• Habemus papam! Are Pope Leo's XIV's views on liturgy known, or will we just have to wait and see?
  • CatholicZ09
    Posts: 319
    I’ve read that he’s much more favorable to the TLM.
  • He definitely seems like it, he actually came out in the full Papal Garments- he also used the "ci" form when speaking Italian. These are all good signs of tradition.
    Thanked by 2CHGiffen tomjaw
  • MatthewRoth
    Posts: 2,728
    No one knows what he thinks about the TLM. Anything to the contrary is pure speculation and frankly copium.
  • Chrism
    Posts: 882
    Against copium, black pills, trollbait, and disaffection from our sweet Christ on earth, deliver us o Lord!
  • Diapason84
    Posts: 110
    Well, he's on the wrong side of things already with Amoris Laetitia, synodality, etc., and the synodal welcoming mat does not extend to folks who worship according to the 1962 Missal.
  • Synodality applied evenly and fairly should result in everyone getting a fair hearing on matters of liturgy.
  • TimTheEnchanterTimTheEnchanter
    Posts: 215
    I have no idea about his liturgical preferences, but what I really care about is that he's from Chicago, and I'm from Chicago* and work in Chicago* (*well, the suburbs, though I lived in the city a couple years). There's a lot of excitement around here, and we think we will see a solid bump in attendance this weekend (more so than Mother's Day weekend and First Communions during weekend Masses already provide).
    Thanked by 1Heath
  • Diapason84
    Posts: 110
    Synodality applied evenly and fairly should result in everyone getting a fair hearing on matters of liturgy.


    Liturgy is not up for democratic debate.
    Thanked by 1mmeladirectress
  • chonakchonak
    Posts: 8,995
    The CMAA site has the traditional prayers for the Pope and for the clergy, including a sample chant recording:
    https://churchmusicassociation.org/leoxiv/

    Thanked by 2CHGiffen Bri
  • chonakchonak
    Posts: 8,995
    Regarding the new pope's interest in liturgy, it is said that in the 90s, he had an indult to say the old Mass [which wasn't common at the time] and he was seen doing so at a chapel in the bishops' conference offices. Also, someone sent the editor-in-chief of "The Pillar" a photo of him in a fiddleback vestment.

    If these indications are correct, and if Pope Leo follows up on his desire to spread peace in the Church, then a more relaxed approach to the traditional liturgy would fit with that.

    The new Pope's appointments to curial offices may provide some indication of his preferences.
  • MatthewRoth
    Posts: 2,728
    He wore a Roman chasuble because he was with the Sovereign Military Order of Malta at their chapel in Rome, where such is the custom. I don’t think that we can read tea leaves from it, just as we can’t from his pectoral cross placement, sometimes over, sometimes under the chasuble.

    There is no proof that he had the indult, or even said it as prefect of the dicastery, and it seems extremely unlikely that we wouldn’t have learned about it from the Pillar, given that TC enforcement in the US is something which they write about (to the detriment of the faithful).

    I’m not even trying to be a cynic or doom-and-gloom. There are just a lot of unknowns!
    Thanked by 1Chant_Supremacist
  • chonakchonak
    Posts: 8,995
    Maybe the doom-and-gloom just comes naturally?

    Please try to ease up some, OK?

  • MatthewRoth
    Posts: 2,728
    No, it really does not. (And I resent this, actually.)

    And all I’m doing is contextualizing this: normally, we’d scold people for reporting negative unsourced rumors with not even a whiff of a name attached to them, but since it’s positive, it’s OK. Which is absurd. We just don’t know, and that’s supposed to be what we want.

    As to the chasuble: it’s just not a tell of anything since there’s just one photo of one occasion in a place where that’s the house custom even today.
    Thanked by 1Chant_Supremacist
  • chonakchonak
    Posts: 8,995
    The claim that he had an indult in the '90s was attributed to the 73-year-old former rector of a major seminary in the US, perhaps specifically in the southern US:
    https://x.com/tradcathdixie/status/1920542398137983145

    As for the photo sent to The Pillar, I heard JD Flynn mention receiving it shortly after it arrived during a live video discussion today (May 8).

