Melo, you are much, much too kind.
In order of brilliancy:
Robert Bridges
...much more startling...
Would "having a significant number of fine hymn texts sung often today in worship" be one of these criteria? Or should it be "having a significant number of fine hymn texts included in hymnals presently in use (whether those texts are often sung or not)"? What constitutes "a significant number"? Ten or more? Five or more?
"Christ is made the sure foundation" is Neale's translation of Angularis fundamentum (Urbs beata Jerusalem, part II).Other than "Christ Is Made the Sure Foundation," what text that Neale authored has wide circulation today?
Other than "Christ Is Made the Sure Foundation,"what text that Neale authored has wide circulation today?
Forty thousand hymnal editors can't be wrong.
So then, because the vast majority of the populace don't read Homer, don't listen to Bach, don't communicate with a Michaelangelo painting, they are not great artists?
Also, you aren't addressing the issue, which is whether or not that is a melancholic text. No, it is not.
Likewise, the Vaughan merely illustrates that there is more to "gladsome" than you have yet admitted.
Also, for use of "I" and "me," see the Psalms. And their antiphons.
Other than "Christ Is Made the Sure Foundation," what text that Neale authored has wide circulation today?
Other than "Christ Is Made the Sure Foundation," what text that Neale authored has wide circulation today?
A Hymn of Glory Let Us Sing.
I have been concerned only about addressing the subject of this thread:
Great English-language Hymn Authors
For that matter, why are you hating on Cowper and his painful weaknesses?
Must be a bad hair day for some people in the world.
I don't hate Cowper. I've never met the man.
To participate in the discussions on Catholic church music, sign in or register as a forum member, The forum is a project of the Church Music Association of America.