Subpunctis Neumes
-
This doesn't make sense. Are the graphics and their labels mixed up? Are the images actually a scandicus subbipunctis and a podatus subtripunctis?
Source: Joseph Robert Carroll: An Applied Course in Gregorian Chant. Toledo: GIA, 1956. Thanked by 1CHGiffen -
Yes, the first is of a scandicus (neum of 3 notes ascending) with descending notes and the second is of a podatus (neum of 2 notes ascending) with descending notes. You are absolutely correct.
Welcome to the MusicaSacra Forum!
To participate in the discussions on Catholic church music, sign in or register as a forum member, The forum is a project of the Church Music Association of America.
Categories
- All Discussions21,102
- General Music Discussion7,591
- Job Openings1,302
- Management of Music Programs833
- Choral Matters519
- Church Documents and Rubrics504
- CMAA Notes291
- Events651
- For Newcomers: Read First23
- Sacred Polyphony528
- Hymnody821
- Gregorian Chant: General2,582
- ↳ Graduale Romanum and Liber Usualis354
- ↳ Graduale Simplex55
- ↳ Semiology57
- Vernacular Plainsong671
- Anglican Use and Anglican Chant66
- Organ, Other Instruments and Repertoire414
- New Composition/Works in Progress1,208
- Recordings222
- Music for Hispanic Ministry151
- Music Education: Children205
- Music Education: General214
- News Items242
- Positions Wanted58
- General Discussion: Catholicism723
- Amusements170
- General Discussion1,000
- Opinions113