Ordinary Form Latin Vespers
  • Our parish would like to begin chanting Ordinary Form Vespers in Latin. I've looked high and low for a resource that contains the chants we need and can find nothing! It seems rather absurd—at minimum all one would need is the three psalm antiphons, the Magnificat antiphon, and the responsory. Everything else can be pointed to a psalm tone or derived from the lectionary (even the English lectionary) easily enough. Can anyone help us find what we need? Many thanks!
  • RobertRobert
    Posts: 343
    All you need is the Antiphonale Romanum II (Vesperale) which can be ordered here:

    http://www.paracletepress.com/antiphonale-romanum-ii.html

    or here

    https://www.giamusic.com/search_details.cfm?title_id=17404

    Alternately, there is this resource:

    http://www.kleingraduale.nl/LiturgiaHorarum/

    The advantage over the ARII is that the material is free to download. The main drawback is that unlike the ARII the psalms are not pointed.
  • This is really great, thanks! We are in a position where we can't purchase enough Antiphonali (plural?) for our choir and the few in the congregation who would like to follow along, so the Kleingraduale would be a great option... except for one thing: the parish has choral Vespers scheduled on Thursdays. The Kleingraduale is a beautiful resource for Sunday Vespers, but there are no provisions for weekday Vespers. Do you happen to know of a free resource that would have the chants for the antiphons and responsory for weekday Vespers?
  • VilyanorVilyanor
    Posts: 388
    As of yet, there isn't something that contains them all in one place that perfectly follows either the 1983 OCO or the 2015 revision. Dominican-liturgy.blogspot.com has Divine Office books that might be close enough for your immediate needs, but a few antiphons are off from the 1983 OCO and many more from the 2015. Also, they use Dominican chant notation, which is easy enough for short antiphons, but has different interpretive meanings.

    I'm slowly working on putting together for publication a Lauds and Vespers antiphonal in Latin and English for every day of the year, but I don't expect to be done for a couple of years.
  • RevAMG
    Posts: 162
    It is by no means inexpensive, but Les Heures Grégoriennes, published by the Communauté Saint-Martin, is really what you are looking for if you need weekday Vespers. The ARII won't help you there. Take a look at their website (in French).
    Thanked by 1nun_34
  • rarty
    Posts: 96
    Really, since the rubrics are so accommodating and the resources scarce, saying the previous Sunday's Vespers (or to fill in the "missing" parts) on a ferial Thursday seems possible and legitimate (cf. GILH 245, 246, 252).

    It does lock down things for Lent, the last week of Advent, and during octaves though.
    Thanked by 1CorAnglais16
  • Thanks for all the suggestions, everyone. We are still evaluating our options—maybe EF is the way to go as the resources there should be very easy to find (though one of the selling points of OF Vespers is that it's short; EF Vespers' length may prove unmanageable in our context).
  • RobertRobert
    Posts: 343
    The difference in length between EF and OF vespers in practice isn't as much as you might think - two fewer psalms in OF, sure, but there's a longer reading, the intercessions, and the Our Father to take into account.

    For OF you're looking at things changing from week to week - 9 different antiphons and two different hymns over the 4 week cycle. Not sure what your circumstance is, but in an average parish it will be difficult for people to become familiar with the antiphons and psalms this way.

    I'm sure one of us could help you out by compiling a resource, but is OF Vespers really the way you want to go?
  • tomjaw
    Posts: 2,782
    EF Solemn Vespers with Benediction takes us just under 1 hour. The exact time depends on how long the psalms, hymn, and how long the celebrant takes to incense the Altar(s).

    This may help...
    http://gregorian-chant-hymns.com/publications/liturgy-of-hours.html
    Thanked by 1Don9of11
  • is OF Vespers really the way you want to go?

    Musically speaking, OF anything is never the way we really want to go ;-)

    Given the extremely permissive rubrics (akin to "... or any other chant" showing up everywhere in the GIRM to ridiculous effect in practice), we may just transfer the Sunday OF Vespers and use the Kleingraduale's brilliant resources.
  • VilyanorVilyanor
    Posts: 388
    Unpopular opinion here, but I think that OF Vespers is incredibly beautiful and basically on par with EF Vespers in almost all respects. The New Testament Canticles are a beautiful and well-suited addition. Some people might turn their noses at such an "innovation", but hey, Pius V changed the Benedictus to the Magnificat at Vespers in 1500, so I think there's grounds for the change.
  • RobertRobert
    Posts: 343
    If you decide you need to do OF Vespers, you could assemble your own resource using the material under discussion in another active thread:

    http://forum.musicasacra.com/forum/discussion/13271/oco-1983-antiphonal-copyright-issues#Item_21

    in which forum user igneus discusses the github repository for his project:

    https://github.com/igneus/antiphonale83

    that contains this pdf document with all the antiphons:

    http://antiphonale83.inadiutorium.cz/pdf/psalterium.pdf

    It would be easy to make a booklet using the snapshot tool in Acrobat Reader to capture images of the antiphons, if command line code isn't your thing.

