This summer I spent some time in Paris, not so much looking at the sites, but rather looking for the Church. France is such an early Church, the "eldest daughter" of Catholicism. I wanted to hear what she had to say. What I found was not always encouraging. The amazing architecture of the churches was often flattened out by liturgical furnishings (altar, chairs, crucifixes) that were either plain or, frankly, hideous. While the organists were universally wonderful, the congregational song was like that of the US low point, perhaps 20 years ago. With one inspiring exception, the Cathedrale de Notre Dame.
At Notre Dame, the Mass began with a simple verse from St. Paul, sung to the hymn tune GRAEFENBERG.
Dieu fait pour nous en Jesus-Christ des hommes libres tout vient de lui, tout est pour lui qu'il nous delivre!
This refrain was sung antiphonally with Psalms sung by the very skilled cantors. Everyone could easily sing this simple, textually rich refrain, even the many tourists from around the world. It struck me that this would be a very viable way of setting the proper texts of the Mass.
I've started working on a project called the Hymn Tune Propers. The idea is to sing the proper text for the Mass of the Day. Unlike Gregorian Chant, it is so simple to sing--like a hymn--that the whole congregation can easily join in. Then they can relax and watch the Entrance Procession while the choir sings the Psalm. When the procession is over, the choir and congregation sing the Glory be, set to the same hymn tune.
It goes without saying that this project is not intended to be in competition with other projects involving propers. Indeed, competition is hardly the point. Very few parishes in the United States use proper texts at all--it is beyond the scope of "normal" pastoral imagination. This is not about competition but about promoting the idea of using propers in the widest variety of formats possible, in order that the most parishes possible will have an opportunity to sing the proper texts of the Mass. Nor is this intended to be a replacement for chant, but rather a bridge to chant.
Anyone is perfectly free to use any of these texts in any way they would like.
To you, O Lord, I lift my soul I trust in You, save me from shame. Let not my foes boast over me. Save those who trust in you from shame. -or- Protect the ones who trust your name.
Advent 2
Let Zion's people see the Lord Who comes to set the nations free. The Lord will sound His glorious voice. Your heart will hear Him joyfully.
Advent 3
Rejoice at all times in the Lord. Be glad, rejoice, I say again. Let your unselfishness be seen. Indeed, the Lord is near at hand.
Advent 4
Let dew fall down from heav'n above. O clouds, rain down the Righteous One. And let the earth be opened up, And let the longed-for Savior come.
I believe this is complete now for introits for Advent and the Christmas season. More to follow in a couple of weeks. Meanwhile, Adam Wood is working hard on a project of his own, with many Psalms versified as well as antiphons.
Please let me know if there are any omissions or if you would like to have something customized. Cheers!
I see that the Christmas Vigil and Midnight Mass Introits are Short Meter (66. 86) instead of Long Meter. Just a heads-up, because I was a bit surprised when I began looking for seasonal hymn tunes to go with these wonderful introits.
Hmm. Firstly I don't think I understand for certain what you are saying, dearest Kathy. Any idea that helps propers be used and has more traditional melodies is nice.
I think the idea of using hymn tunes as been done before by Christopher Tiestze and World Library Publications and is already in use by a few hundred parishes (My the spelling or names might be mistake). I wouldn't say I impressed with the results, certainly it was "OK", it can not be denied it is good progress in the right direction.
It seems to me that an antiphon that is able to be remembered well works fine. Another idea is to use the same antiphon melody over and over again for 1 month periods. Similar to some of the antiphons in the byzantine liturgy which are part of the ordinary in their case, but tend to not vary the melody very often. formulaic melodies have a long tradition in all traditional liturgical music.
I would go with good forumulaic non-metrical melodies for use anyday, over simple metrical modern melodies and paraphrase texts.
Anyway best wishes, this whole propers idea has yet to be throughoughly exhausted, many brilliant possiblies exist
My project is different from Dr. Tietze's, insofar as I am not setting the Psalms. I envision these antiphons being sung with Psalms in Psalm tones.
