loving might" seemed a little awkward.

    "And twelve stars" - how about "twelve bright stars"?

    Thanked by 1Anna_Bendiksen
  • May I ask what source did you use for the basis of the verses?


    How horribly inadequate is the answer, "an RCIA video"...

    Anna, this is a stunning text. I was particularly arrested by verse 5, although I quite love verse 3 as well. Really drives home Her perpetual virginity quite well.


    ServiamScores, thank you so much; you are very kind.

    Gorgeous!

    This is certainly just a matter of stylistic preference but I wonder if your second line could be instead: "Israel's Rose in fullest bloom" - which would keep the accented syllable "full" on beat 1.

    Not sure why I don't like this but "Manifesting loving might" seemed a little awkward.

    "And twelve stars" - how about "twelve bright stars"?


    Thank you so much, m_r_taylor. Nice catch on the "manifesting" line, and I also appreciate your picking up on the other two examples. I would not amend this to "twelve bright stars" because I think that "bright" in such an instance is a bit redundant. (Perhaps one would have to make such a distinction in the presence of Darth Vader, but here...) I'm going to have to ponder this further.
  • Don9of11Don9of11
    Posts: 805
    Anna_Bendiksen,

    How horribly inadequate is the answer, "an RCIA video"...


    Might I suggest the following PDF as a resource Popular Marian Hymn in Devotion and Liturgy Its from the University of Dayton's Marian Collection, you may already have this. It provides a study of Marian hymnody from the 19th and early 20th centuries and resources for composers/ authors interested in writing Marian hymns for todays Liturgy.
  • Don9of11, thank you so much!! I certainly had no idea that that existed. I am indebted to you.

    One of the most interesting aspects of all of this is learning how to discern what to do with each idea that comes to me. For example, I am working right now on a Marian text to a very well-known tune that has been used in congregational singing, but in my opinion should not be because of its comparatively wide range. The whole Catholic singer-songwriter thing being so.not.me., I will have a piece best suited to performance in my own living room. And this too is good and true and beautiful. The power of the domestic church must not be underestimated.
    Thanked by 1Don9of11
  • CHGiffenCHGiffen
    Posts: 5,274
    My original 87. 87. 87 tune BEAUDRY was recently revised with expanded metre 87. 87. D (and used for NihilNominis' "The Beatific Vision"). I just adapted the revision back to 87. 87. 87 metre, now called BEAUDRY NEW.

    Here it is, set with Anna's lovely Marian text "Blessed Mary ever-Virgin" -enjoy!
    Giffen-Blessed Mary ever-Virgin (Beaudry New).pdf
    95K
    Giffen-Blessed Mary ever-Virgin-sound.mp3
    5M
  • CHGiffen, as my Methodist relatives used to say:

    Holy.Toledo.
    Thanked by 1CHGiffen
  • CHGiffenCHGiffen
    Posts: 5,274
    Anna, as one who was raised a Methodist, before finding my way to the Catholic church via a (high) Episcopal church ages ago, I understand what your Methodist relatives used to say! Thank you, so much.
    Thanked by 1Anna_Bendiksen
  • TCJ
    Posts: 1,041
    At the current rate, there will be a new CMAA Hymnal out in about three months.
  • At the current rate, there will be a new CMAA Hymnal out in about three months.


    Willt thou forgive that hymn, where I begun,
    which is my hymn, though it were sung before?
    Wilt thou forgive those hymns through which I run,
    and do run still, though still I do deplore?
    When thou hast done,
    thou hast not done,
    For I have more.
  • Your hymnody (and that of NIhilNominus) is superb. Both should find a prominent place in Catholic hymnals. Have you considered sending your work to any of them?
  • Your hymnody (and that of NIhilNominus) is superb. Both should find a prominent place in Catholic hymnals. Have you considered sending your work to any of them?


    How kind of you! Thank you!

    I have considered this and would be interested to hear recommendations by message or email.
  • Don9of11Don9of11
    Posts: 805
    The following Marian tune would work if there was a refrain. Daughter of a Mighty Father. Daily, Daily Sing to Mary might work but not quite.
  • Here is a version with Thee/Thou set to ST. THOMAS, just in time for the Feast of the Immaculate Conception.
    Blessed Mary Ever-Virgin.pdf
    41K
    Thanked by 2CHGiffen Heath
  • Carol
    Posts: 856
    Your text is so well crafted! How long did you work to make each syllable so powerful?
    Thanked by 1Anna_Bendiksen
  • Heath
    Posts: 988
    Anna, beautiful!

