The songs children need
  • Kathy
    Posts: 5,509
    One of the reasons Europe is secularized is that religion is seen as something for children. Sacraments are stepping stones to adulthood rather than faith. By university, belief in God is set aside as firmly as American children outgrow Santa Claus.

    The way to keep this unspeakable tragedy from occurring is to give children grownup religious food from an early age.

    There is no reason why children should learn "cute" songs (with or without hand motions). This is utterly counterproductive. Soon they will think this music is silly. Ever go to a school Mass where they sing This Little Light of Mine? The 4th graders are shuffling their feet in embarrassment. Some of them are beginning to wonder whether this religion has anything to offer.

    It is bad motivational practice to dumb things down. It is part of our faith that people can rise above themselves. When this opportunity is given to children, pretty soon, they will soar.
  • I agree and I disagree.

    I still remember my daughters singing Wunderkerze (a secular song) with their entire Grundschule with sparklers in their hands for Weihnachtszeit when I lived in Germany. As well as Stille Nacht, and Dreidel Dreidel Dreidel.

    Dumb songs like "This Little Light of Mine" (agreed, dumb), or "Father Abraham - right arm, left arm, right leg, left leg, chin up, etc.) are NOT responsible for the secularization of society.

    The way to keep this unspeakable tragedy from occurring is to be vigilant, pray, and ensure WE are not living in some sort of bubble, where we are ignorant of the secular ideas out there. So when Anna goes to college it is not her first exposure to different and enticing ideas she has never heard before.

    I'm all for striking stupid music from our world, but I think that's a different subject.
    Thanked by 1Gavin
  • Mark HuseyMark Husey
    Posts: 192
    I tried doing "Who did swallow Jonah" (Whale did) for a school sing about 5 years ago. These kids looked up at me as if I had grown a second head. They'd been singing some Rutter and some other "intro to real music" music for about a year and this simply wouldn't do. Once you've introduced scholarly music to children, they will look askance at anything tawdry or infantile. That doesn't mean we don't do blended repertory, but what contemporary American Catholic repertory we do sing, we sing with proper declamation and vocal technique.

    My trebles (grades 3 - 6) are singing complete movements of Vierne's Messe Solennelle this weekend for Laetare Sunday. They were practically dancing to the Sanctus at our last rehearsal, the rhythm was so infectious. Did that make it any less holy (in a rehearsal setting)? Certainly not for me. They simply could not contain their joy. We also let them know that at Mass, they have to keep those dance movements in their head so we can place appropriate attention on the sacrifice at the altar. And Father doesn't dance.

    Deo Gratias.
  • Kathy is doubly spot on! I think that the craze for teaching children 'children's songs' is that their teachers know nothing else themselves. And, these teachers have a very sad concept of what the young mind is capable of. All they are teaching is all that they themselves, in their ignorance, know. Such 'teachers' have no business teaching anything to young minds.

    I do not recall learning any such children's music when I was little. What music I heard I disregarded totally... until I began piano very early... and then heard Mozart symphonies... then I took music seriously. Look at the children's section of The Hymnal 1940. These are serious texts set to serious tunes, the sort of 'children's songs' that I was taught, and that generations upon generations before me were taught. Have you ever taken serious note of the vocabulary, grammar and syntax of 'Once in Royal David's City'? This was written for children! Out of pure childish curiosity I taught myself how to make sense of Anglican chant pointing while it was being sung at church. I took note of strange words, thought they were very special, and had great fun learning to use them.

    It is our teachers who make childish idiots out of our children. Kathy is right! They should be taught adult fare. This would do wonders for their literacy. I am astonished that modern children cannot comprehend the vocabulary of a normal hymn, vocabulary that I and generations joyfully deciphered and delighted in. Oh, what fun we had with the language of Coverdale's psalter!

    Knowing 'adult' fare, whether it is music, biblical fare, or theology, would go far to preparing our youth for the intellectual challenges they will have as they mature. The real children are children's teachers.
  • Kathy
    Posts: 5,509
    SeasonPsalt,

    I think you nailed it when you said that you remember your daughters singing.

    My question is not about what pleases parents, but what is good for the growing souls of children.
    Thanked by 2CHGiffen tomjaw
  • My question is not about what pleases parents, but what is good for the growing souls of children.


    ...and this statement may be true.

    But I disagree having children sing "grownup religious songs" will do anything to stop the march of securalization. Just like having children memorize the Baltimore Catechism will not stop the march of securalization.

    While both ARE good things to do, they will not even hinder the march of securalization.

    Which was my point.
    Thanked by 1Gavin
  • Kathy
    Posts: 5,509
    Really? Why do you think so?
  • Because I've seen it.

    I've seen what happens to young sheltered Catholic youth who grew up singing in Latin. Many are leaving the Church in droves.

    It has nothing to do with silly songs, (though they don't help if nothing else is offered.)

    Our adversary is wily, roaming to and fro seeking people to devour.