I agree that a seasonal tune would work well.
These antiphons are remarkably easy to recast into verse, by the way. I think that is because they were thoughtfully translated to be spoken. They tend to be iambic, which is a natural spoken meter in English, and they tend to be in four phrases, and not far from dimeter. The diction is already elevated yet simple and dignified, which is just what I aim for when writing hymns. All I have to do is find some synonyms to make the meter exact, and a single rhyme to link line 2 and 4. I'm not changing much.
While you're singing it to Conditor Alme Siderum, why not use a matching psalm tone?
Attached is a psalm tone, with accompaniment, that I wrote for this very purpose five years ago. Use it for the verses and gloria patri - or not. Your choice!
Gavin, small suggestion: at the end of the first "measure", why not leave the tenor on the high D? That way, you avoid the parallel octave and you add the third tone to complete the G major chord. Just a thought.
Heath, see the thread started by Francis, "Parallel octaves are beautiful."
Kidding! As soon as I ran this off, 5 years ago, I noticed it and was too lazy to make the change to the Finale file. Before I posted it, I remembered, "there's something wrong with this... but what??" At any rate, it's intended for unison singing, and I see no cause to have accompaniment at all!
Gavin, you are addressing a question I have had in the back of my mind for a few days: how do you match a Psalm tone to a hymn tune? Yours is an interesting solution, a Psalm tone that is in some sense an imitation of the hymn tune. It's simpler, though, a recitative. Interesting!
This is what I forwarded to Kathy earlier today, and we've since discussed the essential reasons I offered a "different perspective" on this setting. The use of "LAMBILOTTE" (Come Holy Ghost) is obvously, at first glance, counter-intuitive for Ps.25 and Advent in general, compared to the obvious ease of CONDITOR or PUER NOBIS/VON HIMMEL HOCH. But I based my tune assignment upon the text painting that occurs with the basically ascending melody , 5, 5, 5, 1 etc. that is inherent in LAMBILOTTE. One could build a defense of the tune use based upon some other considerations, Immaculate Conception, Guadalupe and of course, Annunciation, but that wasn't the deciding factor. The melody/text relation and familiarity with the tune by all Catholics I believe argue in its favor over the immediate cognitive dissonance re. Pentecost.
The verse shown below was an attempt to find a middle ground between a "psalm tone" approach, and a gradual verse without melismas, combined with a motivic resonance to the hymntune, however couched in a chant medium. Please ignore the barlines, didn't take time to eliminate them.
In the land of "let a thousand flowers bloom" this approach is still in concert with the principals of Musica Sacram. But you may feel free to argue against these approaches.
Sorry, Francis, I'm not following your point here. Do you mean the avoidance of the strophic antiphon, or deficiency in the verse? And really, I don't love to argue, I just don't hesitate when so engaged.
I would like to thank everyone for their contributions.
Also to remind folks that if you are looking for metrical versions of hymns for the office, the Mundelin psalter has the the office hymns for every day of the year in CM or similar metric. Very singable.
THANK YOU!!!!!!...I doubt I can convince the choir to sing the Propers on Sundays anytime soon.....but on weekdays there's no choir....that might be a discreet introduction....! Your work is wonderful!
FP
I'm in awe of the introits. They are Scriptural, theological, intensely hopeful.
I feel we don't have to talk about negatives anymore. It's not so much that some songs are better than others. We can keep approaching the proper, proper Propers.
Anyways, the above versifications includes Long Meter (8.8.8.8) adaptations of the Entrance Antiphon for every day through Advent, unless I am missing a feast or two. Please let me know if there is something missing that you would like done.
I hope to finish the Christmas season soon. Cheers!
Seeing Kathy's Dec 17-24 set, I observe that the tune Veni Emmanuel is Long Meter. It seems to me that one of the possible ways to use these metrical introits is by using tunes that either are already familiar to congregations or by introducing Gregorian hymn tunes, especially those that are very seasonal (as this thread has focused on Advent and Christmas).
