even if the idea is not to market the text but merely to provide a helpful translation that is actually used every Sunday, and most people have committed to memory,
In a comment thread on a previous post, someone mentioned that the Book of Common Prayer, even the most recent edition, is in public domain to encourage the widest possible use, at no charge. That makes sense. We are, after all, talking about a religious text the words of which are the common property of the whole world. If someone wants to claim ownership over a particular edition with new material, that's another matter, of course.
Living in the Catholic world in which tribute, a liturgy tax, must be paid to International Commission on English in the Liturgy (ICEL) for printing the text of the Mass, even for simple musical settings for distribution outside a single event (and I'm going to stop laying out all the technicalities here, else I would have to reprint ICEL's own textual minefield in full), this news about the BCP is rather interesting.
Sure enough, the commentator is right: here, here, here, here, and probably a thousand other places. Many people are able to sell it in different formats, and even profitably. No disaster has befallen the liturgy as a result. Compare those links to this one.
In the same way, of course, the text of the 1962 Missal is free for all, as are most supporting materials.
That leaves the ordinary form of the Roman Rite as the exception, and it is a very serious one, given that new texts are are going to be issued that will require musical settings. Catholics will not be free to compose music and post it for free download or for sale without first and last paying ICEL. That gives a huge market boost to the established music publishers that are currently the big players in the market. What we have here is a monopolistic barrier to entry to the market that affects every parish and every Catholic.
Why the ICEL tax? They say they need the money, more than the rest of us I suppose. But if a Church can't pay for the production of its own liturgical texts, I'm not sure what there is to say about that.
Something needs to change, dramatically and quickly, about ICEL's copyright and royalty policies.
The letter from Cardinal Arinze posted here presents the framework for the new Mass texts. It specifies that the purpose is, in part, to "facilitate the devising of musical settings for the parts of the Mass." It further specifies that the text is under copyright and so it is subject to "all pertinent copyright legislation in civil law" in accordance with the statutes of ICEL.
Many composers might at first feel a sense of excitement here that the Church is asking for their creative contributions. But then they look at the ICEL rules that Cardinal Arinze rightly says are enforced by the state. It turns out that ICEL demands a tax--this is the right world since the payments rely on coercion--be paid for any settings that are posted for more than one-time use. The taxes go higher if the music finds a market.
There are only a few publishers prepared to pay this tax, understand the accounting rules, and can bear the costs associated with compliance. We need to appreciate just how afraid of these rules that most musicians really are. They will compose and let these pieces sit on their harddrives rather than post them. That leaves only the established music publishers in a position to distribute appropriate musical settings.
So we see here that Cardinal Arinze's two principles are at odds with each other: it is not possible to facilitate widespread and faithful musical settings of these texts under ICEL's current copyright/"royality" rules. There is a simple workaround: make these texts open source. They can use Creative Commons or even conventional copyright while eliminating the tax on publishing with broad permissions granted de facto. This is how the ordo of service for every other denomination handles matters, so far as I know. Changes are essential if the monopolistic forces currently impeding progress are not addressed. The status quo is not suitable.
Right now, ICEL's rules say nothing about digital publication or online distribution, almost as if they are made to apply to a world that disappeared ten years ago. There is an opportunity right now for ICEL to issue a clarification. If that clarification does not assist in permitting widespread creation and distribution of new musical settings, there is a case for some sort of intervention.
Good idea! Perhaps every other word could be printed underneath . . .
Dear Mr. Tucker:
Your letter of 5 August requesting permission to post musical settings of the newly-released texts of the Order of Mass online for free download was passed on to me by my assistant Jason McFarland.
