I notice that the text for Palestrina's motet "Viri Galilei" is not the same as the introit for Ascension. Was the introit different in his day, or was the motet for another liturgical purpose? I've not found anything conclusive on this, would appreciate any help, thanks!
It's a setting of the First Antiphon at Second Vespers of Ascension, not the Introit at Mass. The Secunda pars is the Offertory of the Mass on Ascension Day.
Thank you, and I guess I did see the connection with those separate texts - so that made me wonder just what it would've been used for. In the sense that, if he was writing something to be used as an introit, why didn't he simply use the introit text? Maybe this is just one of history's mysteries...?
It might be possible for the secunda pars, Ascendit Deus, to be used (or even intended by Palestrina to be used) in place of the chanted Versicle and Response before the Magnificat at Second Vespers of Ascension (the text is the same).
One wonders if that is so. Nowadays, I think that one would chant that, even in an HIP, because we simply don’t know know enough to say that was the intention of Palestrina.
From our modern viewpoint, we're always surprised that so much of the "installed base" of polyphony is for the Office. It was a whole different cultural ecology then.
To participate in the discussions on Catholic church music, sign in or register as a forum member, The forum is a project of the Church Music Association of America.