Advice on acquiring a new organ
  • Hello. My church, St. John the Evangelist in Center City Philadelphia, has been without an organ for 38 years (organ music even longer) and we're very interested in acquiring a "new" one. We're in the early stages of conducting our search, but we're hindered by the biggest obstacle of any new acquisition: money! We'd really like to replace something very similar to our 3rd organ that was lost in a 1903 fire, the 1899 H&H Opus 1842. I've been to quite a few organ restoration shops online, but selection usually isn't great. Does anyone have any recommendations for a good site or restorer?

    Also, we've begun a pledge drive for our next organ, whatever it may be, but have been told that is a very iffy prospect. Can any one here offer any advice on how they raised the funds to acquire a "new" organ for their parish? Did you seek out one large donor, get a grant, etc?

    Any and all advice would be appreciated.

    Thanks,
    Blitz
  • Mostly I've played in churches which had already possessed an organ for decades. The only church in my experience which actually acquired an unfamiliar organ, during my tenure, paid for part of its cost via instigating special collections.

    It really depends a good deal on the size of the congregation, the wealth of the congregation, and the willingness or otherwise of the congregation to subsidize such an expenditure. This particular congregation was fairly small, but in a cashed-up suburb.

    Also - and I fully expect to be shot down in flames by certain purists for saying this - these days it would be foolish to rule out, automatically, a good digital instrument. As it happens I'm the proud owner of just such an instrument (which I use for practice purposes with a headphone socket): one of the Allen company's models from Pennsylvania.

    http://www.allenorgan.com/www/products/mainchapel.html

    These machines were a good deal less expensive eight years back, when I imported mine halfway across the world, than they are now. But perhaps they're worth considering in any case.
    Thanked by 1Blitz
  • Adam WoodAdam Wood
    Posts: 6,482
    I know of at least one forum member here who has a good deal of organ-building and organ-installation experience, and at least one other who (as MD) has overseen the fundraising and acquisition for a new pipe organ. There may be others- so you've come to the right place.
    Thanked by 1Blitz
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,982
    I have a Rodgers practice instrument in my home. Digital instruments can be useful.

    Blitz, don't forget the Organ Historical Society and their clearing house which finds new homes for orphan pipe organs.
  • kevinfkevinf
    Posts: 1,191
    Definitely check out the Organ Clearing House. They take in old instruments and sell them to new homes.

    http://www.organclearinghouse.net/

    Realize that you will need to find a builder to help you install said instrument into the church. Find a builder in your area that does rebuilds.

    Raising money can be done in a number of ways. Benefit concerts, sponsoring a pipe or rank of pipes, capital fund drives, etc.

    Good luck.
  • My only issue with organclearinghouse is that the same instruments have been displayed on on their website for about a year now.
  • redsox1
    Posts: 217
    Blitz,

    Since you're in Philadelphia, I would strongly recommend Patrick Murphy and Assoc. (www.pjmorgans.com) as someone to contact. They can give you some options. They do fabulous work (we've signed with them to restore/renovate our Casavant chapel organ) and are very pleasant to deal with. They do it all-restoration, rebuilding, relocating, and new instruments.
    Thanked by 2Blitz Nicholas_Will
  • kevinfkevinf
    Posts: 1,191
    @ClergetKubisz

    They have instruments that are not on the website. One must call them.
    Thanked by 1Blitz
  • I didnt know that. Ty
  • Digital instruments are not good stewardship. You will pay more for less quality. It's not even about music or about being a purist. It's simple economics. You lose money on them - a lot of money.
  • chonakchonak
    Posts: 9,216
    Can you explain how that happens? Do they have a markedly limited lifespan?
  • francis
    Posts: 10,828
    Get a Roland C-330 as a short term solution. Its about 10-15k and that is far better than having nothing (or a guitar)
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,982
    I think that what PGA is getting at, is that in 30 years with a digital, you have 30-year-old electronics. It may be repairable, if parts are still available. A pipe instrument can still be fixed in 100 years.
  • It won't be playing in 30 years. Our current one is a little less than 20 and unpredictably makes loud jarring noises. It sometimes doesn't work at all. If we bought another digital it would cost $75,000 to $100,000. Wait 15 years and repeat. Or spend $150,000 now for pipes that will still be playing in 100 years.
  • Adam WoodAdam Wood
    Posts: 6,482
    side rant on digital organs....