If as Kathy said, part of this is to 'approach the proper, proper Propers,' one part of that might be to use the Gregorian tunes to familiarize congregations with that sound. It's been great to see these bursts of creativity!
After Kathy Pluth set forth her "Hymn Tune Introits" idea, I wrote to her and we exchanged a few e-mails with the idea of putting together her Metrical Introit adaptations with Psalm verses (from the Revised Grail Psalter) set to Anglican Chant music that I have been composing. To get the ball rolling, I have already set the Advent I Introit and Verses, utilizing the hymn tune "Conditor alme siderum" together with an arrangement from Penitential (Anglican) Chant music that I have employed in the past during Lent (I plan use this music both for Advent and for Lent settings of the Introit Psalm verses).
Two PDF scores for this initial pairing are attached, one with the tune for "Conditor alme siderum" that most Catholics are familiar with and one with the ever-so-slightly different tune that comes from the Sarum plainsong and is prevalent amongst Anglicans (the only difference is in the fifth note of the tune). Kathy and I feel that having both versions makes this work equally accessible to tradtional Catholics and Anglican Use Catholics alike.
The chants are in their original "key" (F major/D minor) and match well the Mode IV tonality of the "Conditor" (transposed), even though the final of the chant is invariably on F and not on A. I thought about putting the "Conditor..." down a perfect fourth in its natural place, while keeping the chant where it is. This also works modally and places the Antiphon in a better vocal range, although the initial and final E in the resulting hymn tune then serve as the leading tone (dominant) into the F of the chant. It has even occurred to me that (say for the last time through the hymn tune) it could be sung in organum with the second voice pitched a perfect fourth below the written notes.
Kathy and I will be working the kinks out of the formatting process. In this version, the chanted verses have been rather carefully set as they should be sung (like speech!), and I may continue this process with all the chants for the major seasons and feasts (but simply use Anglican pointing with single and/or double chants for Ordinary Time). In particular, note the "three beat" measures in both the second and third verse groups: they would normally be notated with just two beats, the pointing indicating that two syllables are sung to one of the beats, although in chanting one should not sing these syllables twice as fast.
Kathy, It occurred to me to ask: inasmuch as the Offertorio "restates" the same psalm proper as the Introit, what is your take on using your metric verse as an Offertory?
Sorry to be so late in posting here, but it has been very hectic since Thanksgiving arrived and went. This consolidates what is already finished so far with our Hymn Tune Introits for Advent.
Here is the booklet (suitable for printing, landscape, on legal paper); in order, the sheets contain the pages 12-1, 10-3, 8-5, 6-7, 4-9, 11-2: Hymn Tune Introits for Advent - booklet
Attached are the Sunday Antiphons of the Hymn Tune Introits for Advent (all four Sundays used as "stanzas" to the tune Conditor Alme Siderum), suitable for congregational use in singing the Antiphon of the Introit. Also attached are the Hymn Tune Introits for the Weekdays of Advent (before Dec. 17th), similarly given as "stanzas" of Conditor Alme Siderum but also with the "Glory be..." Anglican Chant.
Also attached is a "squarenotes" version of the Introit for Advent I (already past), to show how the melody line would be sung/chanted (for those Gregorian Chant oriented singers not all that familiar with Anglican Chant). Indeed, with or even without organ accompaniment, the Advent Introits could easily be chanted by a cantor alone, following this model.
The Introits for (weekday use) Dec. 17 through Dec. 24 will follow shortly, to the tune Veni, Veni Emmanuel.
Hymn Tune Introits for the Weekdays of Advent.pdf
86K
Hymn Tune Introits for Advent - Sunday Antiphons.pdf
I don't suppose these are being updated for Lent, by chance? I started the SEP introit with my parish recently, but am getting feedback that it is too much too soon. I would love to start with some hymn tune introits!
I just finished harmonizing the tune being used for Lent (think: "The glory of these forty days") and only have to enter text and tweak the chant tune. I should have the first thre Sundays of Lent posted by sometime this weekend. Thanks for you interest, and I hope you will find the setting to your liking.