    There are many good resources to defend against secularization here (USCCB):

    http://www.usccb.org/beliefs-and-teachings/how-we-teach/new-evangelization/

    And there is a good article on the Family by Cardinal William J. Levada (2006) which DOES address ways to defend against creeping secularization in Catholic families using the new Catechism.

    http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20060707_levada-valencia_en.html

    But too often the basic cell of Church life, the parish, has not yet responded effectively to assist families live out their high vocation in the midst of an increasingly secularized world. The Catechism and the new Compendium lend themselves as tools that can bring families together to help each other deepen their understanding of the faith, to realize the ideals contained in the virtues as a way of living “in Christ,” and to challenge each other to live out their Christian faith in love with a truly apostolic, missionary spirit.


    Thanked by 1Gavin
  • I guess what I'm trying to say are dumb silly fluff songs for children are more a symptom than a cause.
  • Kathy
    Posts: 5,509
    I've seen the opposite. Can you say more about your vantage point? How have you seen large numbers of young people raised singing in Latin? How have you seen them leaving the Church in droves?
  • BenBen
    Posts: 3,114
    I've also seen many people leave the church who have been raised singing latin.

    After the latin left, so did they.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ssnw2GA657s
    Thanked by 1tomjaw
  • Now we'd have get into personal experiences that involve people I grew up with, and people I know now.- including my best friend from grade school, his father really active with the Salesians, and now he is Bhuddist). A young agnostic/sort of neo-Bhuddist/maybe sort of atheist who left the Church and sets herself up to judge God. Very fluent in Latin, she is.
    I can give more examples but it would be difficult without rambling and divulging personally identifiable information without their consent.

    Is it Latin that keeps the Church the Church?

    Maybe Saint Ignatius of Antioch might have said heresies might enter the Church if they stop using Greek? [note- To my knowledge he did NOT say this, but I don't know what the Eastern Orthodox may say on the subject.]

    So corny kiddie songs are the cause of "this unspeakable tragedy?"

    Really?
    Thanked by 1Gavin
  • Kathy
    Posts: 5,509
    Perhaps I am missing the connection. Were your friends trained in sacred music as children?
  • Were your friends trained in sacred music as children


    YES.

    While I mumbled along and got "most" of the words right, they KNEW the in Latin chants. I'll bet they still do.

    They left the Church for other reasons.

    I don't disagree with you that we could use less dumb, silly fluff for children, but still that is more a symptom than a cause.

    I just disagree that getting rid of the fluff and replacing it with good music will have any affect on the source issue.

    Though, PLEASE- if it's within your power in your corner of the world do get rid of the silly, in some cases almost sacrilegious junk. But not because it will change secularization, but because it's the right thing to do.

    I mean, really we seem to be disagreeing but we really do share some of the same goals here.
    Thanked by 2Kathy Gavin
  • JulieCollJulieColl
    Posts: 2,465
    I've seen what happens to young sheltered Catholic youth who grew up singing in Latin. Many are leaving the Church in droves.


    While I don't dispute that you've seen this happen, SeasonPsalt, there are no doubt many other factors involved. Were they regularly singing the Mass in Latin, that is, the ordinary, antiphons and hymns at a sung High Mass, or just a few random hymns in Latin at a mostly silent Low Mass?

    There is a big difference, I believe. If young children are taught to sing the Mass, they will become deeply invested in it. I see it happening at our Latin Mass over the last five years and, while I cannot predict if our children will always retain the faith, at least they will have a large reservoir of Gregorian chant and sacred hymnody stored up in their memory banks, and I'd be willing to bet good money that this rich and profound liturgical experience will help sustain their faith in later life.

    The video at the link below (you have to scroll down a bit on the page to access the video) shows, I believe, the ultimate realization of the goals of the original Liturgical Movement: a children's schola leading the congregation in singing the Ordinary of the Mass and singing the propers at the Mass with a minimum of adult direction. In fact, one of the young boys leads the schola during parts of the Mass. What is so astounding is how completely comfortable and at ease they are with the chants of the Graduale Romanum.

    Of course, this is a congregation of SSPX France, and I think it's without question that the Catholic French traditionalists have a very strong and vibrant Catholic culture, probably the strongest in the world. If this is how they train their children to sing the Mass, maybe they're on to something?

    http://laportelatine.org/mediatheque/videotheque/cacqueray_villepreux_131012_et_13/messe_et_consecration_villepreux_131013.php

