Every composer is sui generis. But there are incredible similarities, even down the intervals of the fugue and the harmonic content. Do you see (hear) it?
Pachelbel may have gotten his due revival had it not been for that Canon and Gigue that found its way to the silver screen. I find his music to be a fascinating mix of German attention to detail with Italian charm. We should be promoting him more as he is the Catholic contemporary of Bach and Telemann (and Handel).
I think we revere the Lutheran composers because of their perceived depth, which is residue from Romantic-era thought.
I am proudly and unashamedly Romantic. I had the privilege of hearing--in person--great conductors of the Romantic tradition. I'll take their interpretations any day over supposedly musicologically informed performances IF musicality is missing from the latter.
Bach is an incredibly cosmopolitan composer. One can find more nationalities in a single one of his organ works than in a Trader Joe's frozen food aisle! Seriously though, the South Germans really did a fine job developing the fugue, although I think for organ work perhaps Buxtehude should be credited as the greatest influence upon JSB. I studied a few semesters ago the Prelude and Fugue in A Major - you can't tell me that doesn't have Bux's fingerprints all over it!
Francis was right to point out the descent from the flatted La degree as characteristically Bach - take a look at the fugue from the Fantasy and Fugue in C Minor! I think the genius of Bach isn't just the numbers, but the beauty he creates with them. Something as cliched as a 9-8 suspension can become a moment of poignant beauty in his hands.
To participate in the discussions on Catholic church music, sign in or register as a forum member, The forum is a project of the Church Music Association of America.