The Ultimatum
  • SalieriSalieri
    Posts: 3,177
    When did we get the idea that mass should be celebrated to a stop watch?


    THIS.

    To answer your last question: No he hasn't. At Christmas I mentioned that I was scheduling an extra rehearsal to polish things up, and was there anything on his calendar (like extra confessions) that that could conflict with. He didn't understand why we needed rehearsal, all we had to do was show up and sing some Carols. (Sometimes I think I should get some good speakers and just play a CD of King's and then just mime it.)

    In addition, my choir is a Society, and he is ex officio the Chaplain to us. We have business meetings twice a year, he doesn't come - and I have invited him personally.
  • Dauphin35
    Posts: 31
    Frankly, your pastor sounds like a complete jerk. I would never let a priest talk down to me in that fashion without giving it right back. Some priests are never properly criticized and develop giant egos.

    I would start looking elsewhere.
  • Dauphin35
    Posts: 31
    It also sounds like he lacks respect for you as a professional. You don't come to a director of music with a list of edicts. You treat him/her like an adult, bringing problems forward and trying to find a suitable solution together. You can't have a music director if you don't respect their pastoral or professional judgement. They're not some sort of vassal.
  • melofluentmelofluent
    Posts: 4,160
    You can't have a music director if you don't respect their pastoral or professional judgement. They're not some sort of vassal.

    The last thing I would wish to offer is a contradiction to the august office of the Dauphin, but the brutish truth of our calling does, in point of fact, to accept with grace any treatment of ourselves as vassals, or as is oft-stated in various documents, handmaids or servants. We don't serve the art form itself, nor do we serve any earthly heirarch when we offer our talents in service. We serve the act of worship of Almighty God, Lord and Creator. The history of church composers, singers, musicians et al is replete with accounts of celebrity being afforded them for the genius by gentry patricians and patrons, but who also suffered much shame and derision behind the scenes, earned or otherwise. Bach is the greatest example I'm aware of. He still eeked out his living at ThomasKirche by slaving away his last years chasing delinquents with a staff and still delivering cantata after cantata.
    This gentle reminder of the built-in paradoxes between the Church and the City of God has to be in the mind of anyone who serves Christ and the faithful. And since Jackson elsewhere mentioned Robespierre, I'd bring up the fact that we, as servants are not called to make Machiavellian maneuvers to uplift our positions for our Cardinal Richlieux's, but to try to help to bring Christ's love and example to our pastors by our behaviors and discipline.
    It is not impossible to be a Christian while being maligned. In fact, it should be an honor.
    Thus endeth the pretentious lesson, amen.
  • chonakchonak
    Posts: 9,216
    Are attendance and collection figures for the various Masses tracked separately? Are numbers down at all Masses or only the stuffed Mass? If attendance at all the Masses is down, then blaming the music at the choir Mass doesn't make sense.
  • rich_enough
    Posts: 1,048
    If this were about logic and reality, you'd have a point.
    Thanked by 2Salieri Ben
  • nun_34nun_34
    Posts: 67
    You do I lift up before our Lord at this time. Your pastor as well.
    Special intercession at mass this morning: "For directors of music, their choirs, and their pastors. Let us pray to the Lord."

    A thought occurred to me; perhaps you have already pursued it: Would your pastor be open to, say once a month, a mass with the propers/chanted Gloria and not the hymns? And the other 3 Sundays, the hymn sandwich he is now requiring of you flat-out? If he's hesitant when you ask, you could try the "don't give me an answer now, but please think about it"; if he is not open to once a month, you could plead "how about once every other month?" "We could put in the bulletin which mass it would be so people would know." (You don't need the advantages of this over return-to-previous-practice spelled out, I'm sure.)

    Since you have been singing the stuffed-mass propers-plus-hymns for 5 years, it doesn't seem like your pastor is opposed to propers as such. (I could be wrong.)

    If even this much could happen, perhaps this roadblock can yet become a graced means by which you can move forward (even if it seems backward) in Singing the Mass at your parish. But whatever happens, God bless you and keep you in his care.

    Jn. 16:16-24
    Thanked by 1canadash
  • GavinGavin
    Posts: 2,799
    I have to agree with PGA here. I've been in the same situation before. At one church, I had a priest instruct me to NEVER use any hymns the congregation didn't know - at an Episcopalian church, none the less! I was fuming. Then I remembered: We have the 1982 Hymnal. I'll take 10 hymns from there over 800 from Worship IV any day.