    The price of digital organs is insane, and clearly controlled by a loosely organized cabal. Keyboards aren't that expensive. Computer hardware isn't that expensive. Speakers aren't that expensive. Furniture isn't that expensive.

    For goodness sakes- a digital organ IS JUST A SYNTHESIZER! That's all it is. It has cooler twiddly knobs and extra buttons for foot-pushing. But it's a synth. It just happens to be shaped like like the console of an organ.

    I do not understand why someone (Noel?) hasn't standardized an IKEA-style, hauptwerk-powered rig that can be manufactured easily and sold for 10K or less. There is no actual, physical reason it couldn't be done for that price or less and be as good as any other digital organ.

    Kickstarter?
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,982
    When I bought my Rodgers more than a few years ago, I was convinced I paid more for the cabinetry than for the electronics. With all the oak, it weighs more than 600 pounds. I never thought that necessary for a home practice organ.
  • Thank you everyone who has replied so far. More than a week ago, I contacted online Pat Murphy and OCH. While Pat was very prompt in his reply to me, I have yet to hear back from OCH. I have't contacted Allen organs yet because we were trying to avoid digital for the very reason that has been mentioned. I have a lot of experience with analog & digital synths as well as other electronic. However, I might contact them about their hybrid organs since we're essentially building this system from the ground up again and not limited to any existing hardware.

    @Adam Wood, I will look into a kickstarter campaign, but am not sure we would qualify based on its rules.
  • Adam WoodAdam Wood
    Posts: 6,482
    blitz-
    I was thinking about Kickstarter for creating a new product, to cover initial manufacturing costs. Not for paying for a single new organ.

    You could, however, use KS for precisely that- but since your donors are likely to be local only (or otherwise friendly- not the general populace) I should think there would be less expensive fundraising systems.
    Thanked by 1Blitz
  • I don't mean to sound like a naysayer but what about maintainence costs of pipe vs digital. Those must be taken into account when comparing the total, investment by a parish. Admittedly, I do not know what the going rate is for the average pipe organ tuning, as I am not in charge of an actual pipe organ (though I am privileged to be able to play one on a regular basis). If you assume that the organ should be tuned twice per year (doesnt happen always I know), that's two hundred tunings over the life of a one hundred year instrument. That would have to be added to the cost of the organ if a 100 year life span is assumed. If you assume that a digital is around 100,000 for a new installation and would last 25-30 years, you can safely say that you'd purchase 4 in the same span as 1 pipe organ, but with no built-in maintenance costs such as tuning. You are looking at 400,000 in that case, over 100 years. With the pipe organ, you would start with the 150K and add in predicted maintenance costs over the same time span. They might add up to about the same number.
    Thanked by 1R J Stove
  • matthewjmatthewj
    Posts: 2,700
    When a church is looking at a new organ project and asking me for advice, I walk into the sanctuary and look around at the flowers and candles. Real flowers and candles = pipe organ. Fake flowers and candles = weigh the options.

    If being truly authentic in things like flowers and candles are important to a church, so should be the method of producing organ sound.
  • And all the inmates come out to play...there is no reason for any church to not consider, rationally, digital, digital and pipe, pipe electro-pneumatic action, pipe electric action or pipe tracker organs when making a decision of what will meet both the musical needs and the financial possibilities.

    Many, if not most, pipe organs are funded by one person today. Having someone with the strength of belief that the church should have a pipe organ AND the same person having the financial resources can make it possible.

    Without that person, there is a huge seesaw movement when one person (you?) wants a pipe organ but expects some other guy (the some other guy did it defense) to pay for it. In fact, a survey of the Cleveland, Ohio AGO members at one time determined that over the preceding 10 years every organist who insisted on the purchase of a pipe organ left the church either prior to or within 2 years of the installation of the organ. Every one.

    It is easier to hire a new organist than to put up with one who feels he is called by God to make the church install a pipe organ so that he can play it.

    (it is interesting, that it is rare for a woman to take such a stand. Women may be, indeed, smarter than men.)

    If you want a new organ, carefully study and present all the alternatives fairly. Ignore organ salespeople - both pipe and digital - who talk badly of others and their instruments. In fact, don't ignore, instead run fast the other direction.

    The Organ Clearing House is the first place to go for a used pipe organ. The reason that the pictures don't change is that very few churches can afford to buy and install a pipe organ - a used one costs about 80% of the cost of a new one. Many people organ builders will try to keep you from talking to OCH - not because they charge a fee, but because they also will renovate and install these organs - work that pipe organ builders want to do for you...

