While I am not a fan of politicizing Mass, it is perfectly legitimate to "localize" it to some degree. First of all we have the principal of "inculturation" (sorely abused, but legitimate at any rate), second of all, patriotism is actually a virtue (St. Thomas teaches that we should cultivate a healthy sense of fealty to our Fatherland), and lastly, things such as local patronal feasts are to be observed, even when they are not "universal". St. So-and-So's feast day isn't celebrated by everyone, but it sure is celebrated at St. So-and-so's parish (one hopes at least). So to outright ignore something important culturally speaking seems to me a case of being obtuse just for the sake of it. That said, all masses in America on July 4th shouldn't turn into patriotic sing-alongs either... but a nod of a single well-chosen hymn hardly seems inappropriate in the grand scheme of things.
Please refer to the encyclical on AmericanismThe "local" feasts don't include Independence Day. They don't include this one because
1)it celebrates separatism; 2)the country it initiated isn't Catholic England restored, but Enlightenment-based, Masonic-realised anti-Catholic America.
Why? I would offer the same comments to an Austrian or an Australian. The concept has nothing to do with America in se.Please refer to the encyclical on Americanism
The "local" feasts don't include Independence Day.
The liturgical year is also no stranger to historic events that took place after biblical times. The 1962 General Calendar, for example, has commemorations of pivotal battles (Belgrade, Lepanto, Vienna, Rome) and important ecumenical councils (Ephesus).
Yet the commemoration of these events follows two rules. First, the event itself is of special significance to Church history. The Battles of Belgrade (1456), Lepanto (1570), and Vienna (1683) were key military victories by Catholics to stop the Muslim conquest of Europe. The 1849 defeat of the insurgents of the Roman Republic by the French army allowed the Pope to return to Rome from exile. The Council of Ephesus, which defined Mary as the Mother of God, provided a theological understanding of Marian devotion.
However—and this brings us to the second rule—these events are never commemorated directly, but subordinated to a mystery of Christ, His mother, or the Saints. There is no “Battle of Lepanto” on the calendar, but there is a feast of the Holy Rosary (October 7) which was instituted in gratitude for the battle’s outcome. Nor is there a “Battle of Belgrade,” a “Battle of Vienna,” or a “Liberation of Rome,” but there are feasts of the Transfiguration (August 6), of the Holy Name of Mary (September 12), and of the Most Precious Blood (July 1). Even a sacred ecumenical Council like that of Ephesus does not appear as such, but as the feast of the Maternity of the Blessed Virgin Mary (October 11).
The inclusion of American civic holidays on the Church calendar—the Proper Calendar for the Dioceses of the United States of America lists July 4 as “Independence Day”—violates both these principles. American Catholics can certainly be grateful for the many blessings the Founding has given them, but Independence Day is no more a Catholic event than Napoleon’s defeat at Waterloo: it is not liturgically significant. Sadly, it sometimes seems that the contemporary Church in America spends half her time demoting the sacred to the level of the secular (in the case of irreverent Masses) and the other half elevating the secular to the level of the sacred.
Finally, according to Vatican II’s Sacrosanctum Concilium, “there must be no innovations unless the good of the Church genuinely and certainly requires them” (23). It is difficult to see how the Mass for Independence Day meets this criterion.
Michael P. Foley
I guess the point I am making is that this is a novel undertaking by our Americanized bishops, and it is attached to the NO... not the Roman Calendar.Yes, they do. The optional memorial for Independence Day is the mass Da Pacem with proper collects and even a proper Preface written for the day, where we recall that "[Christ's] message took form in the vision of our founding fathers as they fashioned a nation where we might live as one."
However—and this brings us to the second rule—these events are never commemorated directly, but subordinated to a mystery of Christ, His mother, or the Saints. There is no “Battle of Lepanto” on the calendar....
by our Americanized bishops
and it is attached to the NO... not the Roman Calendar
the TLM rarely includes hymns in the Mass. If it does they are always in Latin.
Independence Day stands as the day we (Americans) declared that we weren't subject to legitimate authority*, and began the process of founding a country based on (inter alia) indifferentism, amorality, the Rights of Man and other ideas incompatible with the Catholic faith. To celebrate such with a proper Mass is.... incongruous with the truth.
Under the law and customs of the English, proper Englishness stops at England's border, beyond which are wogs of different degrees. Anglophiles never really get this.
To participate in the discussions on Catholic church music, sign in or register as a forum member, The forum is a project of the Church Music Association of America.