Introducing myself....
  • Hello all.

    I've lurked for a bit to get a feel for the dynamic of this place. So I realize some of you may roll your eyes when I mention "guitar". Bear with me for a minute.....

    As a fairly recent Catholic convert (5 years), I personally prefer my music in a mass setting to lean more to the traditional, but I try not to be a snob about it. Even though I am an avid guitarist, if I am at a mass where some dude dressed like he was on the set of "A Mighty Wind" is strumming cowboy chords to an Andre' Crouch tune, I might roll my eyes a bit.....especially if there's a competent organist just a few feet away.

    As a lifelong guitarist with substantial classical training and experience in a myriad of styles, I try to be sensitive to the Holy Spirit's calling that there may be a need for my talent.

    On a whim, I attended a small urban parish last Sunday, and they had no music director. The priest himself directed most of the singing, and it was all a capella. I asked him if this was by choice or out of necessity. He said it was necessity. I gave him a bit of my background and offered to help. Even though he conducted the mass in a very traditional manner, he seemed very open to the idea and we are going to meet and talk about it in the coming days. This parish is dynamic, but it is small and simply cannot afford a full time music director/professional organist. I don't even know if they have an organ or if it works. From what I could see of their choir loft, it was tiny. So I will be a volunteer. And judging by how I heard the songs sung in that 1st service I attended, I will use my classical experience and voice my guitar parts more akin to how an organist would voice them, freely using a capo to be able to play idiomatically in not so guitar friendly keys.

    So even though I am not an organist or a choir director, I am here to glean ideas. This is new territory for me and I am looking forward to it.

    I've already recorded an album of sacred music arranged for solo classical guitar. I did that more as a prayer than anything. Kind of a "first fruits" type of thing. I've had that idea brewing for years, ever since Rick Foster was putting out his albums and Christopher Parkening made his conversion splash. But everything that I tried to do on that end in the 80's just sounded like a parroting of what Chris and Rick had already done, so I shelved it. A few months after my confirmation, something clicked and the ideas started flowing. I wanted to record it with natural reverb and no plugins, so I asked the parish priest of an old stone church if I could use the room, and he replied by giving me a key and told me to return it when I was done. That album can be found by simple doing a search on my name.

  • MatthewRoth
    Posts: 2,315
    I mean, do what you have to do... I guess. I have learned compromise in most matters liturgical makes me upset. So I avoid it. You’ll find others who think like that.
  • Don9of11Don9of11
    Posts: 708
    I'm not a fan of guitar Masses mostly because all I hear is strumming or have a folk music atmosphere to them. I like folk music if im sitting around a campfire, but not in the Mass. However, I like classical guitar. There are many beautiful devotional hymns, Mass settings if played "classically" if that's a style that would be very appropriate. Just like playing Moonlight Sonata classically on the guitar. I'm not a music director, just an old choir member and my advice is to keep your music sacred and devotional and you'll do well.

    I'm forwarding your name and website to our music director who also oversees our P&W band. Who knows maybe a classically played Mother Dearest, Mother Fairest will be heard one day in church.
  • doneill
    Posts: 207
    What you seem to be saying is that there is a difference between sacred music for the liturgy and devotional music, which is a good distinction to make. My brother is a skilled classical guitarist. He agrees that the guitar is a poor instrument for congregational singing. However, we have experimented playing together (I am an organist), with the guitar playing in more of a continuo style. Played skillfully with psalm tones, it can be quite effective and beautiful. The two instruments work well together (you often hear a similar combination in period-instrument baroque recordings, particularly in Italian music), the organ sustaining the chords and the guitar/lute/theorbo doing arpeggiation.
    Thanked by 1Ken_Whisler
  • Matthew, there is no liturgical compromise in this particular instance. The priest takes what he has to work with and makes it work. I am looking to simply help him and the parish.
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,980
    I am no fan of guitar since as was mentioned, it is usually played in a "folksy" style. I have been involved with Spanish Baroque and Classical era Latin masses that had guitar parts, played in a "classical" style - no strumming. That worked out well. My only comment is that the guitar and the harpsichord don't have the volume necessary to accompany a larger congregation in a big space. I know, they can be amplified, but that kind of destroys the tonality of the instruments and they come off sounding harsh - and over-amplified, of course.