    To show how crazy this all is, a survey of piporg-l was taken by a small group. To the question of what is the best organ to have to play and the response was overwhelming Aeolian-Skinner. Except for one select group - those who played Aeolian-Skinner organs. They, without exception, named organs by other builders.

    We organists are a weird lot. I'm closing my cell door and locking it, going into the back, dark corner where it is safe from all the craziness that erupts in this discussion.

  • Clerget - First of all, a couple hundred dollars twice a year should not be a deciding factor. And, even if you are correct, and in the end the costs are equal, great, why not have something real and of superior quality for the same cost as an artificial digital?
  • Let's also keep in mind 100 years is a CONSERVATIVE estimate of a pipe organ's life. I currently play an 1879 H&H and, before that, 1890 Hamil.
  • chonakchonak
    Posts: 9,216
    Maybe the organ should be selected according to the building. If it's an unattractive church that looks like a school gymnasium, we don't want it to last another 100 years anyway, so they could get a cheap organelle. :-)
  • We have got several subthreads going on.

    Digitals

    I am always going to favour pipes over speakers but realistically a toaster organ has its uses especially as a temporary measure while you save up for something better on the basis that it is better to have some organ music than none at all. Once there is organ music again then the desire for better will help funding.

    Arguing against this is the risk that some PIPs will see that you have a serviceable simulacrum, and may feel that any money that might have been raised for a proper instrument might now be better spent elsewhere.

    Certainly I would not think 100k spent on a digital organ would be a sensible investment for interim use. So if you go down this route, don't overspend on the digital but do make sure that what you do get has a decent sound system - better two manuals with multi-channel amps and speakers than four manuals where the sound comes from somewhere near the organists knees. This way you can make decent music but have still have something clearly better to offer in future.

    (And whatever you do don't leave organ duties solely to Mr Jones who plays the piano a bit - nothing is quite so likely to produce dissatisfaction with the organ as an instrument of worship as hearing it played not-especially-brilliantly every Sunday).

    A new (or used)organ

    Used can be very good if the instrument is of decent quality in the first place and still in good enough condition where most of the useful parts still have some life and (very importantly) will fit in the space available. There is little benefit to having a newly installed organ that will need major work in a few years and still less in having a bargain that requires major structural or architectural alterations to the church in order to make it fit.

    However there are some complete dogs out there. Early 20th Century octopods or near octopods with painfully slow pneumatic actions have little to commend them no matter how cheaply they may come. These may be especially difficult to advertise as an improvement to the liturgy when put together with Mr Jones's limited organ skills; such a combination might have even a rabid organ enthusiast thinking of the possible merits of guitars and electronic keyboards.

    Be realistic about what you can expect for other people's money. While I'd perhaps dispute the 80% mentioned above it's a matter of degree; the whole cost when it is finally installed and ready to be blessed will probably be a significant proportion of the cost of a new bespoke instrument.

    Funding

    This is your original question and one that has only been partially addressed. Know how much you want to raise and don't forget to allow for inflation - this process will take years unless you get really lucky


    Turn yourself into a salesman, not of cars or soap powder or even organs but of ideas. Sell the idea to your everyone, but make sure that your pastor knows and approves even if he does not actively encourage at first - folks can be prickly if they don't feel they have been consulted often enough or early enough. HAVE A VISION AND ARTICULATE THAT VISION CLEARLY - support it with pictures, sound and video.

    You have to believe in what you are trying to achieve and sustain that belief over a period years in the face of opposition that can range from mild disinterest to outright hostility - that's not easy.

    As noted earlier much of the funding in these sorts of fundraisers can tend come from one source - a bequest or a donation from one wealthy individual or family can make all the difference.

    The 10 and 20 dollar donations and proceeds form things like bake sales and fundraising concerts will add up, but not at a rate that will encourage others to dip a little deeper.

    If you can get one person or group to help seed things it's much easier to start the little thermometer with a good chunk of change already showing in the bank. If the goal is half a million, starting the thermometer off at $500 will tend to kill interest rather than stimulate- the difference between the hope and the reality is seen as just too much and just too far to go.