    I can totally see how this stings like heck. Micromanagement always does. But you HAVE TO look at the positives. And you know what those are. If micromanagement gets to you THAT much, you might look for another position, but it doesn't undo the positive aspects of your situation.

    To cheer up, just count the years since the last time you played "On Eagle's Wings".
  • SalieriSalieri
    Posts: 3,177
    Are attendance and collection figures for the various Masses tracked separately? Are numbers down at all Masses or only the stuffed Mass? If attendance at all the Masses is down, then blaming the music at the choir Mass doesn't make sense.


    I think the collection figures are tracked separately, and then mashed together to get a total for the collection. As far as attendance in concerned - He's guestamating. I go to all three weekend Masses (obviously) - the 10:30 Choir Mass has the highest attendance, and the largest population of young people with large families; the 4:00 Sat. Mass (at which almost nothing is sung) has the lowest attendance, and it is mainly people in the 70's or above, a few people in their 50's; the 8:00 Sunday, which has singing, but is not as 'Big' as the 10:30 has much higher attendance than 4:00, but not quite as much as 10:30, and it's pretty even population wise for young people and old people. I haven't taken an actual headcount in a while.

    I estimate that there might be close to 200 people at the 10:30, about 150 at 8:00 and about 90 at 4:00, total attendance about 440. (This is a small country parish, surrounded by other small country parishes, one a block away.)

    All it takes is for a couple big donors to die, and a few families facing hard times, trying to put two of their 6 kids through college and put food on the table, to drop their weekly collection from $20 to $10, and you have a massive drop in the collection.
    Thanked by 1eft94530
  • SalieriSalieri
    Posts: 3,177
    As you say, Gavin, things could be worse. I am going to simply do what he tells me, and let things happen. I have the feeling that he might back-pedal, especially if the people who like the chant tell the pastor how much they dislike its absence, and I also have a feeling that the music (or lack of it) will not change the collection or attendance. I have my own feelings about the reason for the drop in attendance and collection numbers.

    He is doctrinally very conservative, (which I think is a good thing) and I think (well, I know from talking with people) that his subtle insistence on Extra ecclesiam nulla salus, and the immorality of voting for pro-abortion politicians, and sin in general, has ruffled the feathers of not a few people. Basically to them, he seems out of step with the perceived new direction that Pope Francis is taking the Church in, and so they have gone to other parishes that are more "welcoming" and "up to date" with the Pope.

    I have never in my life played OEW - at this parish, at least; subbing at other places, well, it's money.
  • francis
    Posts: 10,825
    Salieri

    I think your decision is wise. Keep mouth closed, be obedient to your superior, pray, and watch. It is best to remain neutral and let the cards fall as they may. What has happened with me is the pastor returns at some point having thought things out on his own (and/or with others) and comes to a new realization about the state of music, for better or worse.

    This could also be a time for you to become detached from yourself, your preferences, and show the pastor that what your profession requires of you, you are capable of doing, even if it goes against your better judgement and the church's preference.

    You will lose nothing in the end.
  • GavinGavin
    Posts: 2,799
    And I hope you'll understand that you still have my sincere sympathies as to your situation at present. It never feels good to be artistically stifled. I'd buy you a beer if you were in Texas.

    You can still do a lot of AWESOME work in the framework you've been given, so I'm encouraging you not to lose heart.
    Thanked by 1francis
  • chonakchonak
    Posts: 9,216
    Would it help to look for something else the choir could do, so that they may stay involved? Perhaps a monthly vespers with benediction on a Sunday or on First Friday?
    Thanked by 2Gavin JulieColl
  • francis
    Posts: 10,825
    Salieri

    You could also start (morph) a catacomb (garage) schola out of the situation.
    Thanked by 1Jeffrey Quick
  • kenstb
    Posts: 369
    Actually, while everyone has given you great suggestions, the best thing for you to do at this point is to take a step back from the situation and try to see it from an objective point of view. It may come to pass that you need not do anything but wait. As to the comments about the pastor's pro life preaching, he is required to preach in season, out of season, when convenient and when inconvenient. The gospel is supposed to make us uncomfortable sometimes. Nevertheless, I do recognize that folks generally don't like to be spoken to about the same topic over and over again. In my experience, very often the pastor is "preaching to the choir" in more ways than one on that topic.
  • SalieriSalieri
    Posts: 3,177
    So... plan of action thus far:

    Four hymn sandwich - trying to pick the hymns that are closest to fulfilling Option Four: "another liturgical chant", or Option Three: a metrical psalm. Decided to alternate the 7 ad lib. communion antiphons from SEP week by week, without the psalm. Kyrie, Gloria, Psalm, will be spoken. Sanctus & Agnus XVIII (as we have done for the past 20 years...).