    However, one has to acknowledge the portability of the guitar, making it useful in places without adequate instruments. Even the purists here would admit moving a 10-ton organ isn't practical. Some smaller churches have such limited resources, they can't afford even smaller organs.

    It sounds to me like the original poster is helping and improving a less than desirable situation. Therefore, party on!
  • I think it wise to acknowledge this: people will judge the OP just because he plays the guitar. It has likely already happened (I mean, it happens to organists, and pianists, and etc.). Some people will absolutely love everything he does, and some people will absolutely despise it, all for the same reason: "Oh, I LOVE the guitar! That was SOOOOO beautiful!" (even though you know you played it terribly), and others will say, "We need to take all the guitars in the world and burn them," (even if you know you gave the best performance of your life).

    I second the idea of using the guitar in the continuo style, as opposed to the amateurish strumming you get nowadays. The problem going into Sacred Music as a guitarist is that you are fighting 50 years of amateur "folk musicians" who have strummed their way through some of the most trite and banal music accompanying some of the most silly and sometimes sacrilegious liturgies you've ever encountered. It doesn't mean that guitar can't be done well, it's just there's already a history here.

    I guess my larger point is this: don't let people's opinions (and there will be many) about what you do sway your notion of right and wrong. Do what you know is right, the best way you can, no matter what anyone says about it. Some places aren't ready for true Sacred Music yet.
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,980
    ...and others will say, "We need to take all the guitars in the world and burn them," (even if you know you gave the best performance of your life).


    I have concluded that burning many of the guitarists would be a better solution.

  • The priest himself directed most of the singing, and it was all a capella. I asked him if this was by choice or out of necessity. He said it was necessity.


    If they're already singing a cappella, build on that. It may be out of necessity now, but that is a great skill for a congregation to have: strong, confident and accurate unaccompanied signing.
  • Hi Ken - welcome to the forum, and congratulations on your courage which you demonstrate 1) by offering your services to the church in a difficult situation and 2) by posting your first post here and including the word 'guitar'. ;-)
    Seriously, you have undertaken to do a great service, because without worship the people of God can go nowhere, and helping to improve the quality of worship is a great service.
    Despite what you might think after some of the above comments (really guys! was that welcoming????) 'traditional' Mass leanings are not for the snobbish - on the contrary. The native music of the Roman rite, chant, is freely available to singers and musicians on the internet (no royalties to pay to big business and no expensive books to buy - check out the resources on CMAA website); it is also the simplest, and most accessible sort of music for a congregation to learn, if they have someone who will invest some time and effort into it.
    I would suggest that before you start, you consider the following: In your ideal picture ( which should be formed by the ideal picture of the church, tempered by the realities of your situation) what would the Mass you are serving at look like?
    You have the greatest asset to hand - a priest who sings.
    You don't say if you yourself sing at all, though clearly you are musical so I am going to assume you do.
    Check out the three levels of sung participation in the Mass which as specified in the document Musica Sacra. As you will see, it gives a lot more emphasis to the singing of the parts of the Mass by the priest and the congregation, than to the hymns we usually think of as the 'singing at Mass'. Based on this, what can you do to help this priest to sing his parts, and to teach and encourage the congregation to sing theirs?
    I would note two things - asking the congregation to respond in song to a spoken invitation by the priest is a lot less effective than having the priest sing his part, and for them to respond in song; secondly, accompaniment may actually inhibit congregational singing, if they are led to believe that this is something they should be listening too, rather than singing themselves. So brush off your vocal skills before you pick up an instrument.
    Finally when it comes to singing the Propers (first choice) or replacing them with other, appropriate sacred music, again, although musicians don't always want to acknowledge this, the music of the church gives priority to the text which is sung, not to elaborate musical arrangements to tickle the ears. While some occasional instrumental pieces on your classical guitar might be nice they should probably be used sparingly, and possible seen as an opportunity to introduce a melody to the congregation which they will then learn to sing.
    Finally finally, can you build a group around your generous offer of help? And learn with them, or train them, as best you can, to know and love the music of the church? Can you involve some young people in the project? When it comes to chant, children learn quicker, retain more, have less prejudices, and a much longer future for implementation that adult singers, so they are well worth investing in.
    It is hard to imagine what Mass should sound like, so going to the Colloquium, or seeking out a church with good practice might help, it is a different experience to sit immersed in the music while at prayer, than to listen to it on the internet.
    God bless you for your generosity, and may the Holy Spirit guide your endeavours.
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,980
    Despite what you might think after some of the above comments (really guys! was that welcoming????)