    Learn about different forms of giving - employer matching on regular weekly or monthly donations can make a huge difference. Don't forget bequests and legacy gifts - I am not suggesting you target the old and frail during fundraising, but it should be something you should be able to discuss with these folks without embarrassment if they come to you.
    Thanked by 2ContraBombarde Blitz
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,982
    I have posted this before, but a local church wanted a pipe organ. They contacted the Andover Co. which drew up a design. The organ started out rather small, but as funds became available, other ranks were added. For years, there was no trumpet. It took 18 years, but the organ was finally completed according to the original design. That takes commitment and resolve, but it can be done with a plan and a good builder.

    I have seen used organs installed for figures nearer 50 to 60% of a new instrument. That depended, of course, on what kind of shape the instruments were in, and how they integrated into the structure of the building.
  • Maybe the organ should be selected according to the building. If it's an unattractive church that looks like a school gymnasium, we don't want it to last another 100 years anyway, so they could get a cheap organelle. :-)


    Don't even worry about it, they probably already have plans to buy the synth, drum set, and guitar/bass amps. Organs and organists need not apply. :)
    Thanked by 2CharlesW Adam Wood
  • JahazaJahaza
    Posts: 470
    If you assume that a digital is around 100,000 for a new installation and would last 25-30 years, you can safely say that you'd purchase 4 in the same span as 1 pipe organ, but with no built-in maintenance costs such as tuning.

    There actually are some maintenance costs even for a digital.

    The digital organ at one of the churches I sing at needed (or still needs, I don't remember) its pedals refelted.
  • For rebuilt, older instruments, in addition to contacting Organ Clearing House and Patrick Murphy, also be in touch with Andover Organs (Methuen, Massachusetts) and David Storey (Baltimore, Maryland), who have a number of excellent instruments in storage. They all do excellent restoration and rebuilding work.
    Thanked by 1Blitz
  • Looks like one really does learn something every day.
  • Theo
    Posts: 50
    I know this is a an off-topic question, but let me ask anyway: When raising funds for a new organ, is there more flexibility at a parish administered by a religious order than one staffed by diocesan priests?
  • For purchaces of this size, there's usually a review and approval process at the diocesan level. There may be a difference in how this works between diocesan and 'order' parishes (as well as between dioceses).
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,982
    True, Daniel. In my diocese the parish can approve projects up to a certain dollar amount. After that, it has to get approval from, and be financed by the diocese. The parish repays the diocese instead of a commercial lender.
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,982
    Beautiful instrument.
  • You should consider a Hauptwerk virtual organ. I recently visited Trinity Episcopal in Red Bank, NJ, which just installed an incredible sounding HW system for about $50k, including 11 organ sample sets. They used some of their old speaker system and the console, and installed a custom computer and touch screen. The organist, Alan Robinson, loves it. And, the sound is incredible.
    Thanked by 1Blitz
  • If getting an old pipe organ restored, make sure that there is a good trumpet stop on it somewhere. That will get a work-out for weddings and big occasions such as Easter and Christmas.
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,982
    And make sure that trumpet stop extends to 16' in the pedal for playing French toccatas. They are very popular as wedding postludes.
  • Adam WoodAdam Wood
    Posts: 6,482
    You should consider a Hauptwerk virtual organ. I recently visited Trinity Episcopal in Red Bank, NJ, which just installed an incredible sounding HW system for about $50k, including 11 organ sample sets. They used some of their old speaker system and the console, and installed a custom computer and touch screen.


    Hauptwerk is free.
    They used a console and speakers they already owned.
    A computer fast enough to run HW can be build for a grand or bought for two.

    What did they spend $50K on?

    Are the Organ samples THAT expensive?
  • Hauptwerk is free.


    Its not, but out of $50k you will get an awful lot of change.

    Sample sets vary, but not more than a few hundred is typical. Why, oh why, would you need eleven different sample sets in a church- surely that is more the organist playing around with the toys rather than a good investment of parish funds?

    If you already have a console the cost of a decent Hauptwerk set up is in midi-fying it to use with your setup (if it isn't already midi capable) and in providing a decent number of digital audio interfaces, amplifiers and speakers along with computer with enough grunt to make everything work reliably. These costs add upo quite quickly for a DIY project and quicker if you are paying someone else to do it

    Like most things you can build a lower cost Hauptwerk system which sounds "OK" at home but to get it to work really well you need to invest in powerful multi-channel sound systems.

    Even then pipes are going to be better but possibly not if you only have 50K to spend?

