Catholic Hymnody, Authority, and Modern Hymnals
  • Don9of11Don9of11
    Posts: 819
    Why are Catholic hymnals no longer approved by bishops, and how is Catholic hymnody evaluated today? In this article, I examine the historical role of episcopal approval, the gradual disappearance of imprimaturs after the Second Vatican Council, and how responsibility for hymn selection now functions within the Church.

    Drawing on Catholic Hymnody at the Service of the Church (USCCB, 2020), the Church’s liturgical and doctrinal documents, and What Is a Catholic Hymn?, this study seeks not to be polemical, but ecclesial: to clarify what the Church means by Catholic hymnody and how modern hymnals measure up to those standards.

    Please visit Mother of Mercy Catholic Hymns and read Catholic Hymnody, Authority, and Modern Hymnals

    I’m grateful for any thoughtful engagement, correction, or clarification from those more learned in these matters.
  • WillWilkin
    Posts: 39
    Our parish uses Word and Song, from World Library Publications, a division of GIA Publications. It is not just a hymnal but also has the readings and a responsorial psalm for every Sunday and Feast Day mass, etc. The copyright page says the liturgical texts are published with the approval of the Committee on Divine Worship of the USCCB. Funeral music at least is sourced from an ICEL source. Overall it seems pretty legit Roman Catholic although the hymns themselves are only noted by copyright holders not church approval. I wonder if the article linked above might be improved by assessing more of the hymnals out there, since only 4 or 5 are mentioned, Word and Song not being one of them.
  • a_f_hawkins
    Posts: 3,670
    The document What is a Catholic Hymn? is written as though only the Mass is relevant. No hymn written before 1963 was intended for use at Mass, most were for devotions, school assemblies, etc., perhaps for the Office. And indeed hymns are now generally not needed for Mass, but are for the Liturgy of the Hours.
  • francis
    Posts: 11,311
    The TLM has adopted an unusual practice of putting a vernacular hymn at the beginning and end of the liturgy. I’m not crazy about it, although it seems to work OK. I think an organ prelude and postlude is more fitting.
    Thanked by 1sdtalley3
  • Felicia
    Posts: 158
    Various types of religious songs (carols, noels, cantigas, laude, Leisen, etc.) have existed in the Catholic sphere since the Middle Ages, but, as noted above, they were mostly sung outside of Mass. In the 19th century the Caecilian movement in German-speaking lands promoted the Singmesse or Betsingmesse, in which the faithful sang hymns in the vernacular that paraphrased what was happening at the altar. J.B. Singenberger and his son Otto were two (among many others) who brought the Singmesse and German hymns to the United States, for example: "Grosser Gott" (Holy God, we praise Thy name), "Gott Vater, sei gepriesen" (God Father, praise and glory) or "Freu dich, du Himmelskönigin" (Be joyful, Mary, heavenly Queen). I must admit ignorance as to whether hymns like these were actually sung at Mass (as opposed to other events) before the mid-20th century; others may know more. Fr. Anthony Ruff has written on this topic.

    Pope PIus XII mentioned the singing of popular hymns in the vernacular "wherever ancient or immemorial custom permits" in his 1958 Instruction, De musica sacra et sacra liturgia, article 14 a & b. However, he specified that this may be done after the sacred words have been sung in Latin (italics mine). Also, the places where this was an ancient or immemorial custom was probably not the average parish in the United States at that time.
    Thanked by 2CHGiffen Don9of11
  • Don9of11Don9of11
    Posts: 819
    It may help if I briefly clarify where I’m coming from. My reflections are rooted in the Ordinary Form of the Mass, simply because that is the parish world that formed me. I began first grade in 1966, and hymnody in the Ordinary Form shaped my prayer and understanding of the faith from the beginning.

    For that reason, I’m not really comparing musical practices across forms. My concern is the lived experience of ordinary parishes, where hymns quietly form belief week after week.

    I’m grateful for the seriousness and good will people have brought to this discussion. Resources such as Word and Song, like Breaking Bread, reflect current practice: bishops regulate the official liturgical texts they contain, while the hymns themselves are not subject to the same formal approval process.

    The documents I’ve shared (What Is a Catholic Hymn?, Catholic Hymnody, Authority, and Modern Hymnals, and A Pastoral Look at the Hymns We Sing) were written from that parish perspective, with the hope of encouraging a shared understanding of what makes hymnody authentically Catholic within the Ordinary Form.
  • TLMlover
    Posts: 122
    "My concern is the lived experience of ordinary parishes, where hymns quietly form belief week after week."