    Two quick things, if I may:

    1) It makes everyone's life easier when it's just one page rather than 1+...any chance you could make it a tad smaller so it all fits on one page?

    2) Is that a variant ending on ST THOMAS? I was surprised when I got to those last couple measures. Might I suggest changing to the more common ending so folks in the pews won't get left behind?

    Again, so lovely, well done!
    Thanked by 1Anna_Bendiksen
  • Thanks so much, Carol and Heath.

    Carol, the truth is that I don't remember exactly. I do remember that I wanted a stanza for each dogma plus an intro and conclusion. Things tend to come to me all at once, then get tweaked for a few weeks afterward, and I'm thinking that's probably what occurred with this.

    Heath---I think this variant came from the 1940 Episcopal Hymnal. I do not have a harmonized version of the variant most Catholics know. I could give it a shot on my own, or perhaps someone here can help. I'll see if I can shrink it, too.
    Thanked by 1Heath
  • Carol
    Posts: 856
    I don't have much opportunity to talk about newly created sacred music. I do hear a LOT of secular singer-wongwriter stuff and the obvious lack of time spent crafting those lyrics is my pet peeve. Inspiration is only a fraction of the job.

    Be sure to get an ironclad copyright on this piece.
    Thanked by 1Anna_Bendiksen
  • Heath
    Posts: 988
    Anna, hymnary.org will have LOTS of harmonizations of that last phrase if you'd like to peruse! :)
    Thanked by 1Anna_Bendiksen
  • Anna, this is a wonderful text! Thank you so much.

    As a convert from Anglicanism who grew up memorizing The Hymnal 1940, I sailed right through the ending and did not even notice the version of the final phrase until Heath pointed it out--and we sing Tantum ergo to St. Thomas about once a month and I am apparently *finally* comfortable with the non-1940 ending!
  • Anna, I just wanted to thank you again for this gem of a text. We are singing it to St. Thomas this coming Friday. I'm looking forward to it. (I almost paired it with Alleluia Dulce Carmen, but decided to restrain myself, lol.)
    Thanked by 1Anna_Bendiksen
  • Hooray!! You are very welcome! If you get a recording, I'd love to link to it on my website (actually I'd love to link to your church on my website if you perform this, with or without a recording).
  • Oh yes, go for it! (I doubt we will end up with a good recording; I rarely use my own equipment to make a recording, and our livestreams present rather poorly, if I'm being honest.) Regardless, there's no doubt we are singing it; I have 200 worship aids printing as I type. The church is St. John the Evangelist Catholic Church, Goshen, IN.
    Thanked by 1Anna_Bendiksen
  • @Heath and others, here is a redacted version on one page. I am sorry it's taken me a bit. Although I am not a music director, I have had a crazy week!
    Blessed Mary Ever-Virgin.mp3
    453K
    Blessed Mary Ever-Virgin.pdf
    29K
    Thanked by 1CHGiffen
  • Bump!
  • 6. Blessed Mary ever-Virgin,
    Theotokos, grant this grace:

    This line is theologically problematic. Mary intercedes for us; God grants us graces.
    Thanked by 1Anna_Bendiksen
  • I've created a new line (see above).
    Thanked by 1CHGiffen
  • francis
    Posts: 11,212
    Actually, that may be theologically, correct. Mary is the dispenser of all graces. Also, Mary and the church are synonymous, and the church dispenses grace through sacraments. Now, I am not a theologian. But if there are any here, they should definitely chime in. Especially somebody versed in Marian theology.

    Our Lady of Grace appeared to Saint Catherine of Laboure… she specifically spoke about being the dispenser of grace.

    THE SECOND APPARITION
    Mary gave her this mission in a vision during evening meditation on November 27, 1830. She saw Mary standing on what seemed to be a globe and holding a golden globe in her hands as if offering it to heaven. “The ball which you see represents the whole world, especially France, and each person in particular.”

