These are lovely. I wish I currently had use for them! Perhaps think about some of the Tudor-/Stuart-era underlay conventions, eg. in "shew forth thy", moving "thy" a quaver earlier, to C. Giving occasional divisi to the lower parts can add interest and vitality to certain words, harmonic progressions, etc. This is good stuff: true contemporary sacred music!
Salieri, these are indeed nice! I do have several suggestions about syllabification which I shall go into detail about later. One, which I will mention now is for the response in the suffrages 'For there is none other...'. Here I would definitely underlay the treble at '...only thou, O God' thusly:
This 'throw of accent' would be a common Tudor-Jacobean treatment and would add period, rhythmic, and textual flavour. There are some other places where you might do this as well.
I like your P & Rs. They are beautiful, and I shall mention them to Edmund.
About that final 'amen': the treble line is nice if a little up and down the scale. More helpful though would be more counter-movement between beats in the lower voices
I think that the bottom one is the best. It has a good climax going up to the high G and coming down in a typical Tudor fashion to the lovely suspension and cadence. Also, get rid of the tenor's last c - the series c-b-a-c is dull and rhythmically clumsy.
About the first one. It, too, is nice but for two things: 1) the octaves between treble and bass going from bar 2 to 3, and 2) I would get rid of the repetitious c that occurs with the doubled treble part in the last two bars - omit the upper voice. The f-natural in the alto in inspired and very period English. Omit the tenor's last c - the c-b-a-c series is lackluster and weak.
To participate in the discussions on Catholic church music, sign in or register as a forum member, The forum is a project of the Church Music Association of America.