A worthy and well conceived project. Some of your pointing is a bit dated, and some accents misplaced. Still, this is a laudable improvement over most any offerings of the psalm.
Musical fashions change; between 1900 and 2000 the church went from Pustet, to Vatican 1908, to Old Solesmes, to 1979 Triplex chironomy, to ... (I can't keep up).
Dated, maybe - but very easy to read. I have rarely seen easy to read pointing. Often it goes: Oh look! This is bold, that is in italics, oh look a bar line that does not fit with the text...now what?
Jonathan, this has indeed been one of my frustrations whenever I've attempted Anglican Chant. Each edition / editor seems to have their preferred method, some of which are not easily digestible. The worst is when there are multiple italic words in a row. IMHO it is much more easily parsable when each time you change note, it rotates between bold/italic/regular whatever. I also wish editors used some sort of slur or some other more clear method to indicate when a single syllable takes more than one note. Sometimes it's hard to tell if you're not reading ahead.
To be clear, I absolutely love the sound of Anglican Chant done well. It is stunningly beautiful when sung by some of the great cathedral choirs. I just cant sight read it worth a darn.
To participate in the discussions on Catholic church music, sign in or register as a forum member, The forum is a project of the Church Music Association of America.