    Thoughts? Do you think this is a good balance? Should I nix the communio, too?
  • PaixGioiaAmorPaixGioiaAmor
    Posts: 1,473
    Not necessarily saying you SHOULD, but if I were going to use any political capital, or pick one thing to stand firm on, it would be that the Gloria and Psalm should be SUNG. I would concede on the use of the propers and whatever else to "win" those points.
  • Matthew
    Posts: 31
    Salieri, I've been reading this thread with both sadness and disgust. I work as the DM for a Cathedral in the upper Midwest and encountered some of what you're going through early in my work. Your plan of action seems to be a nice compromise for now. Patience is difficult sometimes but can bear great fruit. I'm still dumbfounded about the lack of singing the psalm. I'm with PGA regarding the Psalm and Gloria. Best of luck to you in your continued work and hang in there!
  • SalieriSalieri
    Posts: 3,177
    I agree PGA & Matthew. I just don't want to rock the boat too much, since I was specifically told NOT to sing the Kyrie, Gloria, or Psalm.

    Music, it seems, is not so much considered the 'handmaid of the liturgy' (as Our Blessed Lady is the 'Handmaid of the Lord') as 'the Ancient Serpent'. (No pun intended regarding my forum picture!)
  • CHGiffenCHGiffen
    Posts: 5,193
    Egads!!! The Gloria is a hymn! ... it's THE HYMN of Glory to the Father on High. If it isn't sung it should only be because nobody can sing; in other words, it must be sung.
  • PaixGioiaAmorPaixGioiaAmor
    Posts: 1,473
    Well it's of course your judgment since you're IN the situation and probably know what can be discussed and what can't be.

    But you've been there a few years and likely you've been through quite a bit with this priest. Unless he's a real hot head, is he really unwilling to entertain any more discussion or compromise in this matter?

    You know better than we do.
  • SalieriSalieri
    Posts: 3,177
    CHG: My sentiments exactly.

    PGA: To be honest, I don't know. There are a few things he is totally unwilling to bend on (like Sanctus XVIII). Is this one of them? He grunts, raises eyebrows and shrugs. Would it be wise in your estimation to play ball for a month or so and NOT sing the Gloria, &c. and then ask (especially if I have pips to back me up) to reinstate it/them? I ask because I don't know. I'd especially like to know if this has happened to anyone at a particular parish.

    (Just to be clear, when I say 'hymns' I'm not talking all 8 verses of "For all the Saints", I'm talking a perfunctory verse of OLD HUNDREDTH while the ministers run down the isle at the beginning of Mass.)
  • If, in your judgment, there is a reasonable chance of your pastor compromising concerning Gloria, I would broach the matter with him very respectfully. Not singing Gloria is bizarre. Speaking it is really amusing (only Catholics would speak it with a straight face). It is a hymn. People don't speak hymns, they sing them. Speaking Gloria is as laughable as announcing on Christmas that 'we will all now stand and say "O come, all ye faithful"'.
  • SalieriSalieri
    Posts: 3,177
    Jackson, you should hear the congregation at the 4:00 Saturday Mass when this is recited:

    Priest: Glory to God in the highest.
    People: Andonearthpeacetmblmblmdlmbl. We prammblmbmlmblmbmlmbmlmblmbl. Lor'Gomblmblmblmblmblmbl....... Foryualomblmblmblmblmbl....gloriaGo'th'Fthr. Amen.

