Mozartean effect (or 'affekt') -
  • This isn't, but in the most strainedly tangential and oblique manner, about liturgy; but, it does perhaps illuminate effective and affective aspects of real music upon creation, and, by implication, liturgy. Contained in a recent BBC magazine dedicated to God's servant, Mozart, are the following tid-bits about his music's influence upon the receivers of its vibrations:

    1. A wine grower in France discoverd that grapes to which Mozart was played regularly ripen in 14, as opposed to 20, days. Among the benefits are increased alcoholic content and flavour.

    2. An experimenter (I forget where from) discovered that water that had had Mozart played to it had clearer crystals when frozen than that which had had the misfortune of having had rock played to it.

    3. A Spanish dairy farmer found that cows who had Mozart played to them produced up to 6 litres more milk per animal than those who had not been so blessed.

    4. In 2006 the RSPCE centre in Somerset reported that dogs who had Mozart played for them were far more relaxed than those who had been mistreated with pop music.

    5. A researcher (I forget where from) found that mice who had Mozart played for them negotiated labyrinths more quickly than their Mozart-deprived brethren; and, that mice who were so unfortunate as to have rock music played for them attacked one another.

    6. In 2004 Greek athletes who had incorporated 15 minutes of Mozart into their daily training regimen brought home 6 gold medals, more than they had since 1895.

    7. Somewhere (I don't remember where), hearing Mozart's music resulted in faster growing premature babies (also, faster growing fish).

    8. Pigs lulled to sleep with Mozart on their last night of life produced less epinephrine, and, therefore, were far tastier.

    9. A certain (I don't remember which) German sewage centre saves around 1000 Euros a month by playing Mozart throughout the plant. It apparently accelerates the break-down of bio-mass.

    10. Trinity University in Texas reports that plants photosynthesise more quickly when listening to Mozart. Rock music, in particular, has gravely adverse effects on the unfortunate flora.

    11. Last, I read several years ago that stores which played classical music over their PA systems reaped considerable increase in sales. It seems that classical music makes people feel good about themselves and their environment, which results in greater pleasure in making purchases. (I can only say that I neither purchase nor linger where unfortunate music is heard.)
    Thanked by 2CHGiffen JulieColl
  • chonakchonak
    Posts: 9,216
    Conversely, music by Britney Spears is used to repel Somali pirates on the high seas.
  • JulieCollJulieColl
    Posts: 2,465
    Rock music is used as a weapon by the U.S. Army and is used to torture prisoners.
  • Adam WoodAdam Wood
    Posts: 6,482
    All these Mozart-effect "studies" need to expand their horizons.
    It's obvious that good music is better than no music, and WAY better than bad music.
    What I want to know is: Is Mozart better than Bach? Is polyphony better than chant? Is instrumental music better than unaccompanied? And does it matter whether your intervals are tuned perfectly or not?
  • Unless you can actually read the studies, there seem to be about a billion variables in every one of these. The effects might have nothing to do with Mozart at all.
  • I seem to recall that when MythBusters tested this (edit: ah yes, in 2004), music did appear to improve the growth of plants, but the plants that had hard-core death metal music played to them grew best of all.
  • Adam WoodAdam Wood
    Posts: 6,482
    Also, re: plant growth...

    It really has to be a double-blind study, doesn't it? I mean- it really isn't fair if the researchers and plant care-takers know which bushes are getting which music.
    Thanked by 1Andrew Motyka
  • Richard MixRichard Mix
    Posts: 2,798
    To the contrary, I've often observed the faces of saints in my pancakes frown if I'm listening to Viennese concerted masses while cooking, while they tend to smile if I chant.

    </font color=deadpan
    Thanked by 1CHGiffen
  • I do suspect that similar results would occur in response to the music of Vivaldi, Bach, and many others. The fact that trashy rock music is known to have very negative psychic effects on animals and 'enemies' speaks for itself. Whenever I am so unfortunate as to be in ear shot of it I flee as though from the plague.