I haven't done this with Communion antiphons yet. I could--but I haven't.
The reason is that there is a limited market for these texts. And the reason for that is a kind of snobbery on the part of music directors.
No offense. Hear me out on this one.
So I said to a priest who doesn't read music: "Sing this entrance antiphon." Now if I had given it to him with musical notation, he wouldn't have sung it. He wouldn't have just ignored the music. He would have ignored all of it.
But because it had no musical notation, and I told him to sing it to Creator of the Stars of Night, he did.
Now we as musicians don't feel comfortable with this sort of thing, because we feel that people should only be singing things written in the music-text hybrid notation that makes perfect sense to us.
Four times now I've talked with excellent publishers about publishing this music, and all have been interested, until we got to this one question. What about the music? What music are we going to write and print underneath the words?
The publishers are judging, rightly as it seems to me, that music directors will not buy text-alone products. I understand this and in part sympathize. Music is a liberal art, and people learn to read music as they sing, and that is all good. But, for those who can't sing--and it is hard for us as musicians to get into their heads--musical notation is a turn off.
The Hymn Tune Introit project is for just such people: non-musicians. Asking entire congregations of musically illiterate people to learn brand-new antiphons every. single. week. is difficult. Asking them to do this when the very idea of singing antiphons is foreign is almost impossible. In many congregations it is simply too much to ask.
That is why propers are almost universally not-sung. Because that first step is too difficult.
So as a kind of training wheels, to get people used to the idea of singing propers, I just rearranged all the entrance antiphons in rhyming Long Meter form, so that they can be sung to whichever tunes are already known to a given particular congregation. Congregations' repertoires are different, and so a wide variety of options are possible. Printing musical settings would be completely counterproductive, because they would specify the music.
Specification is the opposite of what is needed here, because what is needed are options.
But since musicians really won't buy text-alone products, publishers won't publish them, which is a roundabout explanation of why I haven't written a cycle of Communion antiphons.
I understand. Perhaps this could be done and put out on the net for free as a resource? I know that doesn't put bread and butter on the table, but perhaps as an occasional - do one a month until they are done- sort of project? Our parish is trying to improve the music and liturgy we do. Few read music, no one reads chant. After this long of liturgical chaos there is no common body of hymns to take as a core. We have Masses that are supposed to be different styles, but that is a very ill defined concept. I have all this info about propers , and chant, in Latin and English, and even psalm tones, and it is still too far beyond the reach of what can be done. The hymn tunes idea seemed like a perfect idea to me, because it would introduce some key concepts - there is a given text to sing, and also the idea of using the psalm in between a known repeated refrain. I think this is idea that should get more attention. We sang 'Somewhere over the rainbow' for Corpus Christi communion this year. to quote a seven year old member of my schola with a puzzled look- 'Is that even about Jesus?'
Please consider what you can do to help. Maybe putting the parameters of the project out there means a bunch of people could have a go. We could work to a common tune or metre for example, and keep track of what has been produced and what has not.
Perhaps you could post about the texts you were using on the project, where to find them etc, and some pointers about how you go about turning them into metre. (not sure how to describe that - poetising them?)
maybe we could even manage to do it over the next year and just stay ahead of the weeks one at a time.
I appreciate your interest, truly, but I have a lot of irons in the fire just now and wouldn't have time.
I suppose my other hesitation to doing Communion antiphons is that they aren't actually necessary.
One could easily take the Responsorial Psalm resource that they usually employ, pull out the 8 ad libitum Communion Psalms, and sing them in rotation. In fact that is my recommendation for the very first step towards propers. It's very low-confrontation, and at a time when people aren't necessarily eager to sing out of a book, while they're in line for Communion.
By the way, I'm terribly sorry that you had to put up with showtunes on Corpus Christi. I had thought that this was an era whose time had come and gone, and am sorry to hear that it is still possible to have to endure this sort of nonsense.
To participate in the discussions on Catholic church music, sign in or register as a forum member, The forum is a project of the Church Music Association of America.