    What are you talking about? Not welcoming? He's not a folk guitarist, seems genuinely interested in providing good sacred music, probably is not being paid for this, and he's not Irish. What's not to like? LOL
    Thanked by 1bonniebede
  • matthewjmatthewj
    Posts: 2,700
    Most people don't know what purple text means... that's a very "inside culture" thing around here.
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,980
    FWIW, it means something that was not intended to be taken seriously. That's why it is in purple.
    Thanked by 1Casavant Organist
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,980
    Then there is that yellow square...
  • francis
    Posts: 10,825
    which was originally a single period "."
  • SalieriSalieri
    Posts: 3,177
    I second all of Bonnie's wisdom.

    Was the priest directing a choir (of whatever fashion) that was leading the singing, or was he simply leading the congregation? Also, what style of music was it and what hymnal do they have?

    Some Observations & Ideas:

    1) Echoing Bonnie: chant is the natural musical voice of the Roman Rite. What Mass setting are they currently using; does it work unaccompanied? Try teaching them the ICEL Mass (in English) and gradually add some parts (in Latin) from Gregorian Settings from the Kyriale Simplex and the Kyriale Romanum. The Sanctus more Ambrosiano from the K.S. is very, very effective; and the Kyrie from K.R. Mass XI (orbis factor) is too, also Kyrie & Gloria from Mass VIII (de Angelis) is well known; and Agnus Dei ad libitum II from the K.R. is beautiful and simple.

    2) With more traditional hymnody, unison, unaccompanied congregational singing can be very effective: as a matter of fact, looking at the Protestant English tradition---which is where most of our current 'traditional' hymns in English come from---that was the norm in the early days. Those arrangements of tunes like OLD HUNDREDTH by Dowland & Co. were meant as private devotional music for home use, in church they were sung unison. So don't be afraid of that!

    3) Begin asking around the congregation (after Mass--Do they have any kind of coffee hour?) if there are any people who really enjoy singing. Form a schola cantorum to help lead the congregation and sing the propers. Begin with the Communion Chant. Good collections for this are Paul F. Ford's By Flowing Waters, which is an English-ized Graduale Simplex: It contains seasonal chants, in modern notation: very good for people just starting out; Fr. Samuel Webers Propers fo the Mass for Sundays and Solemnities: propers, in English, in Chant notation, from the Roman Gradual & Roman Missal, each text has four different settings, ranging from easy to difficult; Adam Bartlett's Lumen Christi Simple Gradual: Simple settings of the Propers from the Gradual and Missal in English; and Bartlett's Simple English Propers, simple settings in English from the Roman Gradual.

    4) Become a member of CMAA: you get the quarterly journal, and member discounts on the Sacred Music Colloquium, Chant intensives, and Winter Sacred Music conferences--which you should think about attending.

    5) Don't be afraid to ask questions here, you will learn A TON. But do have a thick skin: the sarcasm flows as readily around here as does the fine wine. Bon Appetit.
  • SalieriSalieri
    Posts: 3,177
    Oh,

    6) If you want the schola to sing any "Anthems" don't be afraid of anthem-izing some hymns: Sing them in unison, to start, and base your guitar-part on those old Dowland faburdens. They work really, really well like that!
    Thanked by 1Casavant Organist
  • The key is to do it from the loft or other place where you are out of site. Seriously. People will be much more receptive. The music will sell itself.

    You will find yourself hired to play for weddings without question.

    Your playing of your arrangement of O Sons and Daughters is stunningly beautiful and ADORATION as well.

    I'd suggest when playing solo during Mass to avoid all well-known hymns and delve into the older hymns as you have done with these two. What you have done with these two surpasses what we hear played on the organ in many, if not most, parishes.

    Since they are not among the top 40 of hymns, it takes away any sense of commercialism.

    Stunningly beautiful and in the tradition of the great guitar masters.
  • BruceL
    Posts: 1,072
    Hey Ken, welcome. Do you know Stephen Bright? He lives in West Texas now, but played classical guitar (harp-guitar, to be precise) for about 15 years at St. Mary Cathedral in Austin. I had the privilege of working with him for about a year and a half while I was in grad school there (I played organ). He did a nice job with it. I had to keep the organ pretty subdued, but we had fun...lots of "improvisation competitions"! If you have a solid cantor, it will be great. Please message me on here if you have questions or if you want Stephen's contact info. I'm sure he'd be happy to help, and is a luthier, too.
    Thanked by 1Ken_Whisler

  • ...and others will say, "We need to take all the guitars in the world and burn them," (even if you know you gave the best performance of your life).