    For the psalms, readings and structure, you could draw on this:

    http://www.almudi.org/images/Portals/0/docs/Breviario/fuentes/breviario.html
    Thanked by 2rarty nun_34
  • Protasius
    Posts: 468
    @Vilyanor: I know that Pius V exchanged the Psalm Miserere for De profundis at Lauds in the ferial Preces, but I have a hard time believing he exchanged Benedictus and Magnificat when every medieval breviary and antiphoner I consulted tell me they were in the same place as they are now. Where have you heard that?
    Thanked by 1Vilyanor
  • VilyanorVilyanor
    Posts: 388
    Mea culpa! Wow, now I feel really dumb. I had read on Wikipedia about reforms, but I had misunderstood when it spoke of reforms and then said that the Magnificat replaced the Benedictus at Vespers to mean that the Magn. replaced it under the reforms, when it was actually saying simply that the Magn. replaces the Ben. between Lauds and Vespers >_< Forgive my inability to read English.
  • Really, since the rubrics are so accommodating and the resources scarce


    @rarty: GILH is an interesting mix of permissiveness and stringence. For example, there is no permission given anywhere to substitute “alius cantus aptus” for the hymn. The psalms may be interchanged, as I recall, however.

    Really, OF Vespers can be done very beautifully. Look at a recent forum thread for how we’ve done them at Annunciation in Houston.
  • rarty
    Posts: 96
    Yeah, but at least for a particular occasion/circumstance, n.245 and n.252 allow for almost any substitution.

    But really, sung weekday/ferial Vespers is tough (in the sense of available resources) for both EF/1962 and NO/LH.

    The most complete and helpful resource might be the Dominican antiphonal, which is http://dominican-liturgy.blogspot.com (as mentioned above, the links for each volume are on the left side). As far as I can tell, it is nearly identical to the Liturgia Horarum and OCO 1983, but with some Dominican idiosyncrasies, like some hymn/responsory melodies and common tones.
  • Really, OF Vespers can be done very beautifully.

    Agreed—we do a few Solemn English OF Vespers every year to lovely effect. But I find Latin anything to be superior to English anything (excepting perhaps the outstanding canticle settings from the English tradition). There's something about Latin that elevates things. I think even an a cappella Latin OF Vespers with nothing but Gregorian Psalm tones will feel more dignified and authentically "Catholic" than any English OF Vespers.
    Thanked by 1Vilyanor
  • But I find Latin anything to be superior to English anything (excepting perhaps the outstanding canticle settings from the English tradition).


    Clearly you have not known any good “down-’n’-dirty” contrafacta of bad Catholic music with Latin texts. ;-)
    Thanked by 2Richard Mix CHGiffen
  • According to the Office books used in the UK/Australia any suitable hymn may be sung. There are hymns given on a two-week cycle, but the appendices make it clear that they may be swapped around or substituted. The cycle of hymns is more a suggestion than anything else. Of course, the hymns given are only for Ordinary Time. One must consult the appendices for the hymns for the various liturgical seasons and any hymn listed may be used.

    Generally speaking, the hymns are fairly generic praise or Trinity hymns for the most part. There is a separate section for compline night prayer which gives hymns more specific to end-of-the-day prayer.
  • benstoxbenstox
    Posts: 23
    OF Vespers is incredibly beautiful and basically on par with EF Vespers in almost all respects


    I certainly agree that OF Vespers can be done well, but I think the censorship of the psalms precludes it from ever being on par with the EF. Even were they uncensored, I would personally also find the Nova Vulgata psalms very annoying, possibly annoying enough to make English preferable if singing OF Vespers.
  • MatthewRoth
    Posts: 2,315
    Plus the ceremony was reduced. I don’t see that as a benefit.
    Thanked by 3Ben tomjaw CHGiffen
  • OraLabora
    Posts: 218
    Our schola does OF Vespers from time to time, last time was the 4th Sunday of Advent, and next will be Laetare Sunday in Lent. Nothing wrong with OF Vespers. We use a mix of AR II and Les Heures Grégoriennes and occasionally AM and Psalterium Monasticum as our resources.

    I myself chant OF Vespers (and Lauds and Sext and Compline) every day in Latin using Les Heures, and occasionally in the monastic schema ("B") that the abbey I'm affiliated with uses, which includes all 150 psalms with no censorship (the LOTH isn't the only licit post-Vatican II Divine Office).