    I don't suggest anyone treat these things as dispositive, so if you're encouraging a wait-and-see attitude, then we really don't disagree.
  • trentonjconn
    Posts: 706
    Mass today was celebrated in Latin, which is a departure from Francis's tendency to use Italian. Collects and preface dialogue were spoken instead of sung though, which is unfortunate.
    Thanked by 1tomjaw
  • Palestrina
    Posts: 446
    My observation is that when he reads Latin, it sounds like a language - as opposed to some kind of magical incantation. He clearly understands the language and means to pray what he says. A good start…
  • fcbfcb
    Posts: 356
    His spoken Latin seemed pretty good. He kept his eyes firmly on the book, which suggests to me that he does not celebrate in Latin on a regular basis, but he also spoke with sufficient fluency to indicate that this was not his first rodeo (NB: this indicates nothing about his familiarity with the TLM).
  • Jeffrey Quick
    Posts: 2,131
    Much of what is being written is an attempt to put Leo in one box or another. Wasn't 12 years of that enough? Yes, there are things that raise my eyebrows. But we'd expect that from these cardinals. I also see a lot of cause for hope. I'd rather trust that the Holy Spirit led the electors to a good choice.
  • MatthewRoth
    Posts: 2,728
    That’s an anonymous rumor as far as I’m concerned. From a friend of the poster who talked to the elderly priest. Whee is the here? No one knows. Impossible to check.

    And it’s ridiculous. We’d have known about it since he was the head of a global religious order before becoming a bishop and then was prefect for bishops at a time when TC enforcement as a priority — Prevost wasn’t perhaps the first choice, and he tried to work with Christophe Pierre (Prevost is never mentioned in reporting about some of the major appointments of the last two years).

    There are far too many of us who are still in a very precarious position, and I think that if anything we still reserve the right to be, if not totally doom and gloom, then extremely cautious. Yes. It will be better than before. But that bar was on the floor. It is not especially hard to be nicer than Pope Francis. If the pope talks only about Our Lord, that will be a genuine improvement. But he can do that while having the worst commitments. And this is certainly a pick where it’s the most conservative guy that the liberals know.

    Plus, it’s my actual spiritual life here. People can talk about how he’s not a fan of the Germans. Great. But TC is still a problem. People talk about how under Francis we needed to just not worry about the pope or the global church or other dioceses. Great. But TC.

    The great hope that it would go unenforced was a delusion in the end. And in any case, inviting more disrespect for the law is not a good solution.

    [This is getting into the weeds, so let's discuss this off this thread.--admin]
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 12,006
    He looks like a pope so that is a good sign.
  • francis
    Posts: 10,997
    Y’all need to chill… just remember… we don’t follow A pope… we follow the faith… If the pope follows the faith, we also wind up following a pope!
  • So far, I like him. He seems a good middle ground kind of guy, which we really need right now to bring about more unity. I havent seen any red flags. There are a lot of question marks, but for now we put that in Gods hands. One commentor today said, its good to remember that Leo is not Rob just like Peter is not Simon. Grace is real. Lets pray for our holy Father to support him with our prayers so that he be docile to the Holy Spirits inspirations for the good of the church.
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 12,006
    Y’all need to chill… just remember… we don’t follow A pope… we follow the faith… If the pope follows the faith, we also wind up following a pope!


    True. Like many eastern Catholics, I tend to operate without being too conscious of the Vatican or the pope. However, its always nice to have one that can unite people and uphold the faith.
  • PLTT
    Posts: 163
    FWIW, I doubt Pope Leo celebrated the TLM. Generally there are small indicators that priests who have celebrated awith some frequency tend to retain even when celebrating the NO (things like position of hands, etc.). As for vestments - traddie vestments are only a hang-up in the Anglophone world. In many parts of Central and Eastern Europe, you will find the most apalling abuses committed by priests wearing fiddlebacks and lace. It is seen more as the cultural patrimony there. Even the shrine which he visited yesterday uses them.

