Philippe Lefebvre's Entree improvisation - What do you think?
  • CHGiffenCHGiffen
    Posts: 5,193
    They do things differently in France:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZ-pZp1FQPE
    Thanked by 2CharlesW irishtenor
  • Given that this isn't a traditional Mass, is this nearly the entire French church?
    Thanked by 1irishtenor
  • chonakchonak
    Posts: 9,216
    KTO shows Mass from Notre Dame on Sundays at 18:30 local time, a replay of the Mass usually celebrated by the Archbishop. Vespers is aired at 17:45.
    Thanked by 1CHGiffen
  • chonakchonak
    Posts: 9,216
    I rather like the bold entree, though I might have felt it too loud in the cathedral itself. Hearing an old Lucien Deiss song afterward was a bit anticlimactic.
    Thanked by 1Ben
  • matthewjmatthewj
    Posts: 2,700
    I'm a big fan of the processional candles.
  • Given that this isn't a traditional Mass, is this nearly the entire French church?


    Yes, the entire Catholic population of France has to go to Paris and pack themselves into Notre Dame. They have people pushers at the doors, like the Japanese do in the subways, to get everyone in.

    Cardinals there are not allowed to wear bridal-like trains...takes up too much space. And those things really confuse the protestants...and many catholics as well, so the French are being practice yet once again.

    It was impressive how many people were singing for the Deiss...but it's the old tried and true Catholic formula, the more you do that same music over and over again, the more people sing.

  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,980
    Given that this isn't a traditional Mass, is this nearly the entire French church?


    You seriously underestimate French Catholicism.
  • ...bit anticlimactic...

    to say the least... and then some!!!
    On the Solemnity of the Baptism of the Lord, yet.

    It has at least as much gravitas as a Taize service.
    It's really disappointing to see that our once admired European cousins have fallen for the same infantile folksiness as most of our fellow Americans.
    Um, did I read somewhere that Marty Haugen studied with Lucien Diess?

    (But the organ voluntary was nice.)

    Thanked by 1CHGiffen
  • I find it extremely refreshing to see top-notch organ improv melding with a congregational antiphon and cantor verses. To me, much more interesting musically than an entrance hymn (and, though I have no French and can't speak to this particular piece, presumably this format is more conducive to singing propers). It may be Deiss, but it's far, far better than most of what passes for liturgical music over here.

    The only thing, having watched a lot of Notre Dame liturgy, is that there is often such a disconnect between the musical style/language of the sung piece and the organ fanfares preceding it.
  • Call me stupid but I really don't like French organists because they seem to think that tutti for the entire processional improvisation. I would like to hear a bit more variety
    Thanked by 1BruceL
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,980
    Call me stupid but I really don't like French organists because they seem to think that tutti for the entire processional improvisation. I would like to hear a bit more variety


    Maybe they are playing for the older folks whose hearing has declined. The French seem attracted to a bit of grandeur despite themselves. However, if I had a Cavaillé-Coll, I would play the h*ll out of it, too. But that is the charm of the French - they don't care what anyone else thinks. They have always done as they pleased.
  • @CharlesW
    Why would you need to make that much noise from a Cavaillé-Coll just for the hearing impaired? The celebrant and the homily, the much more important parts of the mass are not as loud because the sound system simply cannot match the volume of an organ. I don't really find the music appropriate for a processional either, maybe a fanfare or a trumpet tune or voluntary, but just improv on chords on pretty much tutti, I don't really thing it is very respectful of a prayerful environment. Maybe on Easter or something like that but even then, I still would use a fanfare.
  • You are merely from a totally different musical tradition. The French tradition brought us all the wonderful toccatas and what you are hearing there today.

    You are assuming that the loudness of the organ is filling the church...which it really is not.