    I have concluded that burning many of the guitarists would be a better solution.


    That's OK. I don't mind one bit. You see, I never went through RCIA. For a few years before I became Catholic, I attended a few Orthodox parishes and even went through 8 months of one on one catechism with an Antiochian Orthodox priest. When my Orthodox days came to a close after a rather vocal differing of opinions with that priest, the Catholic priest at my boundary parish saw fit to accept my Orthodox catechism and let me forego RCIA. All to say that I know full well that 90% of the Orthodox faithful feel that all organs need to be burned, and a serious chunk of that 90% would look the other way if organists got caught in the flames.

    (Since you guys don't know me that well, yet, tongue planted firmly in cheek.....;-))
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,980
    You are taking us much too seriously. I am a Byzantine Catholic who works in a Latin Rite parish. Yes, I play organ and have had a fondness for the instrument since my long-ago youth. There are no instruments in my Byzantine parish and they never caught on in the east. It's a cultural difference.

    What has happened in the west, however, is something far more than the cultural and language difference between Greek and Latin cultures. There was an abrogation of the established rite in the west and the introduction of a revised liturgy that was supposedly a reform. Some westerners would not agree on that and consider it more of a revolution destroying the established order. Had this happened in the east, the congregations would have walked out the door, after perhaps burning not guitars, but the clergy responsible.

    You will notice that I did post something along the lines that if guitars are all you have, use them well and wisely. Unfortunately, the U.S. Latin church has had 50 years of semi-talented people doing, as you said, "folk" music, and doing it badly. The purpose of CMAA is to reestablish music that is sacred and beautiful. The liturgy deserves no less.
    Thanked by 1Ken_Whisler
  • ...would have walked out the doors...after... burning the clergy responsible.

    And therein lies the difference between Eastern and Western folk. The horrors of post-VII liturgy would never have happened in the East. Westerners, on the contrary, will just sit still, swallow, blink, and take whatever they're dished out. And after a mere two or three decades they even think of it as 'traditional'.
  • SalieriSalieri
    Posts: 3,177
    (Since you guys don't know me that well, yet, tongue planted firmly in cheek.....;-))

    Methinks he'll fit in quite nicely...
  • With all due respect, I -got- the joke and was simply responding with a similar timbre. If the humor was not obvious or overtly dark, my apologies. Besides....masses that I have attended in the last 5 years that involved guitarists, -I'm- the one that fights back the overwhelming desire to burn the guitar.

    It brings to mind an interview of Chet Atkins, where he was asked what he thought of Hendrix, to which he responded, "I saw him on TV once. He burned a guitar." The interviewer asked Chet if that bothered him, Chet replied, "No, not at all! Many of them NEED to be burned."

    My conversion was not one of intellectual assent, it was born out of faith and obedience. In the early days of my re-acclimating from the Orthodox to the Catholic environment, when I first heard that...that....that awwwfffuuul and blatant rip off of the Desmond classic "Take Five" applied to "Sing To the Lord a New Song", I raised my eyes to the sky and asked God, "You are kidding, right?" (Tongue in cheek, guys!)

    I love it here.

  • Methinks he'll fit in quite nicely...


    I just voluntarily left CARM. This place is Sesame Street compared to that awful place.
    Thanked by 1Salieri
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,980
    I don't get out much. What is CARM?
  • francis
    Posts: 10,825
    Unfortunately, the U.S. Latin church has had 50 years of semi-talented people doing, as you said, "folk" music
    semi? how about UNtalented?
    Thanked by 1CharlesW
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,980
    Francis, I was trying to be charitable.
  • I don't get out much. What is CARM?


    You may want to keep it that way.
    Thanked by 1CHGiffen
  • irishtenoririshtenor
    Posts: 1,325
    Charismatic and Renewal Music? I literally have no idea
  • Jani
    Posts: 441
    You're a luthier!! (Oh, I bet you already knew that). I listened to the samples of your music on Amazon- it's beautiful and reverent, and that is what counts as far as I'm concerned, with the whole instrument debate.

