I didn't realize that the 1974 Graduale was literally a (rearranged) photocopy of the 1908 edition. Some interesting legal/copyright justifications on page 2 of the PDF download.
Forgive the question, but I'm a newbie to EF: what is the difference between the GR and Liber Usualis? Every time I hear someone mention using the GR for something. I realize the exact same can be found in the Liber Usualis.
If you are doing the EF, this book won't do you much good anyways. This is the OF's gradual. Used like the liber, but at the OF.
If you had a 1962 graduale romanum, that would be everything you needed for Mass. Or you can just use the liber you have, it also has everything you need for Mass, and some things you don't. :)
There's also the Liber Brevior, which is in the style of the Liber Usualis (i.e., smallish scores), but omits the readings and most of the Office material, so it's more compact than the Graduale.
The brevior also only contains sunday materials, if I recall. This suits most situations. My schola uses the brevior and I'd recommend it for beginning EF scholae, assuming you normally sing in Sundays.
Thanks to J. Ostrowski for making this available. Although he has prefaced the pdf file with an explanation of its copyright status there remains much unclear. Understandably, the explanation concerns the US copyright only. What is the legal situation with using this pdf in EU remains a mystery. Leaving aside the question of typographical signs as such, we know that Solesmes (or Desclee) claims copyright of the rhythmic interpretation (placement of episemes and dots) and on 'their' melodies.
This new pdf has the original copyright notice deleted, but the in the GR of 1961 we read: "Omnia jura vindicabimus, tam in universam nostram excogitandi scribendique rhythmi rationem quam in carmina quae non inveniuntur in vaticana editione sed ex Solesmensibus libris excerpta sunt. DESCLEE & Socii." It would mean that the melodies and placement of rhythmic signs of the neo-gregorian pieces which have not been printed any Vatican edition could be still under copyright.
In EU, the copyright expires after 70 years. It would mean that all the new pieces composed after 1944, e.g., introit Signum magnum (Assumption), are still copyrighted.
It is even a bigger problem for the traditional Mass than for the Novus ordo, since it contains more texts for which neo-gregorian chants were composed in the 40s and 50s. Any thoughts?
To participate in the discussions on Catholic church music, sign in or register as a forum member, The forum is a project of the Church Music Association of America.