    In huge churches like this you are indeed moving a lot of air, but there is a humongous amount of air in the building. The only people that get the effect you are mentioning are up at the console and way in the back of the church. You'll be surprised how soft that sound is when it reaches the altar.
    Thanked by 1CHGiffen
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,980
    You have to be there since recordings never get the balance right. Sound does interesting things in those cavernous spaces. French organs do have a tendency to roar and I think they like them that way. As I mentioned, they are French and will always do as they like.

    Noel is correct on volume. A number of those instruments have had en chamades added because sufficient volume wasn't reaching the front. You have to visit some of those churches to get an idea of the enormity of the buildings. No flinty German principals or wheezy flutes on the French instruments. Totally different tradition.
    Thanked by 1CHGiffen
  • chonakchonak
    Posts: 9,216
    In case anyone did not recognize the Deiss song, the English counterpart has this refrain:

    "The Spirit of God rests upon me,
    The Spirit of God consecrates me,
    The Spirit of God bids me go forth to proclaim his peace, his joy."

    It was commonly sung in America in the '80s.
    Thanked by 1CHGiffen
  • kevinfkevinf
    Posts: 1,191
    No, the organ does not fill up that space, though it comes off as rather full. I have been there enough to say that it is quite exciting.

    Also, the tradition regarding improvisation is remarkable. Though admittedly, some stretch the limits of what many can tolerate.

    I confess that the entrance procession there is nothing short of spectacular. We have nothing on NDdP on that question. I just hate the little box of an altar. Brutalist work in a Gothic space...bleah.
    Thanked by 2CHGiffen BruceL
  • ronkrisman
    Posts: 1,394
    It was commonly sung in America in the '80s.

    I think it is more accurate to say "in the '70s" than "in the '80s."
  • KARU27
    Posts: 184
    I think it is more accurate to say "in the '70s" than "in the '80s."

    If only. I'm a convert of eight years, and I know I've heard this recently. Possibly even at our cathedral.
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,980
    I remember Deiss compositions being in vogue in the 70s. In our part of the world they had fallen into disuse by the 80s. I still have some of that music in my filing cabinets but it hasn't been used in a long time - yes, I know I never throw anything away. LOL.
  • chonakchonak
    Posts: 9,216
    I'll take Fr. K's word on when that song peaked; I never attended Mass until '77.
  • We sang Diess at St Ambrose, Houston, in the late 60's.
    I thought it was folksy, clutzy, and insipid then, and I still do.
    (Oh! I left out 'maudlin'.)
    It is not ecclesiastical music fit for liturgy and ritual.
    It is not fitting for any solemnity, such as that featured on this thread - in one of Christendom's most exalted churches, yet.

    (This really is an innocent and genuine question: is there the equivalent anywhere in France of Westminster Cathedral, the London Oratory, or, um, Walsingham? Surely there must be.... somewhere? You'd think that if there were, it would be Notre Dame de Paris. But is there, anywhere? And if there is, why don't we hear about it?)

    And, echoing what Charles said above, one might throw in that the French are not the only ones who 'do as they please'. Americans, I think, get the highest (or, should one say 'the lowest') marks for that.

    But, when the French do as they please they frequently set a benchmark for impeccable, if daring, taste, to wit: who else would have put a modernist glass pyramid smack dab in front of... the Louvre! (just for one example). Yes, when the French are moderne, they are daringly tasteful about it. Not so our people over here (no imagination).

    On the other hand, when the French do clutz (as in Diess) their clutz is better than anyone else's.

    Thanked by 2CHGiffen advocatus
  • MatthewRoth
    Posts: 2,315
    That’s the thing. The French have a chant-based choral tradition, but their hymns are pious and devotional but abhorrent in sound to Anglo-Saxon ears. Their hymns are true folk tunes. The songbook of the Chartres walk demonstrates this, and that isn’t even a cathedral setting using “contemporary” music (folk-ish style) that would be usually sung at the Novus Ordo; they sing French hymns during Communion on the walk, which bugs me. Oh well.
  • SalieriSalieri
    Posts: 3,177
    I am no expert on French Catholicism, I can only repeat what I have read. But, it seems that musicians like Messiaen were very upset when, after the Council, the chant came to be replaced by the folksy cantiques religieuses. I somehow have the feeling that if the Entree were followed by the Gregorian Introit, the disconnect might not have been so strongly felt, since the the french tradition of improvisation developed in a chant-infused environ. For me it's not so much the organ that is out of place as the Deiss.