As you know, the International Commission on English in the Liturgy was established by the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments as a Mixed Commission in service to the Conferences of Bishops that use English in the celebration of the Liturgy. As a result, permissions granted by ICEL for use of its texts are contingent on the authorization of the publication in question by the Conference(s) of Bishops in those territories where the publication is to be distributed. Various Conferences have been discussing the important issue of the timeline for catechesis on the implementation of the new Missal translation and the production of materials to aid in the reception of the new translation. It is our understanding that an implementation date for the publication of the Order of Mass texts will need to wait until the translation of the entire Missal has been approved by the Conferences of Bishops and the approval has received the recognitio of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments. The schedule for release of musical settings of the Order of Mass, therefore, will be established by each Conference of Bishops. It is possible, however, that some Conferences will decide to allow for publication and release of musical settings of the Order of Mass before the entire Missal has been approved. Should you wish, therefore, to proceed with your plans to make available online settings of the new translation of the Order of Mass, you first need to contact the national liturgy offices of those Conferences where you plan to make these settings available. Along with your request for authorization, you will need to submit a copy of the manuscript to the national liturgy office. In the United States you would need to write the USCCB Secretariat of Divine Worship, 3211 Fourth Street, NE, Washington, DC 20017. Should you wish to proceed at this time, I will be pleased to send you a list of addresses of the various other national liturgy offices.
When you have received authorization from the Conference(s) of Bishops, we will draft a permission granting the rights to publish within those territories in which authorization has been secured. For most non-commercial uses of ICEL material, no fee is usually charged by ICEL
It may help you to know that ICEL is a non-profit organization, whose assets belong entirely to its member Conferences of Bishops. The Commission in its early days was funded by its member Conferences, each Conference contributing a share of the total sum in proportion to the number of Catholics estimated to reside in its territory. When income began to come in from royalties, surplus funds (which amounted to over two and one half times the original cost of establishing the Commission) were distributed in the early years to the Conferences, divided according to the same ratio as their contributions. In recent years, royalty income has been used to fund the long process of translation of the Missale Romanum. Thanks to this income, it has not been necessary to request any contribution from member Conferences. When income increases, as is to be expected with the publication of a new Missal, the surplus will again be distributed among the Conferences.
The copyright ensures that the integrity of texts is preserved and that the rights of the Conferences to regulate their use are protected. The copyright is, therefore, a means of discouraging the issuance of inaccurate or unfinished or unapproved or unduly altered texts of the Church’s Liturgy.
As you may know, the ecumenical ICET texts (Gloria in excelsis, Nicene and Apostles’ Creeds, Preface Dialogue, Sanctus, Agnus Dei) were not under copyright, which partially explains changes made by individual composers to these texts.
Should you have any questions concerning the ICEL publication policies, you may wish to consult the ICEL Web Site, www.icelweb.org. I will also be pleased to respond, as best I can, to any additional questions you may have.
I thank you for your kind attention in these matters and wish you all the best.
Yours sincerely,
Peter C. Finn
Peter Finn
Associate Executive Director
International Commission on English in the Liturgy
1522 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005-1202
Phone: 202-347-0800
FAX: 202-347-1839
PFinn@eliturgy.org
This highlight, which comes closest to answering the initial question, seems most ominous:“For most non-commercial uses of ICEL material, no fee is usually charged by ICEL.”
To which I ask: “What do you mean by usually? Can you give an example of a where ICEL charged a fee for non-commercial use of their texts? Is there a formula to this determination, or is it purely arbitrary?”
Another gem:As you may know, the ecumenical ICET texts (Gloria in excelsis, Nicene and Apostles’ Creeds, Preface Dialogue, Sanctus, Agnus Dei) were not under copyright, which partially explains changes made by individual composers to these texts.
The desire to avoid ICEL’s royalties would seem to be another partial explanation for composers to set the ICET texts, change or no change.
"I am not sure how an argument like this would work with regard to distributing free copies of music online that includes copyrighted words (as per the unnamed psalm website), but technically it would seem to fall in the same category. I'm not defending or criticizing current US copyright law, just pointing some things out."
To participate in the discussions on Catholic church music, sign in or register as a forum member, The forum is a project of the Church Music Association of America.