    It's an achievement to have everyone from the ecclesiastical left and the right so far optimistic or cautiously optimistic about the papacy. That makes me optimistic.
  • AriasitaAriasita
    Posts: 38
    I read a report that he puts his left sock on before his right sock. A clear sign of what we can expect to see. I’m unsure of the brand of glasses or manufacturer of his watch, but time will tell. The real tell will be if he ties his shoe in single or double knots.
  • davido
    Posts: 1,049
    I already saw the video on the watch. $70 bucks and that puts him right in the tradition of Pope Francis…
    Thanked by 1Chant_Supremacist
  • I already saw the video on the watch. $70 bucks and that puts him right in the tradition of Pope Francis…


    Blackpilling hard right now.
  • francis
    Posts: 10,997
    Oh man, I gotta go out and get one of those watches! Please post pic!
    Thanked by 1tomjaw
  • ServiamScores
    Posts: 3,000
    Getting rather ultramontane vibes.
    Thanked by 2tomjaw francis
  • matthewjmatthewj
    Posts: 2,658
    He sang more of his dialogues during his first Mass with the Cardinals than his predecessor did in 12 years. Do I wish he sang the whole Mass? Obviously.. but just on this point alone, it’s a massive improvement.

    And I get the feeling we’re going to see more and more improvements.

    For many, the past 12 years has been pretty traumatic. It’ll take time to move past it.

    Long live the Pope.
    Thanked by 1LauraKaz
  • Chrism
    Posts: 882
    We discussed his predecessor's lung problems here.
    Thanked by 2CHGiffen Liam
  • AriasitaAriasita
    Posts: 38
    Liturgically traumatic? You’d use the same word that is placed after sexual, after emotional, and a whole host of other life debilitating experiences to describe the Franciscan papacy? I love liturgy. I love it when it’s well done, but I also love careful, thoughtful, and sensitive word choice.
    Thanked by 1PaxMelodious
  • matthewjmatthewj
    Posts: 2,658
    We have countless examples of Francis singing, most notably his regular singing of the Salve Regina, which in the early days of his Pontificate would be quite enthusiastic. Just not the parts of the Mass which pertain to him.

    May he rest in peace.
  • matthewjmatthewj
    Posts: 2,658
    careful, thoughtful, and sensitive word choice.


    Well, it could be too strong of a word choice but I failed to come up with another one at the moment… I’m not really talking about the liturgy here in that instance. There’s a lot more there to unpack and folks who are better writers and researchers than I will write about it in the coming years, I’m fairly sure.
    Thanked by 2MatthewRoth francis
  • AriasitaAriasita
    Posts: 38
    All peace to you, MatthewJ!!
  • Liam
    Posts: 5,257
    The Jesuit liturgical culture has long trended low/no-fuss, neither minimalist, nor, until the generation formed after Pope Francis, "creative". (A sardonic liturgical aphorism I learned when I was younger was "lost like a Jesuit in Holy Week" - which served as a warning to review plans for non-ordinary liturgies in advance with a Jesuit celebrant.) The Jesuits traditionally elaborated more with popular devotions and missions (in that regard, somewhat like their contemporaries, the Oratorians) than with the Mass itself (unlike the Oratorians), not being an order whose members normally acculturated around conventual celebration of the liturgy. Certainly, there were/are noted Jesuit liturgical scholars, but that specialty doesn't come as naturally to Jesuits as to those from branches of the Benedictine family of orders and, say, Dominicans. Of the great mendicant orders of friars founded in the High Middle Ages, I've had the least exposure to Augustinians in liturgical contexts.
  • MatthewRoth
    Posts: 2,728
    maybe but the low-fuss Jesuit can also mean Fontgombault-adjacent not necessarily in terms of wishing to celebrate 1962-with-modifications, which the monks admit works for them and their monastic family but isn’t necessarily a model for all) but in terms of the sung liturgy done soberly. Or the way they say low Mass; if you go to Saint-Eugène-Sainte-Cécile, where the parochial vicar used to be a monk of Triors, you immediately see what I’m talking about.