    I started to write a very long reply about my coming into the Church 26 years ago and what I have experienced since then as a musician in both English and Spanish-speaking parishes. But my story was way too long and I realized that it could be summarized in a few thoughts:

    a) YES, the music totally affected me, right from the beginning, as a new Catholic.

    b) NO, it did not "quietly form (my) belief" because I was influenced also very much by Mother Angelica, who was very traditional; and also by my general affinity for tradition and order.

    c) In the midst of it all, God calls us to a deeper understanding, so eventually some of us wake up and know something isn't right at Novus Ordo Masses with modern music.

    d) I discovered the Latin Mass 19 years after I came into the Church, and it changed everything for me.

    e) My mission since 2019 is to try to "fix" the music in whichever Novus Ordo parish I am serving, and to try to (gently) educate other musicians/parishioners about the rubrics which govern the Mass, while continuing to study on my own.

    f) A portion of Novus Ordo parishioners really long for traditional Mass and traditional music. A portion of them detest anything traditional. Some say they HATE Latin.

    g) For people who are not seeking to deepen their faith, the modern music IS the Mass.

    h) They did a great job in the 70s and 80s of ruining the Mass by simply changing the music. Everything else fell into place after that.
  • Felicia
    Posts: 158
    @Don9of11, Thank you for providing your perspective, and for the work you're doing.

    My intention was to illustrate that vernacular songs existed before Vatican II at various times and places. Of course, you, and most of the members of this forum, are aware of this, but there is still this persistent idea out there that hymns in the vernacular began with the Council. I mentioned the German tradition in particular because of its influence on American Catholic hymnody generally. J. Vincent Higginson wrote about this in his books.

    In short, I wasn't focusing on any particular parish.

    I started first grade in 1962, so I'm a few years older than yourself. My education was in public schools and public universities. My father was an active duty NCO in the Air Force, so I grew up as an "Air Force brat" living in several different places as a youngster, including overseas in Japan from 1963-65 (while VII was taking place). Thus, my childhood experiences of church were in base chapels, where priests also moved around a lot, since they, too, were active duty. I remember the "four-hymn sandwich" being common, but I'm unaware of hymn-singing before Mass in any of those places, such as you describe taking place in your parish. That custom may have existed in some places, but I don't think it was widespread.

    As a side note, it is interesting that relatively little of other ethnic traditions appears in our hymnody. Vatican II occurred just as the descendants of the big European immigration wave of 1870-1920 had become assimilated.
    Thanked by 2Don9of11 CHGiffen
  • oldhymnsoldhymns
    Posts: 269
    Hymns in the English language were certainly used and sung at the low Mass prior to 1965 or so. I started first grade in Catholic parochial school in 1955 and graduated from the eight grade of the same school in 1963. Starting in fourth grade, the students from the school would sing English hymns at Sunday Mass. The congregation could join in, of course. For the most part, these hymns came from St. Basil's Hymnal, Sunday School Hymn Book, and Our Lady of Mercy Hymnal. We had so-called hymn cards (as many parishes did) comprised of 15 or so "favorite" hymns. Needless to say, we also sang hymns of this genre in school (morning and afternoon) and at various para-liturgical services. Seasonal hymns were important; for example, for the Feast of Christ the King, we would always sing "An Army of Youth" (for Christ the King by Daniel Lord, S.J.) Many of these fine hymns of the faith can be found in A CATHOLIC BOOK OF HYMNS, 2021, Sacred Music Library.

    THE HOLY CROSS HYMNAL (with Words and Music by Cardinal O'Connell) was first published in 1915 and continued to be marketed by McLaughlin & Reilly Co., of Boston up until the time of Vatican II. On the opening page is a recommendation by Cardinal O'Connell: "A good method of using these Hymns for devotion at Mass is the following:
    Before Mass--Hymn to the Holy Trinity or Holy Spirit
    Beginning of Mass--Hymn of Holy Mass
    After Consecration--The Blessed Sacrament (a favorite of mine)
    At Communion--Holy Communion
    At the Blessing--Hymn for the Blessing
    Between the beginning of Mass and the consecration may be sung a Hymn: to the Blessed Virgin Mary, St. Joseph, Sacred Heart, or Guardian Angel, or any other hymn appropriate to the day."

    So, as you can see, English hymns at Mass were not really a post-Vatican invention, although since 1970 or so the four-hymn sandwich predominates in most parishes. Occasionally, I like to attend a Sunday Mass without any music; but they are hard to find.
  • Hymns in the English language were certainly used and sung at the low Mass prior to 1965 or so.