    The times were difficult in France, especially for the poor. France was first to experience many of those troubles which ultimately reached other parts of the world. Streaming from rings on Mary’s fingers as she held the globe were many rays of light. “These rays symbolize the graces I shed upon those who ask for them. The gems from which rays do not fall are the graces for which souls forget to ask.”

    Here is an authoritative explanation by none other than Fr. Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange, TAKEN FROM THE THREE AGES OF THE INTERIOR LIFE, VOL. 1, chapter 6
    Imprimatur and Nihil Obstat, 1948
    Original French edition © The Dominican Province, France.
    English translation © Baronius Press Ltd

    https://onepeterfive.com/on-mary-as-mediatrix-of-all-graces-by-fr-reginald-garrigou-lagrange/
    Thanked by 1CHGiffen
  • GerardH
    Posts: 630
    Mary and the church are synonymous

    I'm no theologian either, but that seems patently false.
  • Mary is the dispenser of all graces.

    That’s not entirely true. Mary could not have dispensed the graces she received to herself.

  • francis
    Posts: 11,212
    Out to defend her honor...

    "Mary, spouse of the Holy Spirit" is a title used in Christian devotion, especially Catholic tradition, to describe Mary's unique, intimate, and miraculous relationship with the Holy Spirit, stemming from her virginal conception of Jesus, symbolizing her perfect openness to God's will, not a literal marriage but a spiritual espousal, akin to how religious sisters call Jesus their spouse. It highlights the Spirit's creative role in her motherhood, her Immaculate Conception, and her perpetual virginity, making her a model for the Church's receptivity to God's Spirit.


    Yes, Mary is deeply synonymous with the Catholic Church, seen as the Mother of God, the Mother of the Church, a supreme model of faith, and a powerful intercessor, with countless churches and devotions centered on her, reflecting her essential, inseparable role alongside Christ in salvation history and the Church's spiritual life. While not divine herself, her "yes" to God made the Incarnation possible, and her spiritual motherhood extends to all believers, making her a unique figure of veneration and emulation.
    Key Reasons for Her Connection to the Church:

    Mother of Christ: She bore Jesus, the Son of God, making her the Mother of God (Theotokos).
    Mother of the Church: As the Mother of Christ, she is also the Mother of His Mystical Body, the Church, a title formally declared by Pope Paul VI.
    Theotokos (God-Bearer): Her role in bringing Christ into the world makes her central to Christian theology and worship.
    Model of Faith: Mary is the ultimate example of obedience, love, and submission to God's will, inspiring believers to emulate her.
    Spiritual Motherhood: Her spiritual motherhood extends to all humanity, as she co-operates with love in forming believers.
    Central in Scripture & Tradition: Her presence at pivotal moments like the Annunciation, the Wedding at Cana, and Pentecost solidifies her importance.

    How This is Seen in Practice:

    Veneration: Catholics honor Mary with numerous titles (Queen of Heaven, Our Lady of...) and feast days.
    Churches: Thousands of churches worldwide are dedicated to her.
    Mariology: The study of Mary (Mariology) is a significant part of Catholic theology, alongside Petrine doctrine (related to St. Peter).

    In essence, Mary is not just a historical figure but a living, vital part of the Church's identity and spiritual life, symbolizing its own maternal role in bringing Christ to the world.



    For a greater understanding of her role in the life of a Catholic, read this...

    https://www.montfort.org/content/uploads/pdf/PDF_EN_26_1.pdf

    pertinent excerpt...

    25. God the Holy Spirit entrusted his wondrous gifts to Mary, his faithful spouse, and chose her as the dispenser of all he possesses, so that she distributes all his gifts and graces to whom she wills, as much as she wills, how she wills and when she wills. No heavenly gift is given to men which does not pass through her virginal hands. Such indeed is the will of God, who has decreed that we should have all things through Mary, so that, making herself poor and lowly,, and hiding herself in the depths of nothingness during her whole life, she might be enriched, exalted and honoured by almighty God. Such are the views of the Church and the early Fathers.

