"Synthetic Scotch, Synthetic Commanders"
...acoustic demands and to the liturgical reforms of the Second Vatican Council.
"What.... are you trying to be more Catholic than the Pope? Are you a stuck-up elitist....[fill in the rest of the laundry list]?
I am genuinly curious as to whether folks think that having a (presumably) high-quality electronic organ is better or worse, musically speaking, than electronically amplifying the current pipe organ
Probably a misreading of the situation. Ebrecht's book apparently says that it was a political dispute with the Italian state that scuppered the project. In 1875 the Pope had no temporal authority as the Vatican City state had not been established, and St Peter's was clearly in Italy (then a 14 year old state).
"Unfortunately, the pope, at that time, never responded to Cavaille-Coll's proposal."
I suppose we all know by now where MJO stands ;-) If we consider the acoustics of St Peter's, sports arenas & similar large venues to be best suited to an EWTN audience the authenticity argument would seem to be on the side of the second option. </advocatus diabolia great moral and paedagogical difference between playing an organ and amplifying it ... and playing a fake organ
the way we have been going on every account, don't you think?the only concern is volume of sound, not necessarily quality of sound.
...in 15-20 years.
In their articles and videos marketing the installation, they insinuate that Vatican officials selected it after a lengthy search process. What a joke.
To participate in the discussions on Catholic church music, sign in or register as a forum member, The forum is a project of the Church Music Association of America.