Beauty Has Vanished
  • dad29
    Posts: 2,232
    We all know that Benedict XVI mentioned the need for beauty in the Mass several times. But he's not the only one who mentions beauty. This essayist approaches it, too, and has a http://www.everyjoe.com/2014/07/03/politics/robbed-of-beauty-by-the-left/.

    "...The most precious, profound and important of the great ideas which the Left has raped from us is beauty. I need spend no time on the proposition that life without beauty is a nightmare: those who have seen true beauty – sublime beauty, if even for a moment – have nothing to which they can liken it except the ecstasies of mystics and the transports of saints. Beauty consoles the sorrowing; beauty brings joy and deepens understanding; beauty is like food and wine, and men who live surrounded by ugliness become shriveled and starved in their souls.

    Why, if beauty is so important, is there no discussion of it? The victory of the Left in this area has been so sudden, so remarkable, and so complete, that the discussion of beauty has lapsed into an utter and a desolate silence. Have you, dear reader, read anything discussing beauty, putting forth a coherent theory of beauty, or even extolling beauty’s central importance of the human soul in a year? In 10 years? Ever?"


    Well, yes. Benedict XVI. But then, Mr. Wright doesn't read his stuff. Nonetheless, we go on, because this is where the fun starts!!

    "...There is no discussion of it because by convincing the public that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, the Left has placed it beyond the realm of discussion. According to the Left, beauty is a matter of taste, and arbitrary taste at that. There is no discussion of taste because to give reasons to prefer tasteful to tasteless things is elitist, nasty, uncouth and inappropriate. To have taste implies that some cultures produce more works of art and better than others, and this raises the uncomfortable possibility that love of beauty is Eurocentric, or even racist. To admire beauty has become a hate crime.

    "...If beauty is in the eye of the beholder, then there is no such thing as training the taste. One can sit down and watch well done popular entertainment – for example, a Mickey Mouse cartoon – with pleasure and enjoyment, and no study is needed to prepare you to appreciate and understand it. But to sit down and read Milton’s Paradise Lost for pleasure, one needs a passing familiarity with classical and Biblical figures to which he alludes, and one’s pleasure is increased if one is familiar with the epic models, the Virgil and Homer, on whose themes Milton plays out so creative and striking a variation."


    Ah, yes. Training the taste. "Pops" (gebrauchtmusik)--yah, we do that in church. It's what the PIPs want, ain'a?

    "...John Williams’ theme music of Star Wars will do in lieu of Elgar, Wagner or Holst. But all these popular entertainments serve to entertain, not to ravish.

    "Popular art serves the appetites and passions. Even if some serve noble appetites and passion, popular works are not meant to do what a true work of art does, which involves forgetting the appetites and passions. It is for this reason that a classical statue of a nude is not like a Playboy centerfold. One is selfish, as lust is selfish, and uses the other as an instrument; the other is selfless, as love is selfless.

    "At any point before World War One, if you asked any philosopher or intellectual what was the point of art, poetry, music, painting, sculpture, architecture, all of them of each generation all the way back to Socrates would have said the purpose of art is to seek beauty. Socrates himself would have said that by beauty, by the strong love and longing created in the human breast at the sight of something sublime, we are drawn out of ourselves, and are carried step by step away from the mundane to the divine.

    "The strongest argument against the atheism so beloved of the Left is not an argument that can be put in words, for it is the argument of beauty. If you see a sunset clothed in scarlet like a king descending to his empurpled pyre, or wonder at the gleaming thunder of a waterfall, if you find yourself fascinated by the soft intricacy of a crimson rose or behold the cold virgin majesty of the morning star, much less see and enter a cathedral or a walled garden, or you hear Schiller’s “Ode to Joy” by Beethoven or see the David of Michelangelo, or become immersed into the song and splendor and Northern sorrow of Wagner’s “Ring” or Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings, if indeed you see real beauty and for a moment you forget yourself, then you are drawn out of yourself into something larger.

    "In that timeless moment of sublime rapture, the heart knows even if the head cannot put it into words that the dull and quotidian world of betrayal, pain, disappointment and sorrow is not the only world there is. Beauty points to a world beyond this world, a higher realm, a country of joy where there is no death. Beauty points to the divine."


    B-16 said it more elegantly, but this formulation is dead-on, too.

    Whither the Faith? Following beauty out the door.
  • WendiWendi
    Posts: 638
    I found the beauty...it is currently in Indianapolis. :)
    Thanked by 1melofluent
  • francis
    Posts: 10,825
    Amen. Beauty is an objective truth.
    Thanked by 1kenstb
  • dad29
    Posts: 2,232
    Francis, this tails into your series of postings regarding the EF/OF dissonance.

    It's probably true that both EF and OF celebrations utilized utility-music unless Chant propers and Ordinaries were used extensively. But the prevalence of 'beauty' in the EF's forms and rituals vis-a-vis the prevalence of 'utility' in the OF (as most often celebrated) makes this essay's content more interesting,

    When the author writes: "[p]opular art serves the appetites and passions" it hits home to those of us subject to a weekly mega-dose of re-tooled Broadway melody and harmony presented as "hymnody."

    Finally, when the author indicts 'atheist Leftists' for this disappearance of beauty, it certainly should ring alarm bells about the true nature (and intent) of the Bugnini Gang and their ragtag rabble of cymbal-clangers in the US "liturgical music" industry.
  • francis
    Posts: 10,825
    dad29:

    I am now attending the Spanish Mass instead of having to bear the pain of the NO here in town. The Spanish music is at least simple and not trying to put on a show.

    Broadway is at least artistic, musical and well done. But no professional broadway musician would dare participate in the shenanigans that is put on in our churches, be assured. What happens in most catholic churches is laughable at best and would get a yanking shepherds crook around its neck within seconds of any attempted performance anywhere else.

    I often watch the faces of the congregation who seem to be in a stupor punching the time card for attendance. God, please deliver us from evil.
  • Richard MixRichard Mix
    Posts: 2,799
    I hate to pick on a fellow Wagnerite, but putting Milton and Tolkien in the same category hardly seems like a way to demonstrate an absolute...
  • dad29
    Posts: 2,232
    Yah, well, it's not my personal essay. For that matter, the piece kinda favors Romantic composers and ignores everything else.

    That's not the point, of course.
  • Richard MixRichard Mix
    Posts: 2,799
    If there is one ;-)

    Is the point of the essay's bizarre thought experiment that 1. Leftists can be defined as people who finds slums desirable, or 2. People whose tastes are congruent with Albert Speer's are statistically more likely to be ACLU supporters?
  • dad29
    Posts: 2,232
    I think you can figure it out.