    And because Jesuit pastors are rarely our people (plus, liberal liturgy is often high-fuss but bad), we see these priests only filling in or on special occasions.
  • Liam
    Posts: 5,257
    "Soberly" is a good word to associate with the non-abusive/"creative" form of Jesuit liturgical culture for celebrating Mass. There would definitely be preaching, but it would definitely be concise.
    Thanked by 1CHGiffen
  • AriasitaAriasita
    Posts: 38
    MatthewRoth,

    I’m afraid I don’t understand what you mean by ‘our people’ when you reference Jesuit pastors. Can you elucidate and help me and perhaps others understand further what you meant?
  • kevinfkevinf
    Posts: 1,204
    "Our people"=liturgists actually concerned with the liturgy and folks who love the traditional Latin Mass.
  • chonakchonak
    Posts: 8,995
    I think MatthewRoth is alluding to an early 20th-century debate about perspectives on the liturgy: it's usually characterized as the "Jesuit-Benedictine" debate, and took place between scholars such as Dom Lambert Beauduin and Dom Maurice Festugière on the Benedictine side, and, on the Jesuit side, Fr. Jean–Jacques Navatel and Fr. Louis Peeters.

    The "Benedictine" view was that the liturgy is the "fount and apex" of the Christian life (the famous phrase adopted by Vatican II), whereas advocates of the Ignatian tradition treated the liturgy as one among various means available for spiritual development, with private meditation having a notable role.

    I take it that MatthewRoth is counting "our people" as those who consider the liturgy as having that distinctive importance.
  • @chonak are there any documents with these arguments. I would be really interested in reading that.
    Thanked by 2Bri CHGiffen
  • MatthewRoth
    Posts: 2,728
    Well I’m mostly thinking about, you know, people who do what we do. Literally our people.

    As to the Jesuit-Benedictine debate I simply think that the idea that Jesuits interested in liturgy are mostly academics and sort of high-fuss when they do the TLM (in particular) or that they prefer low Mass and to spare the details etc. to be false. They just have other things to do and usually have to sit in on other churches for things like Holy Week. They don’t run the show themselves particularly now. Jesuits run parishes at the request of the church, just like Dominicans… but Jesuits even more so probably shouldn’t have them. And this leads to them being staffed by people not usually interested in what we do.
  • What are the only two things that don't change at a Jesuit Mass?
    Thanked by 1tomjaw
  • trentonjconn
    Posts: 706
    The bread and the wine?
  • Kathy
    Posts: 5,508
    The Lord Works Marvels for Us All
    Hymn for the life and ministry of Pope Leo XIV

    The Lord works marvels for us all!
    His words and deeds our hearts recall
    And come to know His saving ways
    In thankfulness and quiet praise.

    The world, in need of Jesus Christ,
    Who for our sake was sacrificed,
    Awaits the word we have been taught:
    The news of what His blood has bought.

    Then let us pray in joy and hope
    For Leo, universal Pope,
    That God will give him grace to bear
    The cross of all the Churches’ care.

    O Beauty, ancient, ever new,
    Make him a light that leads to You.
    Let Peter’s message sound abroad:
    Christ Jesus is the Son of God.

    And Mary, too, our hearts implore,
    By the Incrnate God she bore,
    Who saved her as she came to be,
    To guide Pope Leo’s ministry.

    O God the Father, Spirit, Son,
    In Whom alone we live as one,
    Bring us, bring all, to share Your peace,
    And let Your grace and truth increase.

    Tune: EISENACH or any suitable LM hymn tune
    Text: Kathleen Pluth, Permission to use given through June 2025, all other rights reserved.
    Thanked by 1DCM
  • StimsonInRehabStimsonInRehab
    Posts: 1,943
    A chestnut from the late Canon Hesse:

    "I once inquired of a Jesuit, 'Is it true that Jesuits always answer a question with another question?' He replied, 'WHO TOLD YOU THAT?'"
  • Liam
    Posts: 5,257
    Well, Irish Jesuits might well do so; it's may be downstream of Englishing of the ways of the Irish language's manner with questions, to reframe them in response, because yes/no were customarily not arrows in the Irish response quiver.
  • francis
    Posts: 10,997
    "I once inquired of a Jesuit, 'Is it true that Jesuits always answer a question with another question?' He replied, 'WHO TOLD YOU THAT?'"
    o man. I have all his audios downloaded and in the armory in the case of future need. He was a stitch.