The "How-tos" of a Renewed Choir
  • Even though I was fired as choir director after only two months, I learned much about renewing a choir in the model that Musicam Sacram (1967) envisioned and the Holy Spirit seems to be blessing in the last couple of years. I think what I have learned may be helpful to others who are blessed with a pastor who wants to implement the best practices we in CMAA have been learning about.

    First, I volunteered to serve as director for a number of months without pay. This enabled us to hire a qualified organist to play our really fine pipeorgan. The idea behind this was to use the choral Mass as an evangelization tool, bringing into the Church people who had been put off by what one choir member called "wiggle-waggle music," and unchurched folks who would be attracted by the beauty of what we were doing.

    Second, we agreed up front that we would continue to use the existing pianist (who had been the only accompanist for several years), and incorporate music from all of the Catholic tradition, both ancient and modern. The pastor later changed his mind about this, and that's when I was discharged, but we very successfully integrated Haugen hymns with traditional ones in the congregational singing. The pipeorgan, with supplementing piano, vastly improved the leadership of the hymns, and the congregation was responding enthusiastically, especially to the foursquare Introit hymn and concluding hymn of thanksgiving.

    Third, we did not waste a lot of time learning a new Ordinary. We had been using the "award winning" Mass of Renewal at all English Masses for a full year. I've reviewed that on the ChantForever website. We switched the Gloria, Sanctus and Agnus Dei to the Missal chant. It took about fifteen minutes for the choir to learn them, and the congregation was singing them within a couple of weeks.

    Fourth, we spent adequate time learning the propers for each Sunday, using Adam Bartlett's English Propers. We sang the Introit (men chanting with women on handbells) and Communion (female voices only with psalmist verses and piano accompaniment). The Introit was sung once before the Introit hymn, which was chosen to complement the Introit. The Communion antiphon was sung three or four times, with psalmist verses between, while the priest, deacon and communion ministers received. Then the choir received communion while the organist played an improvization on the Communion antiphon melody. Finally, after the choir and pianist had received Holy Communion, all sang a suitable (usually modern) Communion hymn. The improvement in continuity was so strong that I suggested it for other choirs.

    Fifth, we realized that it was critical to recruit new members who wanted to achieve more diversity in the music. We posted recruitment signs weekly and began the process a month before the choir "debut." I preached a homily at three Masses encouraging the parish to get behind the new effort. We used the tag line "pray, give, join." Our numbers immediately shrank (a little) as folks who wanted to sing only lite rock bailed. But within a month we were back at strength and actually had enough men to rehearse three and four-part anthems.

    All trajectories were positive. In our case, the ultimate result was what might be considered a failure, but only because of outside factors. When the pastor changes his mind, one has to obey. But I would recommend this method, and the focus on the beauty of the propers of the Mass, for anyone who wants to follow the Council's and the Holy Father's (and the U.S. bishops') lead in renewing the music of the Mass.
  • Second, we agreed up front that we would continue to use the existing pianist (who had been the only accompanist for several years), and incorporate music from all of the Catholic tradition, both ancient and modern. The pastor later changed his mind about this, and that's when I was discharged...


    Basically, you did exactly what it usually takes 4 years to get fired for. I can see where this might be less painful than the 4 year approach!


    Possibly you could elaborate on this, that you were discharged and they went back to singing Haugen. The fact that you were a deacon and experienced this may give us all some insight into our own situations, both current and past.

    Thank you for being willing to post about what was undoubtedly an unfortunate and stressful situation.
  • BenBen
    Posts: 3,114
    Yes, thank you for doing what you did. You never know who you might have touched and launched into a love of sacred music.

    I myself probably would have never considered learning (and certainly not loving) chant had I not been exposed to jubilate deo (the latin original version of the missal chants) and gregorian propers on a weekly, consistent basis. I wouldn't consider it a failure at all.

    You may never know the fruits your effort may bear down the road.
  • I know that I touched the members of our choir. Their comments on my termination were heartfelt and heart-wrenching. The best part was the congregation's response during our time of service. They told us that we had brought beauty back to the Mass. Exactly the point. The world won't listen to truth or appreciate goodness, but they will respond to beauty--that will lure them back to Christ.
  • So sorry that you were discharged. It's incredibly difficult and sometimes outright impossible to try and please everybody. I am in that boat right now. I became DM 3 months before a major transition with the pastor and principal of the school. We went from P&W music and a very charismatic approach to liturgy to organ hymns and propers. It was not pretty. I lost my entire ministry and had to start all over again and even now, after 18 months, face incredible odds every time I sit on the bench. I have the same vision as the new pastor......Catholic music away from OCP and 1970's "feel good..all about me" music. It's a battle we all have to face if we want to do what we feel is correct. The sad part is that, in trying to get the choir to understand the Vatican's views on sacred music, the rebuttal is always that the Catholic church down the street continues to play Haugen.

    Those of us in music leadership positions must stand firm with the guidance of the Holy Spirit. Again, I'm sorry for your discharge, but somewhere down the line you will find out you've affected more people than you know. God bless always. Blessed Advent.
  • GavinGavin
    Posts: 2,799
    "The rebuttal is always that the Catholic church down the street continues to play Haugen."

    That's always the rebuttal, isn't it?
  • TCJ
    Posts: 986
    "The rebuttal is always that the Catholic church down the street continues to play Haugen."


    That's always the rebuttal, isn't it?


    It certainly is where I am, except it was worded in a slightly different manner. "The majority of Catholic churches play [insert trendy song here]. Are you telling me they're wrong?"

    "Yes."

    That never convinces anyone, but it's fun to say.
    Thanked by 3Ally ryand Jenny
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,978
    I use the old parent/English teacher reply. "If what's-his-name jumped off a cliff, would you jump, too." If they say yes, I reply, "have a nice trip down." Another reply I have found useful is along the lines of, 4 other churches in town do what you are asking. Most of the people are here because they don't want that. Perhaps you would be happier at St. Flit-a-bout's by the Levee.