the overwhelming consensus today is that Thomas is in fact the author.
...the divergences in thought...
Interesting!
Could you elaborate for one who is not a Summa scholar?
Some have also thought that there are divergencies of thought and expression between the Summa of St. Thomas and the 'Adoro te'. The theologian who wrote 'In hoc sacramento null set deceptio' and 'In hoc sacramento veritatis sensus non decipitur circa ea quorum judicium ad ipsum pertinet' would they think scarcely have written, even in poetry, 'Visus, tactus, gustus in te fallitur'. On the other hand there is the strictest possible correspondence between the Summa and the 'Lauda Sion'.
Moreover the workmanship seems different from that of St. Thomas, and the feeling of the hymn, beautiful though it is, seems to reflect quite a different soul from that of the writer of the last verses of each of St. Thomas's compositions.
Hey there.... Beginning with v. 1.
...it doesn't sound right...
Humbly, Lord, we worship you, our Eternal King.
You who died to give us life, hear us as we sing. [Refrain]
Jesus, God and Lord of all, come to us, we pray.
Thus united in your love, may we live this day.
[Verse 2]
Jesus, Lord, we offer you ev'ry act this day.
May we live our love for you and your will obey. [Refrain]
[Verse 3]
Lord, forgive us all our faults, others we forgive.
May we strive with all our souls, Christian lives to live.[Refrain]
[Verse 4]
May we love you in each soul and each soul in you;
One in our eternal goal, one in all we do. [Refrain]
To participate in the discussions on Catholic church music, sign in or register as a forum member, The forum is a project of the Church Music Association of America.