Subpunctis Neumes
-
This doesn't make sense. Are the graphics and their labels mixed up? Are the images actually a scandicus subbipunctis and a podatus subtripunctis?
Source: Joseph Robert Carroll: An Applied Course in Gregorian Chant. Toledo: GIA, 1956. Thanked by 1CHGiffen -
Yes, the first is of a scandicus (neum of 3 notes ascending) with descending notes and the second is of a podatus (neum of 2 notes ascending) with descending notes. You are absolutely correct.
Welcome to the MusicaSacra Forum!
To participate in the discussions on Catholic church music, sign in or register as a forum member, The forum is a project of the Church Music Association of America.
Categories
- All Discussions21,054
- General Music Discussion8,194
- Job Openings190
- Management of Music Programs850
- Choral Matters532
- Church Documents and Rubrics524
- CMAA Notes300
- Events713
- For Newcomers: Read First26
- Sacred Polyphony546
- Hymnody871
- Gregorian Chant: General2,694
- ↳ Graduale Romanum and Liber Usualis367
- ↳ Graduale Simplex60
- ↳ Semiology63
- Vernacular Plainsong695
- Anglican Use and Anglican Chant68
- Organ, Other Instruments and Repertoire433
- New Composition/Works in Progress1,286
- Recordings229
- Music for Hispanic Ministry159
- Music Education: Children211
- Music Education: General222
- News Items245
- Positions Wanted2
- General Discussion: Catholicism738
- Amusements176
- General Discussion1,033
- Opinions117