    I was aware that, as Adam suggests, some of these tests may not altogether pass scientific muster. Still, they do suggest a pattern, are fun to quote, and would seem to be consistent with the experiential musical lives of many of us on this forum. Some music has great moral, spiritual and intellectual value. Some other music is not psychologically and spiritually harmless. An informed conscience and clean intellect will discern this rather quickly.
  • melofluentmelofluent
    Posts: 4,160
    From what we frequently mention, we might benefit from the Cage Effect (4:33) at more moments during liturgies.
    Thanked by 3Adam Wood CHGiffen JL
  • Adam WoodAdam Wood
    Posts: 6,482
    I'm a little poking fun and a little serious. I really wish someone who do serious research in this area. While I think the anecdotal and pseudo-scientific evidence is compelling, it's too east to dismiss any conclusions that don't simply support a pre-existing worldview.
    Thanked by 1JL
  • Richard MixRichard Mix
    Posts: 2,798
    I'm a little poking fun and a little serious... the anecdotal and pseudo-scientific evidence is compelling...

    Not even a little, I can't help suspecting.
  • ryandryand
    Posts: 1,640
    Mozart effect has been disproven over and over. Counter-studies are abundant about how its all made up, but simply looking at the first point of this thread, consider: If the acoustic resonance of his compositions can really influence the chemical concentration of alcohol in fermented grapes, then it would be logical to assume that his music, having the capacity to influence natural developments, was written exclusively in the Lydian dominant mode, based on the naturally occurring overtones instead of arbitrary adjustments (the "natural" 4 or 7, which allow for the accepted European harmonic sequences praised in academia), and that, somehow, the ongoing debate and struggle of tuning temperaments was resolved in the magical recording that the grapes were blessed to hear.



    I grew up on classic rock, went through high school on thrash metal, community college on jazz fusion, and ended grad school playing top 40 songs with an acoustic trio.

    And I still became a proponent of sacred music.
    image.jpg
    300 x 300 - 30K
  • Adam WoodAdam Wood
    Posts: 6,482
    There was a study done (this story would be more interesting with more details...) in which researchers measured the efficiency of factory workers in various lighting conditions.

    Researchers dimmed the lights... productivity improved.
    Back to normal... productivity back to normal.

    You might conclude that dimmer lights is better for productivity.

    But then they brightened the lights... and productivity improved again.

    This has (I understand) been replicated elsewhere.

    The conclusion (which is apparently accepted widely enough to be a part of several introductory Psych text books) was that simply paying more attention to workers made them more productive.

    I can't help but think there is a similar mechanism at work in the so-called "Mozart Effect."

    Rational Wiki, whose opinion I respect on all things except politics and religion, seems to think it is stupid.

    I think that the original research was done poorly, and with a bias. I also think that follow-up (debunking) research was done poorly and with a bias. So, for me, you can't say either way is a "true fact."

    Personally, if I had to listen to Mozart all day, I think I'd go out of my mind.

    I am most productive while listening to loud Irish folk-rock.
  • Another story regarding the effect of music upon people. Some time ago (I’ll estimate about 15 years), homeless people were congregating adjacent to the Port Authority Bus Terminal in New York City where they set up their makeshift street shelters. City officials were perplexed and not sure what to do. For some reason, the terminal management started playing classical music over the facility’s loud speaker system. The homeless people packed up and left for other areas, apparently finding the music annoying. Since this is one key point of entry into the city for tourists, commuters and visiting business people, city officials were relived.

    Please note that I’m not inferring this is a solution to the problem of homelessness, which we Christians have a moral obligation to address. I’m just offering it as an example of how one group in a particular place reacted to a type of music at one point in time.
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,979
    When I was teaching school, miscreants sometimes lost recess time and had to stay with me. Did I mention that I love Wagner and at higher volume? Most never acted up again, and as one young genius remarked, "I am never going back in there again!"
    Thanked by 2JulieColl Spriggo
  • Richard MixRichard Mix
    Posts: 2,798
    ...people packed up and left for other areas, apparently finding the music annoying.

    Isn't this how everyone understands the organ voluntary after the recessional anyway?
  • CharlesW- fantastic!!
  • melofluentmelofluent
    Posts: 4,160
    Did I mention that I love Wagner and at higher volume?
    And do you love the smell of napalm in the morning, as it smells of victory?
    Charlie don't surf!
  • francis
    Posts: 10,824
    Charles

    Wagner has the same effect on me. So does Mozart.
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,979
    Victory is always good! I could have played Bach for them, but I only wanted to punish them. Not drive them insane. LOL.