Let us all not forget that Paul VI himself blatantly described the new rite in his audience in November 26, 1969. He stated the very intentions of what the 'novel' rite would actually be and how it would impact the church.The evidence that the two Missals are irreconcilable isn't only asserted by staunch traditionalists. It's asserted by non-Popes such as Fr. Gelineau, and by Popes such as Francis.
This audience can be easily obtained on the interwebs.Pope Paul VI : Address to a General Audience, November 26, 1969
...liturgical innovation of the new rite of the Mass.
...a change in a venerable tradition that has gone on for centuries.
...something that affects our hereditary religious patrimony, which seemed to enjoy the privilege of being untouchable and settled. It seemed to bring the prayer of our forefathers and our saints to our lips and to give us the comfort of feeling faithful to our spiritual past, which we kept alive to pass it on to the generations ahead.
...We shall become aware, perhaps with some feeling of annoyance, that the ceremonies at the altar are no longer being carried out with the same words and gestures to which we were accustomed—
...We must prepare for this many-sided inconvenience.
...It is the kind of upset caused by every novelty that breaks in on our habits.
...We shall notice that pious persons are disturbed most
...Even priests may feel some annoyance in this respect.
...This novelty is no small thing. We should not let ourselves be surprised by the nature, or even the nuisance, of its exterior forms.
...As intelligent persons and conscientious faithful we should find out as much as we can about this innovation. (NOTE: WE ARE ALL DEFINITELY DOING THIS!!!!)
...we shall do well to take into account the motives for this grave change. (NOTE: we are trying to do well to take into account the motives, you can be sure.)
...This moment is shaking the Church, arousing it, obliging it to renew the mysterious art of its prayer. (NOTE: The irony of this statement is that the church has definitely been 'aroused' and is renewing (returning) to it's tradition!)
...It is here that the greatest newness is going to be noticed, the newness of language. No longer Latin, but the spoken language will be the principal language of the Mass. The introduction of the vernacular will certainly be a great sacrifice for those who know the beauty, the power and the expressive sacrality of Latin.
...We are parting with the speech of the Christian centuries; we are becoming like profane intruders in the literary preserve of sacred utterance. (NOTE: um, I don't think you 'are becoming'... it appears that you already ARE the greatest of intruders...) We will lose a great part of that stupendous and incomparable artistic and spiritual thing, the Gregorian chant.
...We have reason indeed for regret, reason almost for bewilderment. What can we put in the place of that language of the angels? We are giving up something of priceless worth. But why? What is more precious than these loftiest of our Church's values?
...The answer will seem banal, prosaic. (NOTE: yup, it is.)
...If the divine Latin language kept us apart from the children, from youth, from the world of labor and of affairs, if it were a dark screen, not a clear window, would it be right for us fishers of souls to maintain it as the exclusive language of prayer and religious intercourse? (NOTE: The Mass is NOT a dialogue with the world. On that supposition alone this is a very deceptive invitation.)
.We shall notice that pious persons are disturbed most
..We are parting with the speech of the Christian centuries; we are becoming like profane intruders in the literary preserve of sacred utterance.
.If the divine Latin language kept us apart from the children, from youth, from the world of labor and of affairs, if it were a dark screen, not a clear window, would it be right for us fishers of souls to maintain it as the exclusive language of prayer and religious intercourse?
This is certainly my experience. They are only disturbed by my being disturbed.Does this mean that those who are NOT pious are those who are NOT disturbed?
Moreover, the new rite of Mass establishes that the faithful are to "learn to sing 'together, in Latin, at least the parts of the Ordinary of the Mass, and especially the Creed and the Lord's Prayer, the Our Father" (n. 19). But we also remember, an admonition and a consolation, that Latin will not disappear from our Church because of this; it will remain the noble language of official acts of the Apostolic See; it will remain as a teaching instrument of ecclesiastical studies and as a key of access to the patrimony of our religious, historical, and humanistic culture, and if possible, in flourishing splendor. [My translation.]
Ma del resto il nuovo rito della Messa stabilisce che i fedeli «sappiano cantare ‘insieme, in lingua latina, almeno le parti dell’ordinario della Messa, e specialmente il simbolo della fede e la preghiera del Signore, il Padre nostro» (n. 19). Ma ricordiamolo bene, a nostro monito e a nostro conforto: non per questo il latino nella nostra Chiesa scomparirà; esso rimarrà la nobile lingua degli atti ufficiali della Sede Apostolica; resterà come strumento scolastico degli studi ecclesiastici e come chiave d’accesso al patrimonio della nostra cultura religiosa, storica ed umanistica; e, se possibile, in rifiorente splendore.
... But be very sure of one point: nothing of the substance of the traditional Mass has been altered. Some people might let themselves be persuaded that a particular ceremony or its accompanying rubric involves or implies an altering or lessening of the truth received once for ever and authoritatively guaranteed by Catholic Truth. They might conclude that the equation between the lex orandi and the lex credendi has been jeopardized.This is absolutely not the case. ...
.This is absolutely not the case. ...
...Bring me the broom of the wicked witch of the west! (smoke and loud voice)... But be very sure of one point: nothing of the substance of the traditional Mass has been altered. Some people might let themselves be persuaded that a particular ceremony or its accompanying rubric involves or implies an altering or lessening of the truth received once for ever and authoritatively guaranteed by Catholic Truth. They might conclude that the equation between the lex orandi and the lex credendi has been jeopardized.This is absolutely not the case. ...
[1] Dearly beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits if they be of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. [2] By this is the spirit of God known. Every spirit which confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh, is of God: [3] And every spirit that dissolveth Jesus, is not of God: and this is Antichrist, of whom you have heard that he cometh, and he is now already in the world. [4] You are of God, little children, and have overcome him. Because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world. [5] They are of the world: therefore of the world they speak, and the world heareth them.[1] "Try the spirits": Viz., by examining whether their teaching be agreeable to the rule of the Catholic faith, and the doctrine of the church. For as he says, (ver. 6,) He that knoweth God, heareth us [the pastors of the church]. By this we know the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.
[2] "Every spirit which confesseth": Not that the confession of this point of faith alone, is, at all times, and in all cases, sufficient; but that with relation to that time, and for that part of the Christian doctrine, which was then particularly to be confessed, taught, and maintained against the heretics of those days, this was the most proper token, by which the true teachers might be distinguished from the false.
[3] "That dissolveth Jesus": Viz., either by denying his humanity, or his divinity.
[3] "He is now already in the world": Not in his person, but in his spirit, and in his precursors.
[I would also add that to 'dissolveth Jesus' is to dissolve the tradition (magisterium).]
[6] We are of God. He that knoweth God, heareth us. He that is not of God, heareth us not. By this we know the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.
1 John 4:1—6, DRB
[23] Then if any man shall say to you: Lo here is Christ, or there, do not believe him. [24] For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. [25] Behold I have told it to you, beforehand.
Jesus to his disciples in the book of Matthew.
To participate in the discussions on Catholic church music, sign in or register as a forum member, The forum is a project of the Church Music Association of America.