I've been reflecting a lot lately on what it means to be a highly trained musician working within the Catholic Church. I've had the experience of working in both Catholic and Anglican settings. As a Roman Catholic myself, I can't help but notice how increasingly difficult it is to remain working in Catholic parishes.
In large parishes, the structure often demands playing a constant stream of Masses, each of which tends to be the exact same musically due to the lack of distinction between high and low Masses nowadays. The repetitiveness makes it’s difficult to feel musically inspired. Perhaps I am lacking in my sense of “duty” or “service,” but I think there’s more here…
While I do lament working in the Episcopal Church, there are aspects that make it a much more rewarding environment for musical expression. I am properly compensated (unlike many Catholic job postings that offer salaries like "highly competitive" ones at $45k-50k per annum) and, perhaps more importantly, the liturgies in the conservative Anglican tradition often allow for more solemnity and creative expression.
Has anyone else experienced these tensions between working in the Catholic Church versus other liturgical traditions? How do you navigate the demands and limitations of the role while still trying to create meaningful musical experiences?
Depends on the Catholics; depends on the Anglicans.
It is unrewarding to play and sing 4 faves from Glory and Praise + Mass of Creation 8 times a weekend on a piano in a Catholic Church.
It is likewise unrewarding to play/direct whatever happens to suit the whims of an Anglican rector who thinks their calling is to make their congregation of rich, elderly WASPs more Evangelical/eco-friendly/diverse/welcoming or less rigid/colonial/papist.
But when all parties involved are doing their utmost to celebrate the liturgies they have received, and adequate resources are present, I think the Catholics have an edge. To me Westminster Cathedral’s Solemn Mass is rather more of a feast for the senses than Westminster Abbey’s Choral Eucharist.
well, also, and not to put too fine a point on it: I understand why people do things for the money, but there's more than one story of going into schism or worse, often couple with problems of the Sixth Commandment. I'm not interested in, and would not like to encourage, discussing individual cases, but it happens.
But you also have to realize that the Anglican Communion is not greener grass. I see Anglo-Catholics worshipping out of three-ring binders. Many of them allow women priests, and they are often perfectly feminine and normal, except for being a priest in an Anglican Church (including TEC; just go to Wisconsin) — and they even have traditional views but make some sort of peace with their colleagues or church employees in particular who, well, you know, live lives in rejection of the Sixth Commandment.
I see sloppiness and clutter in their churches that rivals any small devotional chapel in France or in Italy. No one agrees on vestments. No one agrees on gestures, and in both cases, not even at the same service.
The Anglo-Catholics who do things "best" do so as a caricature of preconciliar Catholicism and frankly even of the traditionalists. The genuine article is not as intense outwardly, with all of the lace and incense. St Mary the Virgin in NYC or the people under the care of the bishop of Fulham in England are over-the-top. Maybe that's mean or unfair. I don't know. I'm not even sure that I care.
I'm not a full-time musician like many of you, but those are my 2 cents.
In an ideal world, I would have an associate music director or organ scholar to help me. Even though I only have 3 Masses per weekend, it can be a real bear sometimes; then come the feast days or Holy Days when I'm expected to do a 9am, 12pm and 7pm Mass. (I haven't ruled out speaking with my pastor about adjusting musical expectations for feast days once I put a year of service in, but I digress.)
I'm not giving up on finding a "better" Roman Catholic position, but I have moments where I'm tempted to work for the MS Lutherans or Episcopalians instead.
More work, less pay. You can make a decent living as a Catholic musician and do good music at a high level, but you'll work for every penny of it, and it will probably be a case of "champagne on a beer budget" in terms of getting by with comparatively inadequate resources in some regard, whether it be personnel, instruments, facilities, music library, budget, or support from your priests. A great pastor goes a long way in making other deficiencies tolerable.
While circumstances don't make for the best of times in the Catholic for many of us, if I were to become completely dissatisfied with jobs working in Catholic churches, I would find a different field of employment. I would never consider working in a non-Catholic church. Conscience won't permit it.
I have worked in the Latin rite Novus Ordo for 42 years as of this Easter. I write as someone who did not do chant, polyphony and hymnody until about 1996-97 ( after reading Ratzinger's Spirit of the Liturgy). I have been on an increasing journey in chant and polyphony since then. Also, I am now able to do the EF comfortably and am actually a member of an FSSP parish. All this back ground allows me to say the following.
1) A cursory look at jobs that I know of or are listed puts the salary range between 70-85 thousand in the current state of affairs. There is a very fine job doing both NO and TLM very close to me offering 85,000. I myself am paid quite well for doing 3 masses a weekend with chant, Latin ordinary and in the near future, polyphony. I am putting in a new pipe organ at the end of this month. So, you can make a reasonable living.
2) As someone already noted, the Pastor is the key. In fact its more than half the battle. If you do not realize this, you will not go as far as you wish.
3) If you are not willing to build a program to your liking, I cannot help you. As one of my priest friends says, " you have to build your little corner of Christendom." I am doing it for the 3rd time and hopefully my last. But don't complain about doing the 4 hymn sandwich if you are not an agent of change. Find the priest and the parish and get started.
4) Sorry but multiple Masses are the nature of the beast in the Latin rite. I play 3 over the weekend and it is a pleasure from the days when I did 5 and 6. But we do what we do.
5) The Roman rite is changing....for the better. I get calls at least once a week from priests looking for musicians willing to reform parishes. There is a shortage of good musicians. It is hard work and I have the scars to prove it. But there is no place greater for me. When I come to the sequence for Easter every year I am thankful to do another year in this work.
6) Feel free to message me if I can be of support.
as to 4) I think that such is true, but I appreciate that in trad land, one Mass is the main Mass and everything else is subordinate to it, barring a few rare (but good) cases where you have a solemn Mass (or at least have a polyphonic choir to augment a schola) and then a second Missa Cantata due to lack of space. "Every Mass must have a lot of music," with only nominal differences is quite demanding and takes a toll on the musician. I know of one parish where they just switch the repertoire selections but where it's chant + high level early music at two different Masses, every week, which is great (it's not my cup of tea, but it's still valuable). That works best at a place like Cantius or even Saint Agnes where you can have a real division of labor between the priests/clergy/brothers or high-level professionals whom you trust. It's not like the chorale is parachuting in at Saint Agnes.
but even as a volunteer (who still does a lot, because it's necessary) I can say a lot of the same. I don't have two Masses, but I ordinarily have Mass and Vespers, if not a second Mass later in the week.
To participate in the discussions on Catholic church music, sign in or register as a forum member, The forum is a project of the Church Music Association of America.