    Nice to have you here.
  • canadashcanadash
    Posts: 1,501
    I second going to the Colloquium or another conference of a similar calibre and aesthetic. There is nothing like learning from such knowledgeable people and singing with those who are like-minded. Best wishes for a long and fruitful service to the Church!
    Thanked by 1CHGiffen
  • AOZ
    Posts: 369
    Hi, Ken. I'm probably perceived as a bit of a lurker here these days...only because I haven't been around much in the past couple of years. So I'm going to tread lightly in making a comment or two. :)

    First, welcome.

    Secondly, about the guitar: I think it has been given a bad rap in these environs. A few of the comments above spelled out why...poorly strummed accompaniments (or vigorously strummed) to banal tunes, etc. Just bad music, not a good match for liturgy at all. So I get that.

    But I also think that if we step back and look at all of sacred music and liturgical music as a whole, we need to be more reasonable about it, and consider where it might become a valuable part of the liturgy continuum. I have come to believe, and firmly, that if people are willing to abide or argue for an orchestral Mass, then they should also be willing to abide and argue for a Mass which makes us of a guitar in some way.

    Both need to nod to tradition. Neither is native to the Mass; neither is essential, like the chant. The problem with the guitar is not the instrument itself - it is the associations people have developed in the last fifty years, which is unfortunate. And unfortunately, associations are real.

    But in the big scheme of things, maybe fifty years isn't that long. I don't think you should put your guitar away...not that anyone here was suggesting that, entirely. I don't really know how you'd proceed...and I don't have any real suggestions at the moment. But I do applaud you for stepping up, and being honest and open, and forward looking. It is a hopeful thing.
  • A skilled guitarist is worth a thousand bad organists. Pay no heed to the uncharitable.

    The first thing you need to do is pray:
    Is this where God wants you right now? And are you and your family willing to make the personal sacrifices that involvement in church music requires? (You know where church musicians spend a LOT of time at Christmas and Easter, when everyone else is partying or holdaying, right? Do you have a loving heart and a desire to serve God's people with your musical gifts? Can you show Christ's love to people even if they don't like your music?

    If you think that this is what God is asking of you right now, and that you are up to it - then as well as some of the advice above, you need to make friends in the parish. You cannot do this alone, and even a little talent can go a long way if it is accompanied by a heart that is willing to serve and a mind that is teachable.
  • a_f_hawkins
    Posts: 3,471


    Description

    387393 Detail of angel musician from a painting of the Virgin and Child surrounded by six angels, 1437-44 (oil & gold on wood), Sassetta (Stefano di Giovanni di Consolo) (c.1392-1450)

    image
    angel-musician-sassetta.jpg
    879 x 900 - 354K
  • melofluentmelofluent
    Posts: 4,160
    Ken,
    Please check your message inbox, two clicks to the right of the discussion button above the comments thread window.
  • SalieriSalieri
    Posts: 3,177
    I'm no expert in strings, whether bowed, fretted, or whatever, but there must be some lute fantasias, etc., that would work excellently on guitar that could be useful as preludes, meditations, etc. But, of course, you probably know all of that already. I just listened to some samples of your playing: absolutely fantastic; I can't see why this style of playing would be any more obtrusive than organs or orchestras---except, perhaps, in 19th century Russia.

    My objections to the "guitar Mass" phenomenon are almost solely based on the quality and style of the literature, although bad playing is also a component. (It's also my objection to the pre-conciliar "Rossini Propers" and Hymn-Tune Mass Ordinaries.) And my only objection to guitar as an accompaniment to congregational singing is simply based on acoustics: the guitar, unless amplified, which causes it to loose, in my opinion, much of its charm, is unsuitable for accompanying large congregations in large spaces - just as you can't accompany a large congregation in a large space solely on an 8' flute - but in smaller, more intimate spaces, with smaller congregations, I think it would work quite well; and it can easily be used to accompany a small parish choir or vocal consort. By all means, play!
    Thanked by 1AOZ
  • CharlesW
    Posts: 11,980
    I can't see why this style of playing would be any more obtrusive than organs or orchestras---except, perhaps, in 19th century Russia.


    Everything western is obtrusive in 19th-century Russia. Is outrage!
    Thanked by 1Salieri
  • Welcome, Ken!
    I don't do much commenting here after I realized I commented too much. :)

    However, I did want to weigh in on guitar. I serve as music director of a parish program where 90% of the repertoire is chant and polyphony. And I love it.