  • The advanced edition of HW software is about $600. I have a HW system at home, and if you want to get any kind of decent sample sets, you're going to need 16GB or better yet 24GB of RAM memory in a computer. Several thousand dollars for a Dell computer with that capability. More for a MAC or custom built. Same would be true for a church installation.

    Certainly HW is not a "toy," as much as Walker Technical is not a toy. It is a serious system which, in my view, certainly is superior to a small-midsize pipe organ and rivals larger ones for a FRACTION of the cost. Just go to their website www.hauptwerk.com and hear some of the sample sets. Better yet, go to Red Bank. (Walker is another alternative, and local, but probably more than a decent HW installation).

    Decent sample sets range from about 500 to over $1000 each. Honestly, you'd need 1 or 2 for a church application--11 is a luxury and I wasn't suggesting you need that many. But, even if you did, it would be probably 8K for all 11.

    A significant cost would be the console and sound system, which I agree, one could accomplish for far less than $50K. But nonetheless, speakers and amplification are an expense. At Trinity, they had a console and a pre-existing sound system. Additional speakers and Def Tech subwoofers were installed.

    The point is that the HW sound quality is outstanding and can be accomplished at a fraction of the cost of a real pipe organ and is far superior to the sound of a Rodgers or Allen for the same cost. If you want a pipe organ, consider the reasons why and consider the cost. Yes, a $500K pipe organ will probably sound better than HW or Walker. Does the parish have $500K? If you have $30K or $50K to spend, I wouldn't even consider an Allen or Rodgers or a small, second-hand pipe organ that some organ builder would have to install and rebuild. I've experienced a number of HW projects. It's cutting edge and really quite something to hear and play.
  • Unfortunately, a church with a HW organ is a church that will, after this organist leaves, going to have to find another organist with an obsession with HW, to take over.

    In addition, the computer system - often the largest expense in the configuration - has a life span of the typical computer system. M&O (which uses ganged PC's) is quite upfront about this in the contracts and their churches are aware of the ongoing expense to update and replace that is expected of them.

    I have played them and marveled - but there are limitations that may not be evident to everyone, limitations which explain why very few churches are using HW as their primary instrument, though a few add stops to their existing organ this way. I'm not going to detail them or go into that...just suggesting that if you espouse having a HW organ that you need to do your homework and be ready to defend your suggestion!

    As far as being "far superior to the sound of [insert your currently available organ] here, if you want to play a recording of an organ built and voiced to some other church in your church, then this is the way to do it. Builders of [insert your currently available organ] organs have goals in building church organs that go far beyond reproducing the sound of an organ in your church - goals that involve long-lasting hardware and software that will be there after we all have retired (or been retired!) and left all that behind.

    HW can be grand to play, I agree without a doubt!
  • I think hw is here to stay and is a real cost effective alternative to pipe organs. Could be done for a lot less than 50k. If the organist can't deal with it, I'd say it's because he's a bit of a dinosaur. I know here in Philly noted organists like Michael Stairs and Peter Conti have systems and love it. If you can't adapt to new technology you're left behind. It's like someone afraid to use email or text messaging. Yes computers will have to be upgraded or changed but there are certainly ongoing expenses with pipe organs and commercial digital organs. I know walker systems (which are essentially the same) that have been in place for years. As for voicing there are many dry samples that would work in a particular church.
    My view.
    Thanked by 1Blitz
  • Peter Conti actually has a new digital that he was widely publicized with in ads and also appears in concert with a group of digitals by another builder. He/they are still dinosaurs, as you describe me and many others on this list, and they might use HW voices to supplement at times, as I do at times myself for enjoyment, but do not rely solely on HW organs to perform/make their living. Peter's actually a personal friend of my wife.

    99.99999999% of organists get up in the morning, hop into the car and with our feet fully visible like our mentor Barney, run off to work playing stone organs.

    Walker Technical Systems are not the same as HW but are complete digitals like the major brands you have mentioned that are built to the building they are going in with stop specifications - not just recordings of other organs. Walker worked for one brand then started his own firm and customized another brand until he built his own better mousetrap.

    M&O is a sort of hybrid mix - using digital stops (voices) of their choice - but using chained personal computers for the hardware, like HW.

    The best way to explain the difference between digitals and HW may be: Digitals are like flexible interactive videos in which you may determine the ending, who the characters are, where it is located. HW is a documentary about one story, with its characters and in just one location. HW could offer custom organ stop lists, designs for your church and music program, but that's not their goal at this point - essentially they are a boutique builder that has a small staff that very creatively makes a living by copying entire organs in place and sells those recordings to you to play on your own hardware.