    26. Were I speaking to the so-called intellectuals of today, I would prove at great length by quoting Latin texts taken from Scripture and the Fathers of the Church all that I am now stating so simply. I could also instance solid proofs which can be read in full in Fr. Poiré’s book "The Triple Crown of the Blessed Virgin". But I am speaking mainly for the poor and simple who have more good will and faith than the common run of scholars. As they believe more simply and more meritoriously, let me merely state the truth to them quite plainly without bothering to quote Latin passages which they would not understand. Nevertheless, I shall quote some texts as they occur to my mind as I go along.

    27. Since grace enhances our human nature and glory adds a still greater perfection to grace, it is certain that our Lord remains in heaven just as much the Son of Mary as he was on earth. Consequently he has retained the submissiveness and obedience of the most perfect of all children towards the best of all mothers. We must take care, however, not to consider this dependence as an abasement or imperfection in Jesus Christ. For Mary, infinitely inferior to her Son, who is God, does not command him in the same way as an earthly mother would command her child who is beneath her. Since she is completely transformed in God by that grace and glory which transforms all the saints in him, she does not ask or wish or do anything which is contrary to the eternal and changeless will of God. When therefore we read in the writings of Saint Bernard, Saint Bernardine, Saint Bonaventure, and others that all in heaven and on earth, even God himself, is subject to the Blessed Virgin, they mean that the authority which God was pleased to give her is so great that she seems to have the same power as God. Her prayers and requests are so powerful with him that he accepts them as commands in the sense that he never resists his dear mother's prayer because it is always humble and conformed to his will.


    I don't want to hijack this thread... if you really want to know more, contact me.
    Thanked by 2CHGiffen hilluminar
  • francis
    Posts: 11,212
    That’s not entirely true. Mary could not have dispensed the graces she received to herself.
    well, you are limiting your assertion only from the perspective of earthly matter and chronological time. That is a very narrow view.
  • well, you are limiting your assertion only from the perspective of earthly matter and chronological time. That is a very narrow of view.

    I’m not trying to denigrate Mary, but we need to separate Marian dogmas, popular piety, and private revelation.

    I’m just reiterating what the Church said in Mater Populi Fidelis . While the Church doesn’t strictly forbid the use of the title “Mediatrix of All Graces”, it has to be properly understood, and so far I’m not seeing that people have a proper understanding of what that means.
    Link to full document here: https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_ddf_doc_20251104_mater-populi-fidelis_en.html#_Toc201667051

    67. Some titles, such as “Mediatrix of All Graces,” have limits that do not favor a correct understanding of Mary’s unique place. In fact, she, the first redeemed, could not have been the mediatrix of the grace that she herself received. This is not a minor point since it reveals something central: even in Mary’s case, the gift of grace precedes her and comes from the absolutely free initiative of the Trinity in view of Christ’s merits. Like all of us, she did not merit her justification by a preceding action of her own,[172] nor did she do so by any subsequent action.[173] Even in Mary’s case, her friendship with God by grace is always freely bestowed. Her cherished figure is the supreme testimony of the believing receptivity of one who, more than anyone else, opened herself with docility and complete trust to Christ’s work, and who, at the same time, stands as the greatest sign of the transforming power of that grace.

    68. On the other hand, the title “Mediatrix of All Graces” risks presenting Mary as the one who distributes spiritual goods or energies apart from our personal relationship with Jesus Christ. Nevertheless, the term “graces,” when seen in reference to Mary’s maternal help at various moments in our lives, can have an acceptable meaning. The plural form expresses all the aids — even material — that the Lord may grant us when he heeds his Mother’s intercession. These helps, in turn, prepare our hearts to open to God’s love. In this way, Mary, as Mother, has a presence in the daily lives of the faithful that is far greater than the closeness any other saint could have.

    69. Through her intercession, Mary can implore God to grant us those internal impulses of the Holy Spirit that are called “actual graces.” These are the aids given by the Holy Spirit that operate even in sinners to prepare them for justification,[174] and that encourage those already justified by sanctifying grace to further growth. It is in this specific sense that the title “Mother of Grace” must be understood. She humbly cooperates so that we may open our hearts to the Lord, who alone can justify us through the action of sanctifying grace: that is, when God pours his Trinitarian life into us, dwells in us as a Friend, and makes us sharers in his divine life. This is exclusively the Lord’s own work. At the same time, it does not preclude the possibility that the words, images or various prompts that we receive through Mary’s maternal intercession might help us to persevere in life, to prepare our hearts for the grace that the Lord infuses, or to grow in the life of grace that we have freely received.

