I recently spent some time at a Benedictine abbey in the congregation of Solesmes. I noticed, in a way that I somehow hadn't specifically noticed before, that they pitch their chant quite high. I didn't verify but it seemed like their reciting tones were at B or C or thereabouts, so a good third (sometimes fourth) higher than I'm accustomed to. It facilitates a head dominant sound which is gracile and ethereal, and it's beautiful, but not 100% to my taste in this one aspect. In passing, I found they were also fairly light on the consonants, which is perfectly coherent with their aesthetic but again not my preference.
In reading more about this - seeking to understand if my preference for chest-dominant chant had any historical basis - I ran across a reference from St. Bernard of Clairvaux who required his Cistercian monks to sing in virili voce, which is perhaps interpretable as a more chest dominant voice (and perhaps by extension with robust consonants). Can any of the learned members here weigh in this, whether with insight on the Solesmes aesthetic, the concept of virili voce, medieval chant practices, or just perpectives on situating the chant mainly within the chest voice?
Marcel Pérès has claimed that, by the time of Gajard, much of the chant at Solesmes was sung as much as a fifth higher than what had previously been customary in France. You might take a look at @Charles_Weaver's post about church keys—and keep in mind that the old tuning standard in France was a whole step lower than modern concert pitch! There is just no way to take head voice down that low. The "Frenchified" (as one of my priests used to call it) sound isn't unique to the Solesmes congregation; in my experience, it's fairly widespread among TLM communities. I have no proclivity toward it at all and would prefer for my men to sing like Romans, not Frenchmen. Another component of that French style seems to be encouraging singing with a constantly raised soft palate. I would be interested to hear what others have to say about this specifically.
As for light consonants, are you hearing something that is quantitatively different, i.e., simply weaker consonants, or a qualitative difference, i.e. dental ts and unaspirated consonants? Very often, it is possible to detect Anglo/American choirs in otherwise very fine recordings in Italianate Church Latin simply by how hard they attack plosive consonants. It's not the Roman style. Neither is singing Latin with a French accent!
Perhaps the lighter, head voice dominant vocal mechanism allowed the monks to maintain the amount of singing that they need to do in a day (my understanding is the dynamic is also quite soft). Whereas a chest dominant mechanism would tire more easily.
Alternatively, perhaps the head voice dominance was a 19th century reaction to the prevalent operatic style of the time. Solesmes was trying hard to develop a new way of chanting which was recognized by Pius X and others as feeling more “spiritual.” Since most secular singing (and ecclesiastical I would bet) was chest voice dominant by the late 1800s, maybe the head voice style was a reaction to that.
To participate in the discussions on Catholic church music, sign in or register as a forum member, The forum is a project of the Church Music Association of America.