After sticking to more than a decade using software instruments, it's time to use a pen, paper, and a piano. I tried composing a piece using text from the Diary of St. Faustina, but it's evident my craft is overreliant on software instruments (Vienna Symphonic Library, to be exact). For those who stick to a pen, paper, and piano, what exercises do you do to hone your craftsmanship? I'm sure 4-part writing is one as well as species counterpoint, but anything unique? Species counterpoint and 4-part writing are great, but they are taught EVERYWHERE (Yes, because they help), and I'd like some unique takes on personal routines y'all use to exercise the ear and brain. Creative responses preferred!
I listen to 1000s of hours of Bach over and over and over and as the music goes by I analyze the harmonic structure - of course, you gotta know your intervals really well to see the music this way, but you cannot do this enough.
Then write a lot of canons and fugues and trio comps in imitation of the same. Then bring in the ninths, elevenths and thirteenths to bring it up to date.
How are your audiation skills? Write what you're hearing. Yes, you aren't going to get it all. At first you might just get a lead line, and have to discover the harmony after the fact. All good. If you have rhythms but are unsure of harmony, note the rhythms with cluster heads denoting register, then work out the harmony later. Harmony is your chief delineator of larger rhythm, so be aware of the nuances between subtle harmonic change (Cmaj to E min) and extreme (Cmaj to Ab min).
Right now I'm working through a workbook called "Harmony, Counterpoint, Partimento" by Job IJzerman. Returning to the basics has been helpful for me in terms of slowing down, working through harmonic solutions, and refreshing my toolkit. Scholastic counterpoint and fugue, in my opinion, are both still helpful and relevant, if for no other reason than for helping you build and expand ideas, even if you're using a more modern harmonic vocabulary of ninths, elevenths, clusters, etc.
I also find it essential, after personal trial and error, to not use software when you start a piece. Use pen, paper, your ears, and a keyboard. Save the software for final engraving. Things that sound "bad" in software, I found, sound better when at a real instrument...and vice-versa.
Lastly, collect the scores of composers whose music speaks most to you. Study their harmonic language, their tricks, their inspirations. It will help you craft your own voice as time goes on.
I mainly use paper and pencil to write down my initial ideas. For myself it looks like writing the 4 part harmonies, short polyphonic phrases here and there. Then once I get the gist of the structure, I go over to the software and make final edits there. Paper and pen forced you to write truly what’s on your mind and the “real” ideas in head. Software and playback capabilities can tend to fantasize what you want to compose. Pen and paper is like farm to table ;) and I’m in total agreement with the others, studying Bach and musical scores not to steal there music but to learn how they were effective.
I can definitely benefit from score study. That’s a staple tool I often ignored. Pieces like Stravinsky’s Pétrouchka or Howells’ Hymnus Paradisi are extremely inspiring. Anything Stravinsky writes is awesome. Ravel is quite good as well. 20th century British composers, specifically the first half, were all really good (Walton, Howells, Britten, Holst, Vaughan Williams, etc.).
I find the videos on the YT channel Early Music Sources both entertaining and instructive for composers interested in the styles of earlier periods. Now and then I could get some inspiration therefrom.
I agree about pencil and paper — you have to choose each note purposefully. With software it's too easy to copy-n-paste, or play in stuff with MIDI, so you don't have to think through what you're creating. You can just mess around and see what happens. Good compositions have to be tightly controlled — a purposeful use of a harmonic palette, repetition and development of melodic ideas, formal structure, etc. I use software only for engraving, and wrestle with the act of composition at a desk or a piano.
The other thing I think is absolutely necessary is the regularity of composing often. I've gone through phases where I was cranking out new pieces every week, for periods of 3-4 years at a time, and I usually feel like it takes a few months to shake off all the rust and finally get into the groove (the mojo, if you will) of composing — but then things start to happen. I've always admired the Brazilian composer Hermeto Pascoal, who wrote a tune a day, and would then publish a year's worth of compositions in a big book. Concert band composer W. Francis McBeth said once at a clinic that he squirrels himself away every day from 7-11am and composes; a student asked, "What if musical ideas come to you at other times of day?" and he answered, "that never happens, because my mind is so used to a certain routine for musical creativity." Admirable discipline, that.
You may fear that if you're writing all the time, you'll end up repeating yourself, and while there's some risk of that, I have found that writing regularly at close intervals does the opposite: as I see the musical devices that I tend to gravitate toward, I also begin to tweak and develop them, so that six months down the road my palette has subtly but noticeably expanded.
Something I remember from Schumann's diaries is that one can "mess around and see what happens" with paper too: he thought anything not worked out in memory might not be fully baked. One of Ernst Bloch's morning routines was to hike down the beach and write out a Bach fugue before turning back; if his memory got stuck it became a composition problem.
To participate in the discussions on Catholic church music, sign in or register as a forum member, The forum is a project of the Church Music Association of America.