    I don't have any trouble with "censorship" of the psalms because LHG includes the snipped out verses (identified with brackets). I almost always chant them unless I'm in a big hurry...

    In any event the OF Office is far more psalmody than the average layperson would have had before VII when the odd celebration of Sunday or feast day Vespers was all most laity was ever exposed to, and when the Mass tended to only include snippets of psalms in the Propers. Even with the cut out verses. Now the laity are encouraged to pray the Office. I'm all for it. I'm even happy with the Vulgate psalms go figure...

    Ora
    Thanked by 2Vilyanor CHGiffen
  • MatthewRoth
    Posts: 2,315
    Yes, but on what planet is the Office normally more than a cleric’s private devotion? It is only in recent years that the solemn sung Vespers (and other offices, such as Lauds or Compline) has become more accepted again, but only in niche parishes or places (it isn’t right but it’s reality). LOTH reinforced the ostensible problem.

    Also, how many pray more than the 2 psalms of Sunday Vespers, of which only one rotates? I am thus unsure as to how the OF Office can expose one to more psalmody given it suffers from at least the same limits of celebration with a deficient psalter for the majority of the people using it.

    There’s also no singing of the tonus peregrinus on a regular basis. That dates back to the time of the Lord, and it is the sound of Sunday Vespers. It makes me incredibly sad that it was cut.



    On a related note, Sext takes 10 minutes sung recto tono in the older form. Imagine doing the LOTH Terce or Sext before Mass in the new form; you can still finish with the Angelus, but you’d have to move back the Rosary.

    My problem is that no pre-Joannine diurnals (better: pre-1950) can be had without the Bea psalter. That’s worse than the new Vulgate IMHO.

    (Before anyone takes a crack at my preference for an older form, I will note that the psalter is still Pius X, that more texts are prayed so it isn’t as if things are missing, and it’s only a real problem when the September Ember Days are shifted a week due to the 1960 calendar reforms.).
    Thanked by 2Vilyanor CHGiffen
  • Some of the criticisms depend on which version of the liturgy you use and which is the approved psalter.

    I always thought that it was exceedingly strange that there are two English versions of the office. What really needs to happen is for the English-Speaking church to settle on a single English Liturgical Psalter from which the Office, Responsorial Psalms at Mass, and all other psalm-based prayers are based.
  • OraLabora
    Posts: 218
    @Matthew Ross.

    In the LOTH, the Tonus Peregrinus comes up once per 4-week cycle, on Sunday of Week II, for Psalm 113B, in Ordinary Time, as per AR II. In addition in LHG it comes up in the Commons here and there. Sunday Vespers in the LOTH is more or less Monastic Vespers spread over 4 weeks with a canticle added. The only missing Sunday psalm from Monastic Vespers is 112 which in any event turns up at 1st Vespers.

    I like to look at the glass as half-full, and the LOTH with the new Gregorian chant books has been looking better and better to me every day.

    For those who want a fuller post-Vatican II experience, there's always one of the licit monastic variants:

    Schema A, the original Benedictine schema with the option of retaining Prime or redistributing its psalms;

    Schema B, as used in our abbey, all 150 psalms (no censorship!) in a week

    Schemas C and D, two different two-weeks psalters.

    Personally the ability to chant the LOTH has been a huge gift for me. I pray the entire daytime hours in Gregorian chant, in Latin. I do Vigils/Office of Readings recto-tono in French by anticipation the previous evening. When I have time, I do Terce and None too using the (very traditional in the monastic tradition) Gradual psalms. As an active retiree, the flexibility of this office has been a godsend to me. A handful of fellow oblates do as I do as well. I also know more and more of the laity praying the LOTH though few chant it.

    I find your comment about Terce and Sext odd. The Monastic psalter always had the same psalms as the LOTH for Terce and Sext from Tuesday to Saturday, and often abbeys pray those hours just before Mass.

    In fact in many ways the LOTH owes at least as much to the 1500 y.o. monastic tradition (using some of the licit options) than the 116 y.o. psalter of Pius X, excluding of course the spreading of the psalter over 4 weeks. Is it a perfect Office? Not by any means (I for one don't like the NT canticle at Vespers because they don't flow nicely when like the psalms when chanted, they are only "canticles" because someone said they are, not because they really are!), but they all have their shortcomings for actual daily use by a Oblate or any other layperson.

    Ora
    Thanked by 1Vilyanor
  • MatthewRoth
    Posts: 2,315
    Why is it odd? It was a comment that was not particularly related to what I wrote directly to you. The point is that if it’s so short in the older Roman use (even if, sadly, the psalms change in the Pian scheme), then it’s pathetic that it isn’t done regularly in its LOTH form. I was speaking of parish settings. Private devotion trumps, and the office is just for the priest.

