But Adam Bartlett's Lumen Christi Missal, which is a pew resource, prints both the Gradual and Roman Missal proper texts. That book was published in 2012. So how can that claim be accurate?
I presume that your remarks refer to the link posted at 8:24 a.m. by Bob_Nardo. That link was to an original instrumental part for Tony Alonso’s new tune. That entire page is copyright by GIA Publications. Nothing on this page is copyright by Hope. So, your conclusions that GIA failed to provide proper copyright attribution are mistaken.GIA has failed to list the original copyright holder's information. While this by itself could be considered an original composition, the fact that it is based upon the harmonies and melody combined that appear to be copyright by another firm would indicate that this is a violation of copyright and the original owner would need to grant permission.
Again, you are mistaken in asserting that GIA failed to provide attribution to another publisher. The example in CCW’s video is taken from the pew book of Worship IV, and the copyright notice at the bottom of the hymnal's page states that the hymn is copyright by Hope Publishing Company.So, it is clear that on a basic copyright search, CCW could easily have identified the copyright holder as GIA due to GIA's failure to provide attribution to another publisher and instead claiming copyright.
There was no erroneous information from GIA.It's forgivable for a small, independent publishing house without a legal office to search copyrights to err when the erroneous information comes from major publishers who claim copyright as GIA did here.
As proven in my above comments, GIA attributed to Hope Publishing Company that what is theirs, and did not drop the copyright ball.GIA was responsible to list the copyright owner of the melody for this derivative work. They dropped the copyright ball, not CCW.
One of the hymns shown in the video during this narration is "Touch the Earth Lightly," a very fine hymn about our responsibility to use God's gift of creation wisely. The graphic states that the hymn is copyright by GIA Publications. It is not. Both the text and tune are copyright by Hope Publishing Company.
But Adam Bartlett's Lumen Christi Missal, which is a pew resource, prints both the Gradual and Roman Missal proper texts. That book was published in 2012. So how can that claim be accurate?
The Lumen Christi Missal does not include any graduals, tracts, or greater alleluia chants, which are a very important part of the Church's liturgy! So I think that this new Hymnal's claim is quite accurate.
sending a private note to Jeff O mentioning a possible problem.
So, this new book pretty much has the content of the "old" Vatican II Hymnal
Lumen Christi is more "plain"
Jogues... just one Mass setting
To participate in the discussions on Catholic church music, sign in or register as a forum member, The forum is a project of the Church Music Association of America.