    Most edifying. Or should I say "Momblmbling"?
  • kenstb
    Posts: 369
    Salieri, I was waiting to hear how the speaking of the Gloria turned out and I'm not surprised. Congregations often descend into mumbling when they aren't led by the celebrant in the prayer. This happens a lot with the Credo as well. If you are patient, the congregation may prove your point for you. Keep your chin up. We are praying for you.
  • ClergetKubiszClergetKubisz
    Posts: 1,912
    This is going to come across as naive, I'm sure, but I have the question nonetheless: is there some fear that people are going to leave the church en masse? If not, then why the strong-arming into appealing to the PIPs all the time? Good examples of this are: "no Latin, because they can't understand it," "don't do any hymns they don't already know," "no polyphony, because they can't hear the words as well," "don't do The King of Love My Shepherd Is because the triplet is too hard for the [PIPs]," "you can't do that hymn anymore because it's 'too high,'" "people love OEW, so you should do it more," "don't do too much 'traditional' music," "no chant because people 'can't sing it,'" etc.
  • SalieriSalieri
    Posts: 3,177
    The answer to your question is this:

    We do not know the true purpose of the Sacred Liturgy; which is the Worship of GOD.

    We believe that the liturgy is about forming community, because the change of the Lex Orandi (changes sanctioned and not - including those illicitly started, condemned, and then given-in to) has caused a noticeable change in the Lex Credendi. Despite what some might argue, there is, at least in practice, if not in theory, (yes I said it that way for a reason) a "New Theology" for the Mass, which is focused on the worshiping community and it's 'feelings' and not on the One being Worshiped. Again, this New Theology of the Mass might not be the official teaching of the Church, but it has certainly been the practice of many theologians and liturgists over the past 50-odd (some very odd) years.

    If we understood the true nature of the Liturgy, and of all liturgical/ceremonial actions, we would not appeal to what the pips want, but what the Liturgical Books and Sacred Tradition Require. Until the Church can reorient herself away from appealing to 'feelings', we will continue to appeal to public opinion on matters liturgical, and, sad to say, doctrinal, and not to GOD.
  • ryandryand
    Posts: 1,640
    Salieri, here is a description of a Catholic parish's architecture that drives your point right home [emphasis mine]:

    The primary consideration was given to creating exterior spaces which would provide for outdoor gatherings while uniting the various buildings into a unifying whole.

    The Church takes shape around its congregation, arranged in a radial seating pattern to enhance the feeling of community and minimize the distance from the Sanctuary.


    It's a social club, with residual benefits of Buddy Christ showing up to party with us in the not-too-distant sanctuary.

    image

    This is all about you, folks!
    Thanked by 1expeditus1
  • ryandryand
    Posts: 1,640
    The same description includes [emphasis mine]:

    ..this worship space where we, as God's people, gather to share our love and friendship with one another and express our Faith and Praise of God.


    The priorities seem out of order here.

    POPE FRANCIS AGREES
  • SalieriSalieri
    Posts: 3,177
    The priorities seem out of order here.

    POPE FRANCIS AGREES


    Unfortunately, how many people will listen to what he says in that fervorino? Very little. Why? Because it doesn't jive with the 'Spirit of Pope Francis' as the Peace-and-Love Modernist of Time Magazine. And they will cling to their 'Spirit of Pope Francis' as the official vehicle of their 'Spirit of Vatican II', their 'Heiliger Zeitgeist'.
    Thanked by 1francis
  • ryandryand
    Posts: 1,640
    Unfortunately, how many people will listen to what he says in that fervorino?


    As many as listened to BXVI, JPII, PVI, VII...
    Thanked by 1Andrew Motyka
  • SalieriSalieri
    Posts: 3,177
    I don't really want to dig up this unpleasant thread, however, I have got to share part of an email I received from a choir-member today. I have begun a discussion about changing choir-rehearsal days because of new conflicts (work/school/etc.) in almost every member's life - as part of his response to the question, and in response to this whole "Mass needs to be as short and unadorned as possible" debacle he had this to say:

    To me, cutting all of this makes the Mass as a whole seem less Holy for some reason. Perhaps I"m using the wrong words here, but It just seems as though it's taking something from it and I think we have all felt it, so in the interest of our devotion to the Liturgy and our devotion to God, is there any way we can attempt to plead our case?
    (Emphasis added)

    So I guess, RotR, and the New Liturgical Movement is having some effect (or do I mean affect?) on people. To hear this sort of makes the past 8 years worth-while, that I somehow, despite my many faults and failings, managed to light a spark of love for the Liturgy in someone; this is quite encouraging to me.

    I must thank all of you here on the Forum and in the wider world of CMAA - I won't dare try to name you all lest I miss one.
  • JulieCollJulieColl
    Posts: 2,465
    Very encouraging words, and it shows a very real awareness that the worship of God requires us to give from our substance and must be the focal point of our week and the fons et culmen of our existence.