    On the other hand, the French, like everyone else, have also had their fair share of terrible music for centuries: For every Franck, Faure', or Widor there were at least 30 popular but terrible composers. Deiss is really just following in the footsteps of his predecessors.
  • Some thoughts on the topics offered in the thread:

    - Sitting next to the choir organ console, when the GO is roaring, it sounds quite pleasant, and not at all like in the videos. They've got mics all over the cathedral for the tv broadcast, and I'm sure they use some too close to the GO to get a fair representation.

    - Attending a number of liturgies in ND this past summer—in the congregation, next to the choir organ and in the tribune, I never found the organs to be overbearing, though some improvisations would have gotten me fired in my own parish if I used that harmonic language.

    - A lot of the Diess songs popular in the US had English texts shoe-horned into a French melody. The originals sound much better.

    - If you look at the overall output of liturgical music when Diess was writing, I find it difficult to be overly critical as his at least tend to be scriptural. It seems to have been in a different league than the output of publishing houses like FEL... I hate to make such a broad generalization, as there are exceptions to every rule, but that's my overall impression.

    Marc
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,980
    Their hymns are true folk tunes.


    So are their Noels. I play a number of works based on them every year and they tend to be based on French carols. They have a native folk music.
    Thanked by 1MatthewRoth
  • chonakchonak
    Posts: 9,216
    Orthography note: Deiss.
  • The Noels appreciate your comment.
  • chonakchonak
    Posts: 9,216
    If the misspellings were to continue, I might suffer from Diess irae!
  • MatthewRoth
    Posts: 2,315
    Some suffer from that when they hear music by said composer.
  • Now, that didn't really need to be in purple, did it!?
  • advocatusadvocatus
    Posts: 85
    Where I come from (Northeastern Wisconsin), Lucien Deiss's star had faded by the mid-'70s, replaced by The St. Louis Jesuits and the others in the original Glory & Praise book. A few of the Deiss pieces ("Grant to us, O Lord," "Priestly People," "The Spirit of God," survived in the more conservative parishes that used either the Paluch Missalette or WLP's The People's Mass Book, but that was it.

    I'm sure Jean Langlais and Olivier Messiaen did lament the advent of this kind of popular liturgical music, but in hindsight and in comparison to what has become de rigeur in some publishing houses, the liturgical music of Deiss might warrant a second look if not a revival. Taken together the published Deiss oeuvre is indeed biblical and liturgical, the melodies are often modal, rhythmically flexible, and there is consistently good voice-leading. No one would claim it is "great" music on its own, but I would say that if one takes great offense at its use, one should get out more. :-)

    Kevin Vogt

    (All due respect to MJO, with whom I tend agree on most things.)
  • ...get out more...

    Ha! Advocatus. The trouble is that every time I decide to 'get out more', I run into things like Deiss, or Haugen, or worse. This dynamic does not encourage 'getting out more'. (Although your comment above does seem reasonable reasoned.)
  • Just came across this version of the Stabat Mater, which further shows that they have been enjoying grandiose music in France for a long time...with this, probably even during Lent.

    The original version was also available for organ and orchestra - all at imslp.

    Guilmant Stabat Mater

    This all ties into my usual rant that people sing and enjoying hearing music with tunes that are familiar to them.

    Just found this [another version by Guilmant] which sounds as if it's a good example of the Italian Voce Umana.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBnXPwQFBVM
    Thanked by 1CHGiffen