Palestrina — Illumina Oculos — Canon at unison
  • RagueneauRagueneau
    Posts: 2,592
    Anybody know if this is an authentic canon by Palestrina ?

    image
  • CHGiffenCHGiffen
    Posts: 5,192
    It's attribution to Palestrina is considered dubious, but, yes, it is a strict (authentic) canon. Here is Edward Tambling's edition of the work at CPDL.
  • Heath
    Posts: 966
    JMO, your version is "minor-ish", while Charles' is mixolydian, it seems . . . why the difference?
  • RagueneauRagueneau
    Posts: 2,592
    Heath,

    I honestly don't know: but I had a feeling this piece might not be by Palestrina ... I am grateful for the info !
Add a Comment