This is inculturation at its best, I think – real, authentic American chant brought into the Roman liturgy. The melodies are sturdy and charming, and I’m pretty sure they will wear well. The melodies move in almost predictable ways, oftentimes pentatonic, but the rhythmic alteration between 2s and 3s gives it just the right amount of interest.
I say this should be the second chant setting in the U.S. Roman missal, after the ICEL chants based on Latin chant.
-awr
Shaker music is, properly, unaccompanied. That is my preference, and I wrote the music with the idea that it would be a good setting in cases where accompaniment is not available- small churches, daily mass, etc.
However, I have absolutely no objection to anyone writing and/or using an accompaniment- so long as it is always clear to whoever would want to know which thing I wrote and which thing someone else wrote. I have a hard time imagining it with instruments, but that should not stop someone who can from doing so.
I’d be particularly interested and excited if someone who is conversant with shape-note/early-American music would write a four-part harmonization to be sung by a loud and untrained congregation.
I’d be particularly interested and excited if someone who is conversant with shape-note/early-American music would write a four-part harmonization to be sung by a loud and untrained congregation.
Well done. And nice use of liquescents on the Sanctus.
To participate in the discussions on Catholic church music, sign in or register as a forum member, The forum is a project of the Church Music Association of America.