    Thanked by 1bonniebede
  • bonniebede
    Posts: 756
    I think you guys are talking something at cross purposes. I think the connections stack up like this.
    Adults without a deep living relationship to Jesus - try to engage young people in 'religion' - so they try to compete with what else occupies kids, which is mostly entertainment - so they try to make the religion entertaining - which may entertain for a while but does not communicate a deep living relationship with Jesus - so the kids are vulnerable to being caught by the world- and they are - and so they ditch the 'religion'.
    In this scenario it really makes little difference if the 'religious entertainment' component is silly songs or latin chants, though, given that chant is richer humanly speaking than this little light of mine, I would be surprised if it did not outlast the silly songs for a while....BUT... nothing can take the place of a deep living relationship with Jesus.
    However, if adults with a deep living relationship with Jesus truly seek to pass on their love of the Lord, using music, then something wonderful happens, the kids get it (sometimes, allowing for free will) and begin to do battle manfully with the world and its temptations.
    I know parents who have done this successfully using Latin Mass and chant, and others who have done it using the resources of charismatic renewal, including songs that I suspect many here would sniff at.
    Yes, I believe in being committed to helping our church promote the best and richest musical resources, but only in the context of communicating the real purposes for God.
    Art for Arts sake, in this context, is more than futile, it is nearly heretical! (okay that last sentence was a bit polemical, I get all the truth is beauty and beauty truth and stuff, I just saying we have to be keeping it real, you know? ;-)
  • Mark HuseyMark Husey
    Posts: 192
    Kids are only as limited as their teachers are.
  • chonakchonak
    Posts: 9,216
    Figuring out what factors are important in young people's departures from the Church requires some research. My guess is that the example of fathers, attending or not, is probably influential. Mom, even traddie Mom teaching the kids Latin hymns, can't pass on the faith by herself.
    Thanked by 2canadash Gavin
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,980
    Kids are interesting creatures with a gift for seeing through insincerity, drama, and a lack of general belief. They have pretty good judgments on music, as well. I recently saw a local guitar guru performing his top 70s Catholic hits. The middle-schoolers laughed openly at him and referred to him as an old hippie. Kids easily recognize the differences between the genuinely sacred and the secular. I wouldn't insult them with campfire songs - they likely wouldn't appreciate it.
    Thanked by 1Gavin
  • doneill
    Posts: 207
    The kids at the Cathedral of the Madeleine in Salt Lake sing great sacred music consistently. They also listen to the most ridiculous pop songs on their own time. Nothing wrong with that, but they know what belongs in church and what doesn't
  • canadashcanadash
    Posts: 1,501
    I think a big problem is that married couples don't live out the teachings of the church. The teachings are difficult to live out fully. I don't think it is lost on kids that mom and dad go to church and know the prayers, but use ABC, condone living together (maybe even did it themselves), skip church when inconvenient, drink to excess, make unwise choices with regard to movies and books....and we can go on. The faith has to be lived out in full for the child to embrace the faith. Liturgy is one aspect of a huge puzzle.
  • Kathy
    Posts: 5,509
    My thesis is not that children's Gregorian scholastic will change the world. Much as I think it would and would like to try.

    The thesis here is that planned obsolescence is a wickedly effective strategy.
  • GavinGavin
    Posts: 2,799
    The thesis here is that planned obsolescence is a wickedly effective strategy.


    I think this is a sound and profoundly wise statement.

    I also agree with SeasonPsalt that the more hyperbolic statements being thrown around are incorrect. The plural of anecdote is data, and I, too, have "data" about Traddie sorts and how they become hypocrites, apostates, and/or socially low-functioning individuals of all sorts. However, I'm not going to label everyone taught Salve Regina at a young age negatively, as I realize my own experiences are from self-selection (as a hypocritical, apostate, socially low-functioning individual, myself). Trads have good and bad, "neo-caths" have good and bad; I'll say that at least the trads tend to keep the faith. Or at least have a faith worth keeping.

    In my experience (again, more "data"), I find there IS a need for age-appropriate catechesis. I've gotten a lot of blank stares from 10 year olds while droning on about chant and Latin or Bible stories. I've also had a lot of eyes light up when doing simple chant hymns with drones.

    The idea of giving children something they can inwardly digest (if my Anglicanism is showing...) is a sound one, I believe. However, there has to be substance to it. The substance is where much modern children's catechesis (musical or otherwise) is lacking. And absolutely wean them into adulthood. In my personal life, I now find myself in the position of cooking for children. I quickly found that no matter how I season my soups or dress my pasta, they will not eat it. But I can do better than fast food every night by meeting them where they're at, and challenging them to take in more and more adult food.

    All of which is quibbling. Kathy is spot on - the children's formation of today is consciously focused on making believing children. It needs to be consciously focused on making believing adults.
    Thanked by 1melofluent
  • kevinfkevinf
    Posts: 1,191
    My experience reflects Kathy. I also believe that giving children appropriate roles within the liturgy and giving them responsibility helps them "contribute" and thus gives them ownership. Case in point, a person who has been singing for me a couple of years as a child is now a teenager. he openly said to the bishop that doing what he has done (singing in choir, cantoring at school masses,etc) has him thinking about a vocation. He said to me that I gave him a chance to contribute to the prayer helped him see his place in it.

    Give them good music and help them to own it for themselves. That will give us hope... which is what we are about anyway.