    My husband, William Wilson, is a classical guitarist who shares your views on how to use the guitar well to accompany chant. It can be done prayerfully.
    I echo Bonnie's thoughts and also encourage you to strengthen singing skills as well if you are leading any singing. If people are comfortable chanting in reasonably good tune (they will not be perfect with instrumental accompaniment either) then work from that foundation and add guitar judiciously. Depending on the acoustics of the church, it might be really tough to support the singing with guitar. YMMV. Sounds like you'll get a lot of guidance from the priest as well. I wish you the best, and I bet you'll be able to give some good accounts of how things are working soon enough.

    Volunteering to help a struggling parish at the beginning of Lent shows you are brave and generous. May God reward you.
    Thanked by 2CHGiffen Ken_Whisler
  • In my humble opinion, the problem with guitar usage in liturgy is the same of the piano. Not only they don't have the same acknowledged features of a pipe organ -- like the sustained emission and huge dynamic range, among many others, which are very useful for the liturgy -- but also they are too much used for secular/folk or even anti-catholic music, specially since a few decades ago (but also before). Of course, there're many different ways to perform the piano or the guitar. But, unlike the voice, which is also used for the same bad (would say, rock'n'roll music) or profane (opera or folk) music, guitar/piano and other (semi-)prepared instruments always have so much in common in their sound production, despite of what or how well they are being played. If people want a liturgy is a mood and atmosphere mystically distant to the world, they should consider choosing repertoire and instrumentation that lesses the chance of being interpreted by the Mass assistance as an unwanted continuation of worldly production inside the church, for the sake of (facilitating) rising minds to God. By the way, this similarly one of many useful things of latin usage in liturgy. Beyond an organ education and performance in liturgy that begun 2 years and a half ago with the installation of a traditional apostolate in my local area, I'm also a professional symphony orchestra violinist. Even so, I rarely perform the violin in liturgy, and only do when there's an special and very convenient consonance between a great feast, repertoire, and play in a manner somewhat different to what I do every day. For example, the last two times we used the violin in liturgy was in the Communio program for the Easter Vigil Mass, when we performed the Biber Resurrection Sonata (from the Rosary Sonatas), with all the scordatura which turns the violin a lot different animal from its daily and common usage, and with some tempi, emission and articulation adjustments that might make the whole thing somewhat similar to the organ and its predicates. The other time was about a Bach violin concerto movement, played right after exit procession, as an extension to the recessional program (begun with the organ) and to help giving a distinctive mood for an special celebration.

    The guitar playing and repertoire could be also treated with the utmost care, but I'm afraid there would always be considerable vestige that would make this instrument unappropriate for the liturgy. For people, like me, who dedicated decades of their lives to such instruments, there are many ways to help better and safely the liturgy. How about taking advantage of music education and experience to learn deeply gregorian chant and educate/rehearse an schola cantorum and/or a polyphonic choir? Or even learn to play the organ? This is also a two-way road. I became a better violinist after begun those chant and organ immersions.
  • 'm no expert in strings, whether bowed, fretted, or whatever, but there must be some lute fantasias, etc., that would work excellently on guitar that could be useful as preludes, meditations, etc. But, of course, you probably know all of that already.


    I know my way around the lute/vihuela/baroque guitar repertoire; Dowland, Milan, Sanz, Weiss, much of the Bach "Lute" suites. My teacher in college, to break the syndrome most guitarists have of veiwing the score vertically, encouraged us to use colored pencils to horizontally trace voices whenever we took on a fugue or canon. Matter of fact, he was very effective at teaching us to find the horizontal thread or threads in -anything- that we played. I once took his advice a step further by taking the original tablature along with Poulton's piano transcription of one of Dowland's more famous fantasies and did my own transcription with colored pencils.

    dowland_fantasie0001.pdf
    4M
  • Antonio, quite frankly......no.

    As educated and pious and correct as your post is, it 100% -ignores- the whole premises of the OP:

    -This is a small and relatively poor (yet strikingly beautiful, dynamic, and very reverent) parish in a blighted part of the city.

    -I would be using -my- talents to fill a need. Just as I said earlier in this thread that my conversion had little to do with intellectual assent and everything to do with faith and obedience, myself taking this task is also out of faith and obedience and not intellectual assent.