    The Ave Maria Hymnal has recomendations similar to those by Cardinal O'Connell. My copy is in deep storage.
    The German American community was prolific in producing translations of their favorite hymns, which most certainly were sung at Low Mass. Fr. Rothensteiner in his Garland of Praise provides two sets of hymns for Low Mass.
    Thanked by 1Don9of11
  • oldhymnsoldhymns
    Posts: 269
    Thanks, Roborgelmeister, for mentioning the Ave Maria Hymnal by Rev. Joseph Pierron, who was director of music at Boys Town, Nebraska, and was also editor of CAECILIA in 1930. I checked my two editions (1929 and 1941), and I see that Father Pierron, like Cardinal O'Connell, recommends certain English hymns for use at Communion, after Communion, and so forth. This is an outstanding hymnal.
  • Don9of11Don9of11
    Posts: 819
    Just to clarify my intent: my aim wasn’t to prescribe a single normative practice, but to clarify a broader historical and pastoral reality. Before Vatican II, Low Mass was far more common—on Sundays as well as weekdays—than many people today realize, and it was in that setting that vernacular hymns were widely sung as devotional prayer alongside the Latin liturgy. That history helps explain both why hymn‑singing was familiar long before the Council and why it continues to feel natural in parish life today.

    I’m currently developing two related studies, Catholic Hymnody and the Pre‑Conciliar Mass and Why Catholics Sang Hymns Before Vatican II, which explore this history in more detail.
    Thanked by 2oldhymns hilluminar
  • ronkrisman
    Posts: 1,410
    Resources such as Word and Song, like Breaking Bread, reflect current practice: bishops regulate the official liturgical texts they contain, while the hymns themselves are not subject to the same formal approval process.

    I don't know what goes on in the Archdiocese of Portland, where OCP is located, or in other (arch)dioceses in which a hymnal is, on occasion, published, but the Archdiocese of Chicago is quite diligent in its review of hymnals prior to its granting a permission to publish. During the years I served as GIA's editor for bilingual resources (2006-2013), the hymnody sections of Gather (3rd edition), Worship (4th edition), and Oramos Cantando/We Pray in Song were sent to the Archdiocese for its doctrinal review.
  • Don9of11Don9of11
    Posts: 819
    Thank you for raising this clarification; it is helpful and sharpens the discussion. Hymns used in Catholic worship should indeed be distinctly Catholic in theology, ecclesial voice, and liturgical function, since they participate in the Church’s public prayer and help form belief (lex orandi, lex credendi).

    When I examine my copy of the Gather Hymnal 3rd edition I find the following "In accordance with canon 827, permission to publish is granted by the Archdiocese of Chicago.”

    At the same time, that expectation is not what canon 827 is designed to guarantee. Canon 827 provides only for a limited judgment that texts are free from explicit doctrinal or moral error; it neither requires nor implies a positive evaluation of hymns as fully expressive of Catholic sacramental theology, ecclesiology, or liturgical identity.

    This distinction helps explain why hymnals permitted for publication can still contain texts from other Christian traditions that are broadly orthodox but not distinctly Catholic. It is precisely this gap—between minimal orthodoxy and authentic Catholic liturgical expression—that the bishops themselves identify as a serious pastoral concern in Catholic Hymnody at the Service of the Church (USCCB, 2020), and why they call the Church to exercise far greater theological and liturgical care in what it sings at Mass.

    Permission to publish answers the question of orthodoxy; the bishops’ later teaching rightly asks the deeper question of whether our sung prayer is authentically Catholic.
  • WillWilkin
    Posts: 39
    There is an aspect to ecclesiastical hierarchical hymn approval that reminds me that Jesus often criticized the legalism of the pharisees and priests as devoid of the love and mercy and charity he taught, and which was scandalized by the company he kept. I also notice the devotion and Christian service to all in people who don't discriminate between hymns too stringently, such as my saintly mother who had a few Joe Wise albums when I was a kid.

    And so paging through the GIA Word and Song, I accept the Amazing Grace and Eagles Wings and various African American hymns and other idiosyncratic or highly subjective hymns such as Lord of the Dance or Jesus In The Morning or How Can I Keep From Singing or Soon And Very Soon or, the especially subjective O God You Search Me. A lot of the hymns I find in Word and Song seem like children's songs or are very subjective, hardly scriptural or doctrinal.

    But I read this forum because my own tastes run very conservative in music. I adore the plainchant and all attempts to make the liturgies beautiful and extraordinary. But this still doesn't make me anywhere near as good a Christian as my mother. I love the rituals and traditions and old music, but I have come to see all that as my own subjectivity and taste. The problem with conservatism is in identifying that perfect golden moment in time, before which everything was still in formation and after which has all been corruption and decline. Real life is always in motion and in the new present.