    OK, once a month. That’s still depressing to me.
  • I pray the entire daytime hours in Gregorian chant, in Latin.

    Sounds awesome—what book(s) do you use? I wish I had time for such an endeavor!
  • a_f_hawkins
    Posts: 3,471
    @MatthewRoth I don't understand why you think the office is just for the priest, it is of obligation for many religious, and lay members of other bodies such as the third orders. Our very small parish had lay led Morning Prayer about half an hour before Mass for many years, typically half a dozen people compared with a Sunday (including anticipated) attendance of 200.
    Thanked by 1CHGiffen
  • MatthewRoth
    Posts: 2,315
    I didn’t say it was. The point is that for all intents and purposes it is prayed privately by a select few. It’s about the attitude fostered, not about the reality that it is a part of the public worship of the church which ought to be offered solemnly as often as possible.
  • tomjaw
    Posts: 2,782
    I find it rather interesting that the "public worship of the Church" has so many forms and options that each parish can have their own version.

    From reading the above posts, would I be correct to assume that the public celebration of the LOTH in Latin is almost non-existent?
    Would it also be fair to suggest that the public celebration of the Divine Office (EF) is more commonly celebrated than the LOTH in Latin?

    I am tempted to suggest that if Rome wanted to destroy the musical heritage (Divine Office) of the Church they could not have found a better way than their interference over the last 100 years.

    N.B. With my L.U. or Roman Antiphonal / Vesperale (EF) I can go almost anywhere in the world and participate in the Sung Divine Office (According to the Roman Books post 1914) But I have no easy way of doing the same with the LOTH... Amazing!
  • MatthewRoth
    Posts: 2,315
    I understand that the London Oratory has always substituted the Magnificat antiphons and has historically retained the 1967 ritual, but they use the older psalter. Other Oratories and churches do straight 1962.

    Even if Sung Vespers is harder on ferial days according to the older form, I stil think it is easier than the newer form, given that the OCO is newly revised and the AR has been taking years to complete.
    Thanked by 1BruceL
  • tomjaw
    Posts: 2,782
    I have not been to Vespers at the London Oratory, but have been to Tenebrae and that is more or less to 1962 Rubrics, Lessons in English sadly, (Lamentations sung in Latin), Plenty of Polyphonic settings!

    Having seen the music program with polyphonic settings of the Hymn / Mag. etc. I would assume that they would have to be doing something similar to 1962, the photographs of the Ceremonies also suggest EF Rubrics.
  • MatthewRoth
    Posts: 2,315
    Yes, I’ve not made it to Vespers, only repeating what I’ve heard. But I agree: more places seem to do the older Latin office than the newer. St. Agnes in St. Paul MN is historically known for the traditional choral ordinaries and celebrating the Pauline Mass in the spirit of continuity, but they do the office according to the L.U. That tells me something about the LOTH.
  • rarty
    Posts: 96
    Somewhat off-topic, but there will be a new resource available soon for EF/1962 Vespers that will make ferial days much easier for amateur/secular choirs.
  • OraLabora
    Posts: 218
    @ CorAnglais16:

    I use Les Heures Grégoriennes mainly, but also Antiphonale Romanum II (published by Solesmes in 2010), the latter mainly because it has a broader selection of Gospel Canticle antiphons on Sundays. LHG repeats the same antiphon at I and II Vespers and Lauds. AR II has a different one at I Vespers, which in the monastic cursus is also the same one used at Lauds.

    There are now at least 3 oblates of our monastery using LHG and AR II to sing the LOTH daily (privately). We're spread out geographically but it would be fun to get together from time to time.

    It's really not that time consuming; I managed it easily when still working (retired now), but it's much easier with the LOTH than the EF or Monastic schemas! I get most of the psalms in 4 weeks (except those omitted or seasonal), whereas with the monastic (and it would be the same for me with the EF), there would be psalms I would *always* miss week after week because of Offices that interfered with my work schedule.
    Thanked by 1CorAnglais16
  • Somewhat off-topic, but there will be a new resource available soon for EF/1962 Vespers that will make ferial days much easier for amateur/secular choirs.


    image
    Thanked by 1Jahaza
  • @MatthewRoss

    OK, once a month. That’s still depressing to me.


    That's more than it ever appeared in the Monastic Office. The Tonus Peregrinus wasn't used on Sundays of Monastic Vespers. And that's a 1500 y.o. tradition that pre-dates Trent by some 1000 years. In the monastic world, Ps. 113 which used that tone, showed up on Monday, not Sunday.
    Thanked by 1MarkThompson