    Most buyers want a turnkey instrument with assurance that the company will be there in the future to support this instrument and look at the history of the longevity of the company as a gauge to determine future availability to provide parts, support and training.

    HW is not interested in competing on that level - being unwilling to build, sell and support turnkey instruments. That's not their market. They are already being challenged by other software organs. Yes, there are others building consoles, others supplying audio - but no priest wants to buy something that requires going through a check list to figure who to call to fix it....is the the keyboard? The audio? The computer? The interface?

    The major builders of digitals and pipe organs succeed by supplying everything and then providing long-term support to keep it playing.

    You've got to choose your battle, HW has and is being successful. But I know of no priest who is about to go out and buy a HW, buy the computers, get the keyboards and pedalboard, hook it all up, purchase an audio system without an organist pushing for it. When that organist leaves...dinosaurs will not be lining up to take over.

    For those interested in knowing more about HW, http://www.milandigitalaudio.com .

    They advertise: Perform on the most sought-after pipe organs, recorded on location from around the world.
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,982
    It's a good thing to be able to call that dedicated organ technician, and let him worry about fixing problems. My experience with electronics is that they fail more often than well-designed pipe instruments. A pipe instrument can be repaired in 50 years, while electronic parts can disappear from the market and no longer be available when needed.
  • A bit of a dinosaur?

    I can't even have this discussion anymore. Comparing every type of FAKE, NOT REAL organs to text messaging and cell phones is a ridiculous argument.

    People who prefer or will only play a REAL pipe organ are NOT equivalent to people who will not use e-mail, text or cell phones.

    Rather, electronic organs are akin to replacing the choir with synthesized electronic voices capable of being programmed to sing real words and sound like the human voice. They just aren't voices at all no matter how much you say they are!
    Thanked by 3Ben CharlesW Gavin
  • Rather, electronic organs are akin to replacing the choir with synthesized electronic voices capable of being programmed to sing real words and sound like the human voice. They just aren't voices at all no matter how much you say they are!


    So true, so true...the cost of candles at your church to provide light to the congregation must be absolutely mind-boggling....unless you are using torches.

    Have you found an order of nuns to live there and weekly stomp the grapes to make the wine for Mass after they have harvested the wheat to bake the hosts?

    Welcome to the Amish Church. We rely on no stinkin' modern devices, instead we go without...

    No one has suggested that synthesized human voices be singing. Priests have made the decision not to buy pipe organs not me or you...take up your fight with them. But an attitude of all or nothing would get them interested in synthesized voice choirs and cantors real fast.

    Do you think people in prior centuries get so crazy about having to play harmoniums? Or is this a modern, "we're entitled" thing, I wonder.


    Are we really about making music for the Mass when we refuse to play anything but a "real organ"? I'd say this creates a real dividing line that does not belong in this group.
  • A harmonium is a real instrument. A piano is as well. At the chapel where I play for mass several days a week, there is no organ of any kind, only a Knabe grand piano. It is fantastic for supporting and accompanying the song of the 25 or so people who gather for daily mass. And it is there by my urging, after dealing with an "electronic piano" for the first year of this assignment and encouraging my boss to look into a real piano being donated. An electronic anything is a facsimilie; it is not real.

    I do not "refuse" to play anything. For the past three years in my parish job I have played an electronic organ which is now failing - miserably. It is for that reason that we are putting in a pipe organ this winter.

    If it must be an electronic instrument, then so it must be. But let's not celebrate it. Let's understand it for what it is, namely, a defeat and "the best we could do with what little money we had."
  • If it must be an electronic instrument, then so it must be. But let's not celebrate it. Let's understand it for what it is, namely, a defeat and "the best we could do with what little money we had."


    But seriously, don't you find it hard not to turn on the car radio and listen to choral music and Bob Conrad on WCLV - since that's a "defeat and "the best we could do with what little money we had."

    Or do you carry your vocal ensemble in the back seat for entertainment on long drives?
  • matthewjmatthewj
    Posts: 2,700
    I listen to talk radio.
  • I think you're wrong on this one, FNJ. I don't think that it has to be a pipe-organ-or-nothing mentality, but a synthesized sound can never be as optimal as a live one. Compromise might be necessary because of budget, space, acoustics, etc., but it shouldn't be preferred.