    Once when I knocked on a rectory door to ask the priest to let my work crew into the school so we could get on the roof, he invited me to first drink coffe and in our conversation I asked him about the Angelus bells we heard each noon and if they did any sung masses at the parish. He interpreted my questions to require answering by lamenting division in the church and asking if I was from the right wing of the church. I hadn't expected the question and was pleasantly surprised to hear my answer come out right even before I knew what to say: "All wings, Father."
  • Felicia
    Posts: 158
    Part of the reason hymns of Protestant origin were brought into Catholic hymnals after the Second World War was the perception among some musicians and liturgists that many of the pre-conciliar Catholic hymns were short on scriptural emphasis, and were overly sentimental, both textually and musically. Paul Hume, who was a convert, was particularly critical of the music (his book, Catholic Church Music, was published by Dodd, Mead & Co., 1956).
  • Felicia
    Posts: 158
    It's also worth noting that the New Saint Basil's Hymnal of 1958 has much different content from older editions of the Saint Basil's.
    Thanked by 1CHGiffen
  • Don9of11Don9of11
    Posts: 819
    I have not read Paul Hume’s book, so I can’t comment on its specific claims, or on the assertion that part of the reason hymns of Protestant origin were brought into Catholic hymnals after the Second World War was a perception among some musicians and liturgists that pre‑conciliar Catholic hymns were short on scriptural emphasis.

    What I can comment on is the historical record, which shows that questions about hymn texts and their pastoral use were not entirely absent from Catholic life. Efforts such as The Catholic Chapel Hymnal, the Catholic radio broadcast experiment, and the Extension Magazine hymn contests indicate what Catholics themselves were asking for at the time. In various ways, some Catholic musicians and institutions were exploring how hymnody might better serve catechesis and congregational devotion. Many Eucharistic, Marian, and Sacred Heart hymns were therefore written deliberately to pass on the faith—often the Catechism itself—through poetic imagery and scriptural allusion rather than direct quotation. Seen this way, Catholic hymnody came to be evaluated in later contexts by criteria that did not arise from its own liturgical, devotional, or catechetical tradition, but from external models of hymnody that assumed fundamentally different purposes for congregational song.
    Thanked by 2Felicia oldhymns
  • PaxMelodious
    Posts: 483
    The suggestion that hymns used in Catholic worship should be distinctly Catholic seems, ahh, extreme.

    It's saying that a hymn suitable for Catholic worship can ONLY be used in Catholic worship, and should have features which make it unsuitable for use by any other Christian denomination - including Anglicans!

    That's rather a lot to ask of 16 lines of poetry!

    (assuming 4 x 4-line verses)
    Thanked by 1Roborgelmeister
  • Felicia
    Posts: 158
    @Don9of11, We're in agreement that hymn texts and their pastoral use were not entirely absent from Catholic life.

    My comment is based on research I had done years ago on post-conciliar hymnals and my reading of books and articles by various authors from around the time of the Council. This was the sense I got from some (not all) of those authors. I compiled a bibliography of Catholic hymnals published in the U.S. between 1962 and 1997 which was published in The Hymn in 1998. I also wrote an essay and compiled two appendices on Protestant hymnody in Roman Catholic Worship that was published in Wonderful Words of Life, published by Eerdmans in 2004.

    Granted, that latter publication was geared more towards non-Catholics than to Catholics. The way it came about: In the late 1990's I was looking for opportunities to publish, and I saw a call for papers for a Hymnody in American Protestantism project. It occurred to me that the topic of Catholic use of Protestant hymns might be relevant, so I submitted a proposal, and (to my surprise, really) it was accepted.

    I hope this helps.
    Thanked by 2Don9of11 CHGiffen
  • Don9of11Don9of11
    Posts: 819
    @PaxMelodius, I think we may be talking past one another here because I am speaking specifically about the Catholic Mass, not Christian worship in general. The Mass is the Church’s own liturgy, governed by Catholic theology, sacramental belief, and ecclesial discipline. In that context, it is neither extreme nor exclusionary to say that hymns used at Mass should be distinctly Catholic.

    This does not mean that Catholic hymnody must be usable only by Catholics, or that it should be rendered unsuitable for Anglicans or other Christians. On the contrary, if others wish to sing Catholic hymnody, they are entirely welcome to do so. The point is simply that what the Church sings within the Mass should be capable of expressing Catholic faith clearly and coherently.

    Sixteen lines of poetry are hardly insignificant when they function as a liturgical text. Even brief hymns shape belief, presume a theology, and either support or obscure the sacramental action taking place. Asking that such texts be theologically and liturgically Catholic is not an extreme demand, but a reasonable expectation of the Church’s own worship.

    Thank you for the thoughtful engagement. My intention has simply been to clarify how the Church understands her own liturgy—specifically the Mass—and the role hymnody plays within it. The concerns I’ve raised are the same ones articulated by the bishops in Catholic Hymnody at the Service of the Church (USCCB, 2020), and I’m content to let that teaching frame the discussion.