    I am confident that if any of you thought it absolutely necessary that this parish has a proper pipe organ, the priest would be more than happy to let any one of you either restore or replace the existing one and man it.
  • As to mentions of the acoustics, I have a really good feel of how my guitar responds to different rooms, and I am very confident I could play in this particular parish with no electronics. In this instance, if the voices were noticeably stronger than the guitar, that would not be a bad thing at all.

    As a luthier, I like to plane my tops down to the point where they just barely hold string tension, so they are quite boomy. Boomy to the point that when I record, I have to move the mics back at least 3 feet and hang blankets up around the room. Or record in a room big enough for the sound to dissipate a bit....like a century old stone parish....like I did ;-)
  • Charismatic and Renewal Music? I literally have no idea


    The Catholic discussion forums at Christian Research & Apologetics Ministry. Also known as the platform of the purest online hatred any Catholic will ever face.
  • chonakchonak
    Posts: 9,216
    Years ago when I visited the Trappist abbey in Piffard, NY, a classical guitarist played before the morning Mass. It was certainly pleasant, but it might not work out the same in an average parish church where one wouldn't be playing into a pristine silence.
    Thanked by 1Casavant Organist
  • MatthewRoth
    Posts: 2,315
    Ken, most of the chorale music gems in this country were at one point struggling urban parishes. So, what Antonio says ought to be someone’s goal, even if not your own.
  • My only goal here is obedience and servitude....whether for one week or twenty years.
  • MatthewRoth
    Posts: 2,315
    ...what about trying to faithfully implement the teachings of the church on sacred music? I have no problem, outside of Lent of course, with your instrument being used in some way liturgically. But, I think with instruction from someone of your caliber would do wonders for a parish. I suspect you would enjoy the Colloquium run by the host organization, the CMAA.
    Thanked by 1Casavant Organist
  • The teachings of the church on sacred music, while stating a preference for the organ, plainly allows use of other instruments.
    Thanked by 1Casavant Organist
  • Ken,
    I've been observing my Lenten fast from all things internet (except e-mail, because it's my Lenten penance, not everyone else's), but since today is Sunday, and Sunday's not part of Lent, I'll respond.

    1) Welcome aboard.
    2) I've arranged organ music for classically played guitar (as part of an ensemble which included a flute and a trumpet), so I don't think the guitar should be consigned to the dustbin.
    3) Other instruments are, indeed, permitted at Mass -- but context is everything in this case. The criterion isn't primarily a musical one, but that the instrument be fitting (or be able to be made fitting) for the august ceremonies of the Church's public worship of God, sometimes called the Liturgy. So, it is quite possible for orchestral instruments to be fitting instruments when they contribute to the solemnity of the liturgical ceremonies. It is possible for beautiful music to be written for guitar. It is possible for a guitar to accompany a solo voice or even a small ensemble, and still be played in a manner fitting for the august ceremonies of the Church's public worship of God -- for it is possible for a harp and a harpsichord to be, also. The question to answer is this: is a guitar, played as it is designed to be played, and unamplified by microphones, capable of more than this? A single violin would encounter the same question.
    4) Strumming i.e., playing a guitar in a manner most consistent with the common (vulgar in the sense of "by the common people", not in the sense of "rude") conception of how the guitar should be played is inconsistent with what the Church tells us about music and instruments suitable for the public worship of the Church, for the same reason that Verdi's music is, mostly: it was written with the opera stage in mind, and continues to hold that association in the public mind.
    5) If you have a pastor who has unaccompanied singing as the default position, since you've been given this gift, why not use it? Encourage the congregation to sing, to hear itself honoring God.
    Thanked by 1Ken_Whisler
  • irishtenoririshtenor
    Posts: 1,325
    I'm not trying to argue with you, Ken, because I think you will be a real upgrade for this parish and that your heart seems to be in the right place. I am also thoroughly impressed by your facility on the guitar, AND I even think that there is a place for someone like you to use the guitar liturgically.

    That said, if it's all about obedience and servitude, why not spend some energy trying to learn how to (someday, when you're ready) lead music in the manner the Church prefers: chant, polyphony, and organ?

    I know Rome wasn't built in a day, and you may not do any chant, polyphony, or organ music in your first year (or even 2!). That said, I think it would be good for you to start to obediently try to do what he Church prefers, rather than what She allows. Aim for the ideal and try to bring the parish and people along with you.