    I have been so inspired by the quote my husband found in one of Pope Benedict's addresses on the Holy Eucharist: Sine dominico, non possumus vivere. (Without the Sunday Mass we are not able to live.) and that is exactly the sentiment we must try to cultivate and inspire through beautiful liturgies.

    The Communion antiphon for this coming Sunday is the perfect exhortation as we all gear up for the fall:

    Honora Dominum de tua substantia, et de primitiis frugum tuarum; ut impleantur horrea tua saturitate, et vino torcularia redundabunt.

    (Honor the Lord from thy substance, and from the first of thy fruits, and thy barns shall be filled with abundance and thy presses shall run over with wine.)
    Thanked by 1Salieri
  • I'm new to the forum and, as an Episcopalian, not familiar with all of the background issues but reading this made me sad. I'm sorry this is happening to you and your choir.
  • is there any way we can attempt to plead our case?


    Answer: Like any parishioner, you can make your concerns known to the pastor. Make it clear that this is coming from you and not the music director.
    Thanked by 1Salieri
  • SalieriSalieri
    Posts: 3,177
    Sorry to dig this up again, but I wanted to share another interesting development - I didn't want to share this too soon, lest I jinx'd it ;).

    This past Sunday (XXII OT) we celebrated the 'external solemnities' for the Patronal Feast - Our Lady of Czestochowa. The pastor actually asked us (unfortunately one week ahead of time, so we really had to scramble) to do a 'high Mass' - except the Resp. Ps.

    We sang: Kyrie XI, Mozarabic Gloria (in English), Sanctus XVIII, Agnus Ad lib. II, Introit (setting ii) from Fr. Weber's new Gradual, Offertory & Communion from LCSG, mode ii melismatic Alleluia from PBC - only the intonation up to the quarter bar, the jubilus was skipped, plus hymns. We had one rehearsal to learn the propers and dust off the ordinary. The people sang very well, considering they haven't sung most of the Ordinary Time Mass ordinary (no pun intended) since February.

    Is this the beginning of the end of the end? Who knows - I have the feeling that the rest of the year we'll be doing 'low Mass' unless he requests otherwise - I suppose it's better than nothing.

    If you have been praying for us, please continue. My choir have been invoking: Our Lady (under various titles), St. Jude, St. Rita of Cascia, St. Cecilia, St. Benedict, St. Julian of Norwich, St. Gregory the Great, St. Pius X, Dom Guerranger, Dom Mocquereau, Dom Cardine, and Mary Berry (Mother Thomas More).
    Thanked by 2JulieColl CHGiffen
  • I'm so sorry you've been going through such a very difficult time, Salieri. Hopefully this is a glimmer of hope. Perhaps some people will tell the pastor how much they enjoyed/valued the sung Mass and then maybe...
    Thanked by 1Salieri
  • JulieCollJulieColl
    Posts: 2,465
    This is an amazing development, esp. on the feast day of Our Lady of Czestochowa, though I'm not really surprised since She has bailed us out of numerous scrapes and difficulties. We keep her image with us at all times. Will pray that things continue to improve.
    Thanked by 2CHGiffen Salieri
  • SalieriSalieri
    Posts: 3,177
    Benedicamus Domino, Alleluja, Alleluja! Annuntio vobis gaudium magnum!

    We had our annual Forty Hours Devotions this past weekend. We were once again asked to do a 'High Mass' - only two days ahead of time, so we had to really scramble, but we did it.

    Today I had a meeting with the pastor to discuss some things. and I brought up my concerns, and those of the choir, and we 'dialogued' (gosh, I hate that word) about the issue.

    High Mass is back, provided that I keep an eye on the time and don't "prolong things". Gloria is in, but not the Resp. Psalm. Propers are back.

    After all of this, I ran to the church and sang 'Te Deum laudamus' (tonus solemnior) I was so elated, and I know the choir will be too!

    Much thanks to all of our spiritual benefactors here and in Heaven - our prayers have been answered. Laus Deo!

    I know we're not 100% out of the woods yet, but this is very much a start. We'll take things slowly, and "proceed gradually over a reasonable length of time" to finally put everything back.
  • JulieCollJulieColl
    Posts: 2,465
    I ran to the church and sang 'Te Deum laudamus'


    Thanks for the good news and the great mental picture. This really cheered me up. : )
    Thanked by 1Salieri
  • I promise that when I'm a pastor I will never mistreat the music director.