    70. These aids that come from the Lord are presented to us with a maternal aspect, filled with the tenderness and closeness of the Mother whom Jesus wanted to share with us (cf. Jn 19:25-28). In this way, Mary carries out a unique activity to help us open our hearts to Christ and to his sanctifying grace, which elevates us and heals us. Whenever she brings us various “motions,” these should always be understood as promptings to open our lives to the One who alone works in our innermost being.
    Thanked by 1GerardH
  • francis
    Posts: 11,212
    Well well well! This writing is how many years old?? O… wait… months? O for church’s sake! Weeks???????? (I did hear some great murmuring when this came out, but I have not taken the time to read it) and now I see where you have bought into the phrase which you quoted to me above.

    Many SAINTS (including numerous popes not limited to those mentioned innumerable times in the papal documents of Pius IX, Leo XIII, Saint Pius X, Benedict XV, Pius XI, and Pius XII) have confessed and professed the contrary... for CENTURIES, backed by saints from MORE centuries.

    So when you say “the church said”, what happens to the slightly overlooked part about “what the church has ALWAYS said”?!

    I’m not trying to denigrate Mary, but
    I would be very careful about challenging what the church has always professed. And I certainly must say that we must be very careful to never ever approach any kind of speech that might border on blasphemy against the Virgin Mary.
  • Elmar
    Posts: 516
    What you are saying seems to imply that the (cited part of) the "Doctrinal Note on Some Marian Titles Regarding Mary’s Cooperation in the Work of Salvation", titled Mater Populi Fidelis, signed by pope Leo XIV on October 7th, 2025 and published by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith on November 4th, 2025 contradicts in essential ways what
    Many SAINTS (including numerous popes not limited to those mentioned innumerable times in the papal documents of Pius IX, Leo XIII, Saint Pius X, Benedict XV, Pius XI, and Pius XII) have confessed and professed
    for CENTURIES, backed by saints from MORE centuries
    Just to make sure what exactly you mean to say, also by
    what happens to the slightly overlooked part about “what the church has ALWAYS said
    in relation to aforementioned dictrinal note.
  • francis
    Posts: 11,212
    @Elmar

    Here is a small sample from the many documents and professions of Mary as Mediatrix. I can provide you with many more. This one bears the weight of Pope Leo the XIII and Saint Bernardine of Siena.
    So Pope Leo XIII, Lucunda Semper Expectatione, said:

    "... when He [the Father] has been invoked with excellent prayers, our humble voice turns to Mary; in accordance with no other law than that law of conciliation and petition which was expressed as follows by St. Bernardine of Siena : 'Every grace that is communicated to this world has a threefold course. For by excellent order, it is dispensed from God to Christ, from Christ to the Virgin, from the Virgin to us.'"

    Are you saying that this is no longer the case? Are you saying that what the church (in this case, Pope Leo XIII and St. Bernardine) has always said about Our Lady as Mediatrix is no longer true?

    More from Leo XIII
    Leo XIII, in the text referred to, spoke of her, as we saw above, as having "practically limitless power." St. Pius X said she was the "dispensatrix of all the gifts, and is the "neck" connecting the Head of the Mystical Body to the Members. But all power flows through the neck. Pius XII said "Her kingdom is as vast as that of her Son and God, since nothing is excluded from her dominion." These and many other texts speak in varied ways of Mary as Mediatrix of all graces, so often that the teaching has become infallible.

    This subject is inexhaustible in history. Are you saying this one document that came out weeks ago puts what every pope and Saint has said about Our Lady in the category of null and void?

    aforementioned dictrinal note.
    I know you did not intend to misspell “doctrinal”… but you’re misspelling is somewhat amusingly revealing.

    NOTE TO MODERATOR
    Perhaps the content discussing Mary as Mediatrix Could be turned into a new thread? I would like to answer People’s concerns, And have directed them to contact me personally, but it seems some wish to discuss it on the forum. Most humbly, FK
    IMG_1609.png
    352 x 500 - 16K