The Institute of Christ the King presented a workshop over the weekend, at St. Francis de Sales Oratory in St. Louis, Missouri.
Nearly every apostolate was represented.
I really enjoyed the workshop.
Here is the music we sang for the Mass:
CHANT Mode 4 Asperges Me Propers Mass XVII Sanctus only Credo II Mass XVII Benedicamus Domino
Procession: Jaquet de Mantua O Jesu Christe At Offertory: F. Suriano Ave Regina Coelorum At Communion: Attende Domine, arr. John Osterhagen. Available from CanticaNOVA [choir sang only the Refrain] Kyrie and Benedictus Joseph Rheinberger, Mass in G Agnus Dei Claudio Casciolini
We also chanted Vespers and Compline, including the Ave Regina Caelorum festal tone
Many thanks to our professors (Canons Huberfeld and Lebocq, and Mr. Nicholas Botkins, for ) and to our host, Canon Wiener.
One particularly noteworthy detail: I understand Chironomy much better than I did previously.
No disparagement meant, Chris, but how better do you understand chironomy. I'm notbeing facetious, but having read and studied it for quite some years it remains to me a highly subjective species of hand movements which, presumably, are related to the contours of a chant melos. I think that any talented choirmaster who knows chant could direct it as well without consciously performing chironomy, chironomy being rather different in every book that has ever been written about it and every chanteur who has ever performed it.
Until this weekend, I would have entirely agreed with you about "a highly subjective species of hand movements". I saw a well-reasoned presentation by Canon Lebocq. It reminded me of a presentation by a priest from the National Bioethics center some years ago, which rendered lucid some very technical points of bioethics, philosophy and genetics.
In general, though, I still agree with the notion that any singer who is now a choirmaster has a sense of how to direct chant. Too few chant singers direct, though.
Chris - I'll take your word about Canon Lebocq. I think, though, that one could expect his presentation to render lucid what before wasn't, at least what wasn't in relation to it. I would maintain that this lucidity is self-referential solely to his own highly subjective approach and that his 'lucidation' had validity only in relation to his interpretation.
I don't, though, wish to dispute this further. Perhaps it would be constructive for you to share some of Canon Lebocq's method for our enlightenment.
To participate in the discussions on Catholic church music, sign in or register as a forum member, The forum is a project of the Church Music Association of America.