Last night at schola rehearsal it became abundantly clear to me that I have failed to pass along my love for ictus markings to the schola members. One person finally asked me (as we were in the middle of marking up a new piece) why we were spending the time doing it. She could see that it probably has use for me in directing, but couldn't see any real benefit for herself as a singer. I tried many different explanations, but could see I wasn't making contact.
I think I never really questioned the usefulness myself (I just wanted to learn how to do it). Can someone help me with a good, clear, convincing reason why schola members should understand about ictus locations and why understanding the rules in marking them are helpful to them as singers?
[On a happy note, they are very convinced about solfege and see its usefulness -- even if they groan when we have a solfege exercise].
We mark ictus locations because it helps us stay together perfectly.
A chant line should have shape. You cannot give shape to something that does not stick together. Marking locations of ictus provides singers with a sense of what binds the chant line together. Instead of singing 1-1-1-1-1-1-1, you come to see things like 12 123 12 123 12 1... Experience suggests that better legato singing will result.
Also, marking ictus helps to provide bouyancy to the chant. There is a tendency in some singers to hammer away at text accents as if they were bludgeoning cats. Talking about "upbeat" and "singing smoothly over those 12 12 12's" helps to keep the sung line afloat, as it were. It helps to mitigate against ponderous accents.
The ictus also marks the beginning of a gesture which can be described as either arsis or thesis. Of course the large-scale shape of the phrase, or of the entire chant, is probably of greater importance. But having these subtle shadings of rising and falling, elan and repos, keeps the musical line in motion at every small step along the way.
The main reason is that it provides a method for counting through the chant, which gives an idea of forward direction. to me, the main advantage is that it prevents getting stuck or slowing down.
yes, the forward motion is important in music.
So ictus is as essential as solfege. (It's just more subltle to realize that.) It's the rhythm that gives music 'life.'
By the way our schola is learning Communion chant "Qui manducat,' which I love.(The text is really the core of our faith, and the music is so beautiful. I can talk about this forever.) We listen to Stepping stone Cd and another one by a famous group who I believe in a 'different style'. We all agreed that Stepping stone sounds better than the other. The other had too much contrast of long pause and the fast notes for neums, I think. Too much contrast of musical elements seem to be not quite right in chant singing. (Another advantage of ictus. Control of the rhythm, not sounding random. I hope this is not starting another heated discussion of the two different styles of singing chants.(although I learned a lot from it.) It's just my opinion)
Janet, you are 'lucky' that your group don't mind solfege. I had a long talk about it, because a couple of members in my group believe that they don't need it. They say that they always sang songs just by ear (one is in a folk group also.) and they can get by. Spending time and effort on learning solfege is more than what they want to do. (Another words, music is just a music. It can be that serious.) Well, I guess I'm too serious that I spent all my life learning music, and I still have so much to learn.
Mia, I'm having similar issues with the singers in my schola. Smile, and make them do it anyway. A few times I have learned two chants during rehearsal- one with solfege and one by rote. So far they understand and 'own' the ones they have to solfege and think harder to learn.
Thank you all for your help... You have given me several more points I can use to encourage them. I have no intention of stopping with either rhythmic markings or solfege... I want them to all learn the methodology so that they aren't orphaned when I am transferred again.
Mia: We have been singing Qui manducat during this season as well. Since we are still beginners, it is too much to try to do propers for every week. We are trying to add the 'ad libitum' Communion chants to our repertoire so that we can give ourselves time to learn other new chants and still be prepared for weekly Mass.
Pes: Can I quote you on the 'bludgeoning cats' comment? I think that will probably help a great deal!!!
This week we learned two new chant hymns -- Ave Maris Stella and the Pange Lingua. They loved both of them. It provides a bit of a rest working on hymns from the PBC (as opposed to propers). I can tell such a huge difference from when we first began... it would have taken a much longer time for them to learn two new chant hymns... now they are picking it up so quickly. We solfeged the first part of the Ave Maris (particularly that part on the STEL-LA where the notes go: re do ti la sol la) and they very quickly saw how essential the solfege was for getting the notes right.
I'm go to 'bludgeon' a few cats next week and hit the topic again with your suggestions!
Four of us are going to the SM workshop in Sugar Land, TX in February with Scott Turkington... perhaps that experience of working with him will also help...
It's so tempting to answer "because I say so," the way one's mother did. It is all about forward movement in chant. I haven't broken the "ictus bad news" to my schola yet because the solfege whimpering has to die down to a respectable level and we're getting ready to sing on Candlemas.
It is my recollection that Scott suggested initially delivering already marked-up music to your singers, particularly if time is an issue. Actually, I think they'll be happy to sing 1-2,1-2,1-2-3, etc. after their weekly dose of solfege.
Most of the time I do give them pre-marked music. However, when it is a song from their PBC books, there isn't such an easy shortcut. All the propers I give them are pre-marked up... Besides, those chant hymns in there are really pretty easy to do, so it seems not very hard to me... but then, I'm not exactly neutral on the subject...
I usually do have them sing in rhythm before we do solfege, so they really must have those markings if they want to participate!
Okay, another "chant 101" question here (more like "chant 001"), but I just want to be absolutely sure… the vertical ictus mark indicates that that note is "1," correct?
Mark, The answer is yes. Scott's rule #1 on ictus, "don't change the monks' markings."
Thanks Singing Mum for reminding me of the SMILE. I couldn't do that at first. But I manage to do it later and said
'well, I guess we all learn differently, so for that, can we spend about 5 to 10 minutes for solfege? There are only 7 names to remember (with one variant). God gave us many good things in 7;-) She laughed and said, "Mia, you are convincing me." We had a good laugh together. I'm not good in making jokes, but smiles do help. I think they start to see the need as they progress to more complicated music.
Janet, that's good you are going to Scott's workshop. I went to the one in VA last October with my 3 other schola members. They were very impressed, encouraged and had a good time talking with other chanters too. (They were also convinced that I was not making up things like ictus and all...;-)
To participate in the discussions on Catholic church music, sign in or register as a forum member, The forum is a project of the Church Music Association of America.